Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if an I-gel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure compared to an Ambu Auragain in adult patients in an ambulatory surgery center.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Patients who are scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia will be randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 will receive an I-gel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and group 2 will receive an Ambu Auragain LMA.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Igel Larnygeal Mask Airway Group 1 will receive the I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway for airway maintenance during general anesthesia |
Device: I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway
The I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway is a medical device that keeps a patient's airway open during anaesthesia or unconsciousness.
|
Active Comparator: Ambu Auragain Laryngeal mask airway Group 2 will receive the Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway for airway maintenance during general anesthesia |
Device: Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway
The Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway is a medical device that keeps a patient's airway open during anaesthesia or unconsciousness.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) [4 hours]
OLP will be measured immediately after insertion. This will be accomplished by closing the expiratory valve while keeping fresh gas flow at 3 liters/minute until equilibrium is reached. Pressure will be reported in cmH2O.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to Placement [4 hours]
Time required to place laryngeal mask airway will be measured and reported in seconds.
- Insertion Attempts [4 hours]
Number of attempts required for successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway.
- First Attempt Success Rate [4 hours]
Percent of laryngeal mask airway placements that are successful upon first attempt.
- Ease of Insertion [4 hours]
The clinician who places the laryngeal mask airway will be asked to rate ease of insertion on a four point rating scale: 1, no resistance; 2, mild resistance; 3, moderate resistance; and 4, inability to place device. Outcome will be reported as the mean score per group.
- Number of Mid-Case Adjustments [4 hours]
Number of adjustments made to laryngeal mask airway following insertion.
- Sore Throat [8 hours, 24 hours]
Participants will be asked upon discharge from recovery room (approximately 8 hours post surgery) to rate the soreness of their throat on a numerical rating scale of 0-10 (0 being no soreness and 10 being maximum imaginable soreness). Participants will be asked to rate throat soreness again via phone call approximately 24 hours after surgery.
- Blood staining of Laryngeal Mask Airway [4 hours]
Upon removal, staff will observe the laryngeal mask airway for the presence of blood and report a yes or no value. Number of devices with blood staining will be reported per group.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- undergoing outpatient ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia that is amenable to using a laryngeal mask airway
Exclusion Criteria:
-
non-English speaking patients
-
patients with abnormal airway anatomy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55455 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Minnesota
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jacob Hutchins, MD, University of Minnesota
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ANES-2020-28604