Echogenic Versus Non-echogenic Needles for Venous Access

Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05045352
Collaborator
(none)
100
2
29.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Randomized controlled intervention study comparing echogenic needles with non echogenic needles for ultrasound guided venous access in the subclavian vein.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: echogenic needles for intravenous access
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing certain surgical procedures and patients in intensive care unit require a central venous catheter (CVC) for infusion of medicaments and for monitoring. Central venous access (CVA) can be performed both with a blind technique or an ultrasound guided technique. A common place for CVA is the subclavian vein.

While many guidelines recommend the use of ultrasound for jugular access, there are no explicit recommendations for subclavian CVA For ultrasound guided CVA procedures good needle visualization is important to successfully place the needle and catheter in the correct position.

Echogenic needles can give better needle visualization when performing ultrasound guided CVA procedures. Theoretically, the use of echogenic needles should improve performance time and success rates, and reduce complication rates due to a better needling control.

The investigators will investigate the use of echogenic needles for vascular access.

A prospective randomized controlled trial design will be used. Echogenic needles will be compared with non-echogenic (standard) needles. The main null hypothesis states that there is no difference in access time between the needles.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Two arms Venous access either with echogenic needles or with non-echogenic needlesTwo arms Venous access either with echogenic needles or with non-echogenic needles
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participant will be anesthetized and asleep Outcome assessor will not be in the operating theater during the procedure
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Ultrasound Guided Subclavian Vein Cannulation. Echogenic Needles Versus Non-echogenic Needles
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 10, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Echogenic needle

venous access performed under ultrasound guidance with echogenic needles

Device: echogenic needles for intravenous access
echogenic needles for intravenous access (subclavian vein) ultrasound guided procedure

No Intervention: Non-Echogenic needles

venous access performed under ultrasound guidance with non-echogenic needles

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time from skin puncture of the needle until aspiration of venous blood. [10 sec - 240 sec]

    Time from skin puncture of the needle until aspiration of venous blood in the syringe. Time till venous access

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Time from skin puncture until catheter in place [60 sec - 600 sec]

    Time from skin puncture until the catheter in place in the subclavian vein.

  2. Success with venous access in first needling attempt [60 sec - 600 sec]

    Success in first attempt is defined as one skin puncture and directly into the subclavian vein

  3. Number of needling attempts before venous access [60 sec - 600 sec]

    Number of attempts is defined as the counted number of needle attempts intermitted by a needle withdrawal of at least 0.5 cm until aspiration of venous blood.

  4. Number of skin punctures [60 sec - 600 sec]

    Number of skin punctures is defined as the counted number of skin punctures until aspiration of venous blood.

  5. The procedure was aborted [2 minutes - 20 minutes]

    Discontinuation of the procedure or change of site for vascular access

  6. Localization of catheter tip in x-ray [1 day- 7 days]

    Catheter misplacement judged by x-ray. X-ray will be performed after the surgery and a blinded observer will describe the localization of the catheter.

  7. The anaesthetists subjective experience with needle visualization [3 min- 20 min]

    After performing the vascular access the anaesthetists are asked about how they found the visualization of the needle using a Numeric Rating Scale

  8. The anaesthetists subjective experience with the needle placement [3 minutes - 20 minutes]

    After performing the vascular access the anaesthetist is asked how the needle placement was using a Numeric Rating Scale

  9. Adverse events during the procedure [1 minutes- 1 day]

    Adverse events, including information of the seriousness, treatment needed, resolution and relevant judgment concerning the causal relationship with the investigational devices or procedure will be summarized for safety information

  10. Adverse effects after the procedure [5 minutes - 1 week]

    Adverse device effects, including information of the seriousness, treatment needed, resolution and relevant judgment concerning the causal relationship with the investigational devices or procedure will be summarized

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:

undergoing a surgical procedure requiring a CVC Patients must be at least 18 years of age. Patients that have given informed written consent.

-

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients that do not speak or understand Norwegian language.

  • Skin disease or infection affecting the whole-body surface or within the area of examination.

  • Patients with untreated coagulopathy

  • Known vascular abnormality

  • Any reason why, in the opinion of the investigators, the patient should not participate.

  • Subject participates in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Oslo University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Trine Kåsine, MD, Department of Anaesthesiology Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Trine Kåsine, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05045352
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • REK 85090
First Posted:
Sep 16, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Sep 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Trine Kåsine, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 16, 2021