Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between bare platinum coil group and second-generation hydrogel coils for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The investigators aimed to analyze whether the use of second-generation hydrogel coils for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms improves clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with the use of bare platinum coils.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Second-generation hydrogel coil group Treatment using second-generation hydrogel coils (had to constitute > 50% of the total coil length) for ruptured cerebral aneurysms |
Device: Coil embolization
coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysm with bare platinum coils or second-generation hydrogel coils
|
Active Comparator: Bare platinum coil group Treatment using bare metal coil only for ruptured cerebral aneurysms |
Device: Coil embolization
coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysm with bare platinum coils or second-generation hydrogel coils
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- recurrence rate after treatment [during 12 months after coil embolization]
recurrence rate at 12 months after coil embolization
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications [during 12 months after coil embolization]
Rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications
- Rate of periprocedural complications [within 30 days after coil embolization]
Rate of periprocedural complications
- Assessment of clinical outcomes using modified Rankin Scale scores [during 12 months after coil embolization]
Modified Rankin Scale scores (0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
19 year old or older
-
untreated ruptured intracranial aneurysms with an anatomy such that endovascular treatment with either bare platinum or second-generation hydrogel coils was considered feasible.
-
person who agreed to study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
contrast allgery (+)
-
combined other intracranial lesions (tumor, moyamoya disease, cerebral vascular diseases)
-
ineligible for coil embolization
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital | Sejong | Chungnam | Korea, Republic of | 30099 |
2 | Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital | Yangsan | Gyeongsangnam-do | Korea, Republic of | 50612 |
3 | Seoul National University Bundang Hospital | Seongnam-si | Korea, Republic of | 13620 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: O-Ki Kwon, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- B-2012/652-002