Early Weightbearing Versus Non-weightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture

Sponsor
Hallym University Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02029170
Collaborator
(none)
192
4
2
36
48
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Unstable ankle fractures are commonly treated operatively. After operative reduction and fixation of the fractures, there are varying rehabilitation regimes that include non-weightbearing for 6 weeks with active range of motion exercise in a removal cast or brace, or early protected weightbearing in a rigid cast. Several papers reported that early weightbearing may decrease ankle stiffness, muscle and bone atrophy, and aids in early return to activities. However, early weightbearing may have the risk of displacement of the fixed fractures. Rehabilitation after operative treatment of an ankle fracture is still not clear. We hypothesized that the ankle function assessed on 12 months after operation of an ankle fracture with early weightbearing is not inferior to non-weightbearing but is superior to non-weightbearing with respect to time to return to normal daily life and time to full weightbearing.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Early weightbearing
  • Procedure: Non-weightbearing
N/A

Detailed Description

This study is a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial of patients presenting to multiple centers.

The primary outcome measure is the Olerud-Molander scores assess on 12 months after operation of an unstable ankle fracture. The Olerud-Molander scores were compared between the experimental group (early weightbearing) and the control group (non-weightbearing) on 12 month follow-up examination.

The Olerud-Molander score is a most widely used validated scale to assess ankle function after an ankle fracture. It is a self-administered patient questionnaire with a score of zero (totally impaired) to 100 (completely unimpaired) and is based on nine different items: pain, stiffness, swelling, stair climbing, running, jumping, squatting, supports and work/activities of daily living.

The secondary objectives are to determine whether early weightbearing is superior to non-weightbearing with respect to time until return to normal daily life and time to full weightbearing.

Other objectives are to determine safety by assessing number of participants with adverse effect such as hardware failure, reduction loss, non-union, or delayed union in each group.

The sample size was determined using methods appropriate for noninferiority trials, assuming 90% power and a significance level of 0.05. To find out whether the early weightbearing is not inferior to nonweightbearing after operation of an ankle fracture, 192 patients were required to have 90% power that the lower limit of an one-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between two treatments will be above the noninferiority margin of -8, adding 20% of assumed drop-out.

Determination of the noninferiority margin was based on clinical significance. In a previous study between early weightbearing versus nonweightbearing after an ankle fracture surgery, Simanski et al. reported that both groups showed good results in the Olerud-Molander score (87 vs. 79 points; p=0.25). In both groups, the majority of patients reached their preinjury level of activity. The difference in the Olerud-Molander score between the two groups was 8 points in favor of early weightbearing. Their study came from populations similar to our trial population and from interventions similar to those being studied in the current trial. We decided that the noninferiority margin at 8 points difference will be adequate to prove noninferiority of the experiment group (early weightbearing) over the control group (nonweightbearing).

If a subject had discontinued prior to completion of 12 months, the last observation is carried forward for the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects who crossed over to the other treatment arm, for an example, patients in non-weightbearing group who weightbear early, are analyzed according to their initial group allocation for the intent-to-treat analysis. Additionally, an as-treated (per-protocal) analysis was also conducted on patients who completed the 12 months follow-up with the protocol assigned.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
192 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Early Weightbearing Versus Non-weightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture: A Randomized Multicenter Non-inferiority Trial
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Early weightbearing

After operative reduction and fixation of the fractures, patients allocated to the early weightbearing group start weightbearing after stitch out at 2 weeks and the application of a walking cast.

Procedure: Early weightbearing
Patients allocated to early weightbearing group are allowed to weightbear after stitch out and application of a walking cast

Active Comparator: Non-weightbearing

Patients allocated to non-weightbearing group are kept non-weightbearing till 6 weeks post-operative

Procedure: Non-weightbearing
Patients allocated to non-weightbearing group are kept non-weightbearing till 6 weeks post-operative

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The Olerud-Molander ankle function score [12 months post-operative]

    The Olerud-Molander score is a most widely used validated scale to assess ankle function after an ankle fracture. It is a self-administered patient questionnaire with a score of zero (totally impaired) to 100 (completely unimpaired) and is based on nine different items: pain, stiffness, swelling, stair climbing, running, jumping, squatting, supports and work/activities of daily living.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Time to return to preinjury activity, time to full weightbearing, patients' subjective satisfactions, Visual analogue Scale (VAS) [upto 12 months]

    Time to return to preinjury activity and time to full weightbearing is going to be assessed. Patient's subjective satisfaction and VAS are going to be assessed on 12 months post-operative visit

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants with hardware failure, reduction loss, delayed union or non-union are assessed [Up to 12 month]

    A reduction loss or hardware failure was defined as one that occurred without patient instigation of inappropriate activity. The reduction loss or metal failure rate was to be monitored by study personnel not involved in the outcome assessment. >2 mm displacement. Delayed union was defined as a lack of bridging callus on 3 of 5 cortices at 12 weeks. Nonunion was defined as lack of cortical bridging or a clearly visible fracture line, at 14 weeks post injury.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • unstable ankle fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation

  • age between 18 and 65 years

  • satisfactory reduction and stable fixation after operation.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • open fractures

  • comminuted fractures

  • pathologic fractures

  • Pilon fractures

  • Trimalleolar fractures

  • fracture dislocations

  • Fractures requiring syndesmotic screw fixation

  • Fractures with cartilage injuries or unstable fixation or any other conditions preventing from early weightbearing.

  • Patients with diabetes or neuroarthropathy

  • Patients with obesity (BMI >30, weight >100 kg)

  • Any other conditions that are expected to prevent the patients from following the study protocol

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Anyang-si Gyeonggi-do Korea, Republic of 431-070
2 Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine Gunpo Gyeongi Korea, Republic of 435-040
3 CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University Seongnam Gyeongi Korea, Republic of 463-712
4 Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of 150-950

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hallym University Medical Center

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
  • Study Director: Hyong Nyun Kim, MD, PhD, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Hyong Nyun Kim, professor, MD, PhD, Hallym University Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02029170
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HUKSHHOS
First Posted:
Jan 7, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Oct 9, 2015
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Hyong Nyun Kim, professor, MD, PhD, Hallym University Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 9, 2015