New Treatment Perspectives in Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa: the Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain-directed Treatment

Sponsor
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05674266
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
55
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The present randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial aims at evaluating the efficacy of a tDCS treatment in improving the clinical outcome of adolescents with AN and investigate brain mechanisms acting in AN.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: AN Active tDCS
  • Device: AN Sham tDCS
N/A

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesized that excitatory tDCS over the left PFC and inhibitory tDCS over the right PFC (anode left/cathode right) may aid in altering/resetting inter-hemispheric balance in children and adolescents with AN, reducing their control over eating behaviors and improving the AN psychopathology. Furthermore, the investigators will employ TMS-EEG to directly explore the DLPFC activity of children and adolescent with AN, with specific attention to the differences between hemispheres. Moreover, paired pulse TMS and repetitive TMS protocols will be used to investigate the functional mechanisms within the prefrontal cortex of youth patients with AN. Then, the investigators will assess if potential changes of specific biomarkers, such as those related to the endogenous stress response system functioning, will occur after tDCS treatment and will correlate with clinical improvement.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
New Treatment Perspectives in Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa: the Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain-directed Treatment
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 30, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: AN Active tDCS

Treatment "as usual" plus experimental treatment

Device: AN Active tDCS
The tDCS active stimulations will be directed to PFC regions for six weeks delivered for three times a week. tDCS will be delivered by a battery driven, constant current stimulator through a pair of saline-soaked sponge electrodes kept firm by elastic bands. The anode will be placed on the left PFC, F3 position according to the 10-20 international EEG system for electrode placement, while the cathode will be placed on the right PFC, F4 position according to the 10-20 international EEG system for electrode placement. Stimulation intensity will be set at 1 milliampere (mA), the duration of stimulation will be 20 min.
Other Names:
  • Brain Stim
  • Sham Comparator: AN Sham tDCS

    Treatment "as usual" plus placebo treatment

    Device: AN Sham tDCS
    The same electrode placement will be used as in the stimulation conditions (left anodal/right cathodal), but the current will be applied for 30 s and will be ramped down without the participants awareness, and will be held three times a week for six weeks.
    Other Names:
  • Brain Stim Sham
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The primary end-point of the study is the variance on eating psychopathology at T1, assessed as changes in Eating Disorder Risk score (EDRC) of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-3). [6 weeks]

      It has been considered clinically significant a variation of at least 1 point of EDRC score of EDI-3 (about half standard deviation value), where higher scores mean a worse outcome. Conversely, no clinically significant variation has been considered a minimal increment of about 0.2 point of EDRC score of EDI-3, the increment we expect from TAU plus the placebo condition.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Significant changes in the total scores of AN symptomatology measures as Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) [12 months follow up]

      The EAT-26 proposes a cut-off score of 20. Scores of 20 or higher were considered clinically significant.

    2. Significant changes in the total scores of AN symptomatology measures as Body Uneasiness Test (BUT). [12 months follow up]

      The BUT proposes a cut-off score of 1,2. Scores of 1,2 or higher were considered clinically significant.

    3. Significant changes in the total scores of other psychopathological measures as Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 6-18). [12 months follow up]

      The CBCL 6-18 generates a T-score for each subscale. According to normative data, a T-score above 64 was considered to be significant for the 3 broadband scales, whereas for the syndrome scales, the cut-off for clinical significance was 70.

    4. Significant changes in the total scores of other psychopathological measures as Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). [12 months follow up]

      Raw scores were converted to T-scores. According to normative data, a T-score above 64 was considered clinical significance.

    5. Significant changes in the total scores of other psychopathological measures as Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC). [12 months follow up]

      Raw scores were converted to T-scores. According to normative data, a T-score above 64 was considered clinical significance.

    6. Significant changes in the physiological measures specifically the BMI index [12 months follow up]

    7. Number of participants with abnormal laboratory blood test results. [12 months follow up]

    8. Significant changes in the endogenous stress response, measured with Cortisol Awakening Response (CAR). [12 months follow up]

    9. Significant changes in intra-cortical inhibitory/excitatory motor circuits using paired pulse TMS, measured as short intracortical inhibition and facilitation. [6 weeks]

      the ratio between MEPs amplitude conditioning stimulus and MEPs amplitude test stimulus alone for each ISI.

    10. Significant changes in sensory-motor integration using paired pulse TMS, measured as SICI/ICF: the ratio between MEPs amplitude (mV) conditioning stimulus (electrical stimulation) and MEP amplitude test stimulus alone for each ISI. [6 weeks]

    11. Significant changes in cortical oscillatory patterns (synchronization and desynchronization) in theta, alpha and beta frequencies (Hz) over motor and premotor cortex, using TMS-EEG co-registration. [6 weeks]

    12. Significant changes in cortical connectivity using TMS-EEG co-registration combined to report the analysis of the waveform, latency and cortical distribution of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) in micronV. [6 weeks]

    13. Significant changes in cortical reactivity in terms of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) amplitude for time domain (micronV) and frequency bands for spatial domain (Hz), using TMS-EEG co-registration. [6 weeks]

    14. Significant changes in Cortical Plasticity evoked by repetitive TMS in terms of different MEP amplitude (mV) recorded at different time-points after repetitive TMS perturbations. [6 weeks]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    10 Years to 18 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • diagnosis of AN according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition - DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association & American Psychiatric Association, 2013);

    • condition of under-weight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2);

    • intelligence quotient higher or equal to 85 (IQ ≥ 85);

    • ability to give informed consent under parents' surveillance and guidance

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • a personal history of neurological/medical/genetic diseases;

    • a personal history of epilepsy;

    • suicide risk;

    • receiving CNS-active drug, other counseling or psychological therapies during the treatment.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute Rome Italy 00165

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Floriana Costanzo, Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
    • Study Chair: Stefano Vicari, Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05674266
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 763_OPBG_2014_BIS
    First Posted:
    Jan 6, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 11, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2022
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 11, 2023