COVANOS: Anosmia and Covid-19

Sponsor
University College, London (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05246059
Collaborator
(none)
63
4
2
14.2
15.8
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Our study aims to determine the prevalence of anosmia in patients SARS-Cov-2/Covid-19 infection (both by symptom reporting and smell testing), the efficacy of early olfactory training for the treatment of anosmia caused by infection and the long-term impact of smell dysfunction with a one-year follow-up.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Olfactory Training
N/A

Detailed Description

Around 10-15% of patients with acquired anosmia have Post Viral Olfactory Loss (PVOL). Coronaviruses are a known cause for anosmia. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, reports from China, South Korea, US and Europe suggest that a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients describe a loss of smell and taste as the only symptoms or as part of mild flu-like symptoms. It is now well-established that these symptoms are important components of the COVID-19 sequelae with persistent dysfunction described in a subset of individuals.

For this study, individuals, mainly comprising mainly healthcare workers in the UK, with persistent and sudden loss of sense of smell (at least 4 weeks) were recruited to ascertain the prevalence of COVID-19 associated smell dysfunction. A positive COVID-19 test was not a requirement for participation if not readily available nor accessible, however, information regarding COVID-19 antigen and antibody testing was collected post-hoc from those for who data are readily available. All participants (n=227) underwent initial psychophysical smell testing using the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT), gustatory testing using Taste Strips and completed the Smell Qx questionnaire. This questionnaire collected relevant demographic information, medical history, details of COVID-19 symptoms experienced, as well as information on olfactory and gustatory function, including those related to quality-of-life.

Participants, who scored 8 or below on the BSIT (indicative of semi-quantitative smell loss) were further invited to participate in the early olfactory training randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to undergo either 12 weeks of olfactory training or receive safety information. At the end of the 12-weeks, participants completed a follow-up BSIT and survey.

All participants enrolled at baseline within the eligible timeframe, for whom a valid email address was available, were further invited to participate in 1 year follow-up assessments. This included all participants irrespective of baseline BSIT result and RCT participation. The follow-up included a final electronic survey and BSIT. In addition to questions related to their sense of smell, which were identical to those in the baseline and 12-week follow-up surveys, participants were also asked about any symptoms of long-Covid.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
63 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
SARS-CoV-2 Infection/Covid-19 and Anosmia - Prevalence Study, Molecular Analysis and Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 3, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 8, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 8, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control

12 weeks of observation, safety information provided

Experimental: Treatment

12-weeks of daily olfactory training

Other: Olfactory Training
Sniffin' Sticks (Duft-Quartett, Burghart Messtechnik, GmbH, Germany)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) [12-weeks]

    The absolute difference between the intervention and control arms in BSIT score smell improvement, measured as a change from baseline at 12-weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of Life Score [12-weeks]

    Within subject changes to scoring of questionnaire quality of life items at 12-weeks compared to baseline

  2. Compliance (anecdotal) [12-weeks]

    Participant compliance to olfactory training through anecdotal reporting

  3. Safety (anecdotal) [12-weeks]

    Safety of the use of Sniffin' Sticks through anecdotal reporting

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Confirmed (positive laboratory antigen test) or suspected COVID-19 infection

  • Sudden onset of smell loss

  • Smell loss of at least 4 weeks

  • Reduced smell function through psycho-physical testing (Brief Smell Identification Test score of 8 or less)

Exclusion Criteria:

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust London England United Kingdom
2 Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London England United Kingdom
3 Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust Wigan England United Kingdom
4 James Paget and Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals Gorleston-on-Sea Great Yarmouth United Kingdom

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University College, London

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Valerie J. Lund, MD FRCS, University College, London
  • Principal Investigator: Matt Lechner, MD FRCS, University College London, Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University College, London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05246059
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EDGE132692
  • IRAS No. 283758
First Posted:
Feb 18, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Feb 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 18, 2022