LCA IRM: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Residual Rotational Laxity for Single Versus Double Bundle Techniques
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare, using MRI measures with a specialized splint, the persistent rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques, between the seventh and eighth months after surgery, and for different degrees of knee flexion (0 °, 20 °, 40 °, 60 °).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Single Bundle These patients are operated using a single bundle technique. |
Procedure: Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Single bundle anterior cruciate ligamentoplasty
|
Experimental: Double bundle These patients are operated using a double bundle technique. |
Procedure: Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Double bundle anterior cruciate ligamentoplasty
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Residual rotational laxity during MRI [7-8 months post-op]
Residual rotational laxity is defined as the difference between the operated knee and the non-operated knee for "D", where D is the distance between the posterior tibial cortex and the center of the circle which forms the lateral femoral condyle. D will be evaluated at 4 angles of flexion (0°, 20°, 40° and 60°) and evaluated as a repeated measure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Lysholm score [7-8 months]
- International Knee Documentation Committee score [7-8 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
-
The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
-
The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
-
The patient requires reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to rupture confirmed by MRI
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
-
The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
-
The patient refuses to sign the consent
-
It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
-
The patient is pregnant
-
The patient is breastfeeding
-
The patient require a single bundle, "KJ-type" surgical technique
-
Contra-indication for MRI scans
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes | Nîmes Cedex 09 | Gard | France | 30029 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philippe Marchand, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- LOCAL/2011/PM-03
- 2011-A00465-36