Effect of Sodium Alendronate on the Final Implant Stability.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
evaluation of the final implant stability after its placement in sockets preserved with two different socket preservation materials
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Early Phase 1 |
Detailed Description
compare the stability of implant placement using Osstell ISQ "resonance frequency analyzer", and marginal bone resorption and bone density around implant by X-ray analysis in different socket preservation techniques comparing sodium alendronate with the sticky bone graft technique
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: implant placement in defective Sockets preserved with alendronic acid sponge anesthesia according the site of implant placement were administered using mepivacaine HCl (2%) with levonordefrin 1:20 000 (Scandonest 2%; Septodont, Saint- Maur-des-Fossés, France). Injection to control pain and bleeding for hemostasis. Crestal incision with a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected .A pilot drill will be used to start the osteotomy preparation, then different drilling sizes will be used to attain the final drill size and the planed implant height and width according to Cone Beam CT. Implants were screwed directly into the osteotomy site, primarily the screwing was done mechanically by Fixture Mount Connection attached to the implant carrier. The created gap sutured passively to allow tension-free interrupted closure using 3-0 coated undyed braided polyglactin 910 suture material. |
Procedure: Socket Preservation technique
Implant placement after Socket preservation Technique with sodium alderonate versus sticky bone in salama&salama Class 3 labial wall defect
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Implant placement in Defective sockets preserved with sticky bone anesthesia according the site of implant placement were administered using mepivacaine HCl (2%) with levonordefrin 1:20 000 (Scandonest 2%; Septodont, Saint- Maur-des-Fossés, France). Injection to control pain and bleeding for hemostasis. Crestal incision with a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected .A pilot drill will be used to start the osteotomy preparation, then different drilling sizes will be used to attain the final drill size and the planed implant height and width according to Cone Beam CT. Implants were screwed directly into the osteotomy site, primarily the screwing was done mechanically by Fixture Mount Connection attached to the implant carrier. The created gap sutured passively to allow tension-free interrupted closure using 3-0 coated undyed braided polyglactin 910 suture material. |
Procedure: Socket Preservation technique
Implant placement after Socket preservation Technique with sodium alderonate versus sticky bone in salama&salama Class 3 labial wall defect
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Implant stability [3-4 months after Dental implant placement]
Calculate the final implant stability of two groups using Osstell "resonance frequency analyzer"
Secondary Outcome Measures
- marginal bone [3-4 months after Dental implant placement]
Evaluation of marginal bone resorption around implant in two groups using superimposition x-ray (CBCT) software analysis
Other Outcome Measures
- Bone Density [3-4 months after Dental implant placement]
Evaluation of bone density around the placed implants using x-ray (CBCT) software analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with seeking implant drive prosthesis after socket has been preserved by either technique.
-
Patients with seeking implant drive prosthesis with Salama Class 3 defective sockets.
-
Both genders males and females will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
General contraindications to implant surgery.
-
Patient seeking immediate implant placement.
-
Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
-
Untreated periodontitis.
-
Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
-
Uncontrolled diabetes.
-
Pregnant or nursing.
-
Substance abuse.
-
Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
-
Severe bruxism or clenching.
-
Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
-
Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
-
Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
-
Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling.
-
Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly
-
followed. Referred only for implant placement or unable to attend a 5-year follow-up
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hossam Abdallah Mohammed Ghazally | Cairo | Manial | Egypt | 11553 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- omfs335