The DETOURS Trial: De-escalating Empiric Treatment: Opting Out of Rx for Selected Patients With Suspected Sepsis - Opt-Out Protocol Trial

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03517007
Collaborator
(none)
762
10
2
22.9
76.2
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to implement an opt-out protocol to guide appropriate de-escalation of antibiotics in qualifying patients. The protocol, determined over the course a year with the help of a large, well-rounded expert panel, will be used by pharmacists to recommend de-escalation of antibiotics to hospital providers. Providers can then decide whether or not to follow the recommendation in determining the best treatment pathway for his or her patient.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Opt-Out Protocol
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
762 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The DETOURS Trial: De-escalating Empiric Treatment: Opting Out of Rx for Selected Patients With Suspected Sepsis - Opt-Out Protocol Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 12, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 3, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 10, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Opt-Out Protocol

Should an eligible patient pass the safety screen and be randomized to the intervention arm of the trial, the designated pharmacist will approach the patient's primary provider in charge of antibiotic decision-making The pharmacist will inform the provider the patient's antibiotics can be de-escalated unless the provider opts out.

Other: Opt-Out Protocol
Should an eligible patient pass the safety screen and be randomized to the intervention arm of the trial, the designated pharmacist will approach the patient's primary provider in charge of antibiotic decision-making The pharmacist will inform the provider the patient's antibiotics can be de-escalated unless the provider opts out.

No Intervention: Standard of Care

Provider continues routine, standard of care on the patient.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall inpatient plus post-discharge antibacterial Days of Therapy (DOT) as measured by data collection [30 days post-randomization]

    Overall inpatient plus post-discharge antibacterial Days of Therapy (DOT) as measured by data collection

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Distributions of DOOR [up to 2 years]

    DOOR is defined as Desirability of Outcome Ranking, from Alive being a rank of 1 to Death being a rank of 6. DOOR will be applied to collected patient data.

  2. Negative outcomes as measured by individual clinical outcome components in the DOOR [30 days post-randomization]

    Negative outcomes as measured by individual clinical outcome components in the DOOR

  3. Negative outcomes as measured by length of hospital stay [30 days post-randomization]

    Negative outcomes as measured by length of hospital stay

  4. Negative outcomes as measured by re-initiation of antibiotic therapy after greater than 48 hours with no antibiotics [30 days post-randomization]

    Negative outcomes as measured by re-initiation of antibiotic therapy after greater than 48 hours with no antibiotics

  5. Negative outcomes as measured by number of days patient has a central line [30 days post-randomization]

    Negative outcomes as measured by number of days patient has a central line

  6. percent of eligible patients with antibiotic de-escalation [5 days from initial date of suspected sepsis]

    percent of eligible patients with antibiotic de-escalation

  7. Number of patients in whom the safety screen was applied [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for patients eligible for assessment of de-escalation

  8. Number of patients the safety screen excluded from the opt-out procedure [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for patients eligible for assessment of de-escalation

  9. number of eligible patients in whom the opt-out procedure was applied [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for patients eligible for assessment of de-escalation

  10. number of eligible patients in whom the prescriber chose to opt-out [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for patients eligible for assessment of de-escalation

  11. prescriber type [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for prescribers who chose to opt out

  12. prescribers' reported rationale for opting out [within 3 days (96 hours) of initial date of suspected sepsis]

    for prescribers who chose to opt out

  13. Percent of subjects who received an infectious disease consultation after implementation of the Opt-Out Protocol [30 days post-randomization]

    Percent of subjects who received an infectious disease consultation after implementation of the Opt-Out Protocol

  14. Days of therapy for specific sub-groups of patients, including patients whose physicians elected to opt-out of the intervention [30 days post-randomization]

    .Days of therapy for specific sub-groups of patients, including patients whose physicians elected to opt-out of the intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Blood culture preliminary results that indicate no growth as of 48-96 hours. (Exception: Patients with a single positive blood culture for coagulase negative Staphylococcus and no central line in place will also be included).

  • Still on broad spectrum antibiotic therapy after 48-96 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients who are located in ICU wards.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Piedmont Atlanta Hospital Atlanta Georgia United States 30309
2 Piedmont Fayette Hospital Fayetteville Georgia United States 30214
3 Piedmont Newnan Hospital Newnan Georgia United States 30265
4 Harvard Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02115
5 Duke University Durham North Carolina United States 27710
6 Southeastern Regional Medical Center Lumberton North Carolina United States 28358
7 Iredell Health System Statesville North Carolina United States 28677
8 Wilson Medical Center Wilson North Carolina United States 27893
9 Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
10 Pennsylvania Presbyterian Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Duke University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebekah Moehring, MD, MPH, Duke University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03517007
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00092813
First Posted:
May 7, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Aug 12, 2020
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Duke University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 12, 2020