TAAT: Treatment of Adolescent Antimuscarinic (Anticholinergic) Toxidrome
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Overdose of xenobiotics (antihistamines, antipsychotics, or Jimson Weed) with resulting antimuscarinic toxidrome is a common scenario in medical toxicology. The result of antagonism of muscarinic receptors is a constellation of signs and symptoms (toxidrome): mydriasis, decreased sweat, decreased bowel sounds, agitation, delirium, hallucinations, urinary retention, tachycardia, flushed skin and seizures. Two treatment options are physostigmine or benzodiazepines.
Although the antimuscarinic toxidrome occurs commonly, physostigmine has been used sparingly despite evidence of safety and efficacy. To demonstrate the utility and safety of physostigmine, the investigators propose a randomized clinical trial of physostigmine compared to benzodiazepine for antimuscarinic toxicity.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Physostigmine Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. |
Drug: Physostigmine
Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion
|
Experimental: Lorazepam Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. |
Drug: Lorazepam
Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: Before Bolus [Baseline, immediately before bolus]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement.
- Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: After Bolus [Immediately after bolus, up to 10 minutes post-Baseline]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement.
- Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: 4 Hours [4 hours]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement.
- Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: Before Bolus [Baseline, immediately before bolus]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported.
- Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: After Bolus [Immediately after bolus, up to 10 minutes post-Baseline]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported.
- Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: 4 Hours [4 hours]
Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Safety and Effectiveness of Physostigmine Infusion in the Setting of Antimuscarinic Toxidrome. [Up to 4 hours]
Evaluation of clinical antimuscarinic symptoms, along with presence of any adverse effects, during the infusion to report tolerability, safety profile, and effectiveness of the infusion. the number of participants exhibiting adverse events will be reported, by type.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age >=10 and < 18 years
-
Present to the Emergency Department or Intensive Care Unit for an antimuscarinic toxidrome from either a pharmaceutical agent such as antihistamine overdose, or natural toxins or products such as Datura stramonium
-
Antimuscarinic toxidrome will be defined with at least one central nervous system agitation effect (agitation, delirium, visual hallucinations, mumbling incomprehensible speech), and at least 2 peripheral nervous system adverse effect (mydriasis, dry mucus membranes, dry axillae, tachycardia, decreased bowel sounds).
-
Patients will also be required to have a RASS score of +2 to +4 on initial assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of seizures or seizure during acute clinical course
-
History of asthma or wheezing during clinical course Bradycardia (Heart Rate <60)
-
Concomitant use of atropine or choline ester or depolarizing neuromuscular blocker during present illness and hospital course
-
Diabetes gangrene, known intestinal obstruction or urogenital tract, vagotonic state
-
QRS interval > 120 ms on electrocardiogram
-
Known to be pregnant at the time of enrollment
-
Known ward of the state
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Children's Hospital Colorado | Aurora | Colorado | United States | 80045 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- American Academy of Clinical Toxicology
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: George S Wang, MD, University of Colorado, Denver
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 16-1730
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 9 | 10 |
COMPLETED | 9 | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 9 | 10 | 19 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
13.4
(1.4)
|
14.4
(1.3)
|
13.9
(1.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
5
55.6%
|
7
70%
|
12
63.2%
|
Male |
4
44.4%
|
3
30%
|
7
36.8%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
||
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
9
100%
|
10
100%
|
19
100%
|
Mean Heart Rate (Beats per minute) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Beats per minute] |
127
(18)
|
117
(10)
|
122
(14)
|
Mean Temperature (Celsius) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Celsius] |
37.3
(0.6)
|
37.1
(0.5)
|
37.2
(0.5)
|
Mean Respiratory Rate (Respirations per minute) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Respirations per minute] |
29
(7)
|
24
(4)
|
27
(5)
|
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg] |
131
(12)
|
127
(14)
|
129
(13)
|
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (nnHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [nnHg] |
80
(11)
|
88
(17)
|
84
(14)
|
Mean Oxygen Saturations (%Oxygen) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [%Oxygen] |
96
(2)
|
97
(3)
|
96
(2)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: Before Bolus |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement. |
Time Frame | Baseline, immediately before bolus |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
1.5
|
1
|
Title | Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: After Bolus |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement. |
Time Frame | Immediately after bolus, up to 10 minutes post-Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
0
|
1
|
Title | Comparison of RASS Score Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: 4 Hours |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam for control of antimuscarinic agitation. Richmond Agitation Sedation Scores (RASS) will be compared throughout treatment protocol. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation and agitation. Possible scores range from -5 (unarousable) to 0 (alert & calm) to +4 (combative). Scores closer to 0 indicate a better outcome for this measurement. |
Time Frame | 4 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
0
|
0.25
|
Title | Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: Before Bolus |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported. |
Time Frame | Baseline, immediately before bolus |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
9
100%
|
9
90%
|
Title | Safety and Effectiveness of Physostigmine Infusion in the Setting of Antimuscarinic Toxidrome. |
---|---|
Description | Evaluation of clinical antimuscarinic symptoms, along with presence of any adverse effects, during the infusion to report tolerability, safety profile, and effectiveness of the infusion. the number of participants exhibiting adverse events will be reported, by type. |
Time Frame | Up to 4 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Seizures |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Bradycardia |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Bronchorrhea |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Bronchospasm |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Diaphoresis |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Intubation |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Vomiting |
1
11.1%
|
1
10%
|
Oversedation |
1
11.1%
|
1
10%
|
Title | Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: After Bolus |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported. |
Time Frame | Immediately after bolus, up to 10 minutes post-Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
4
44.4%
|
10
100%
|
Title | Comparison of the Effectiveness in Control of Delirium Between Physostigmine and Lorazepam: 4 Hours |
---|---|
Description | Determine the effectiveness of physostigmine as compared with lorazepam in the reversal of antimuscarinic delirium. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores will be evaluated throughout the study. This measurement is a dichotomous outcome ("yes" or "no" for presence of delirium is indicated rather than a score). The number of participants exhibiting delirium is reported. |
Time Frame | 4 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion |
Measure Participants | 9 | 10 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
2
22.2%
|
10
100%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 4 Hours | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Physostigmine | Lorazepam | ||
Arm/Group Description | Physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg IV bolus (max of 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes, followed by a 0.02 mg/kg/hr (max of 2 mg/hr) infusion for 4 hours. Physostigmine: Administration of physostigmine bolus followed by an infusion | Lorazepam 0.05 mg/kg IV bolus (max 2 mg), which can be repeated at 10 minutes if inadequate patient response, followed by a Normal Saline infusion for 4 hours. Lorazepam: Administration of lorazepam bolus followed by normal saline infusion | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Physostigmine | Lorazepam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/9 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Physostigmine | Lorazepam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/9 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Physostigmine | Lorazepam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/9 (22.2%) | 2/10 (20%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Vomitnig | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Oversedation | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. George Sam Wang |
---|---|
Organization | UColorado |
Phone | 303-724-9967 |
george.wang@childrenscolorado.org |
- 16-1730