Anxiety and Distress Levels in Women With Suspected Endometrial Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients attending the rapid access gynaecology clinic with a suspicion of endometrial cancer are understandably nervous. Few studies have quantified anxiety and distress of patients in this group.
This study surveys anxiety and stress levels of women attending clinic (by filling in an anonymous questionnaire). Additionally, in women who need a tissue biopsy, women are asked to rate their pain scores.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Aims:
Quantify the anxiety and stress levels of women attending the Rapid access gynaecology clinic with a suspicion of cancer
Background:
Endometrial cancer is a tumour originating in the endometrium (womb lining); it is the most common gynaecological cancer in the United Kingdom (UK). In 2012, there were almost 100,000 new cases diagnosed in Europe. Endometrial cancer classically presents with postmenopausal bleeding (bleeding after the menopause), or intermenstrual bleeding (bleeding in between periods).
Although routine management for these women does vary, in general a screening test is performed, typically a pelvic (internal) ultrasound to assess the endometrium (womb lining). In cases where the endometrial thickness is above the threshold for investigation -an endometrial biopsy (sampling cells from the womb lining) is indicated. Whilst well tolerated, this can be quite painful.
Once the endometrial biopsy is performed, it is sent to the histologist for further examination. Histological analysis may take several days and patients are either brought back to clinic for discussion of the results or are given a telephone appointment. The patient often will not know the result of the test for up to 2 weeks; thus causing a lot of unnecessary anxiety and distress.
The study:
Patients attending the Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic will be invited to participate in the study by filling in a short anonymous survey.
Additionally, patients undergoing a tissue biopsy sample will be asked to provide a pain score, followed by a brief interview to ascertain if they would undergo the procedure again if it was needed and how they tolerated the procedure. Additionally, the time taken to perform the procedure will be recorded.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Anxiety Score for Patients Attending Clinic [Immediately before clinic (waiting room)]
GAD 7 score - (Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7 score). 7 items each measured and score summated. Scale 0-21.Cut offs 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16+ correlate with anxiety score. Higher levels = worse anxiety
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Pain Score if Needing a Tissue Biopsy [Immediately after tissue sample taken.]
Patients asked to rank Pain score (using visual analogue score standardised tool), 0 to 10 score, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain in their life.
- Time Taken for Tissue Sample to be Performed [During tissue biopsy time]
Measure time taken to perform tissue sample (in minutes) from insertion to removal of speculum.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All women presenting to rapid access gynaecology clinic with suspected gynaecological cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Anyone lacking capacity.
-
<18years old.
-
Pregnant.
-
Anyone unable to understand English (in absence of translator)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Queen Charlotte and Hammersmith Hospital | London | United Kingdom | W12 0HS |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Imperial College London
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 16HH3687 Psych Study EC
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Consective patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time, with suspected endometrial cancer between July 2018 and April 2019 |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 250 |
COMPLETED | 250 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Consecutive patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time with suspected endometrial cancer. |
Overall Participants | 250 |
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
<30 |
13
5.2%
|
30-39 |
15
6%
|
40-49 |
43
17.2%
|
50-59 |
88
35.2%
|
60-69 |
56
22.4%
|
70-79 |
25
10%
|
80+ |
10
4%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
250
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
Caucasian |
141
56.4%
|
Black/Afro-carribean |
34
13.6%
|
Asian |
35
14%
|
Mixed |
5
2%
|
Other |
33
13.2%
|
Prefer not to say |
2
0.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United Kingdom |
250
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Anxiety Score for Patients Attending Clinic |
---|---|
Description | GAD 7 score - (Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7 score). 7 items each measured and score summated. Scale 0-21.Cut offs 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16+ correlate with anxiety score. Higher levels = worse anxiety |
Time Frame | Immediately before clinic (waiting room) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
GAD 7 scores were calculated for each patient |
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time with suspected endometrial cancer. |
Measure Participants | 250 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
6
|
Title | Pain Score if Needing a Tissue Biopsy |
---|---|
Description | Patients asked to rank Pain score (using visual analogue score standardised tool), 0 to 10 score, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain in their life. |
Time Frame | Immediately after tissue sample taken. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 23 women required a tissue biopsy |
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Consecutive patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time with suspected endometrial cancer. |
Measure Participants | 23 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
5.5
|
Title | Time Taken for Tissue Sample to be Performed |
---|---|
Description | Measure time taken to perform tissue sample (in minutes) from insertion to removal of speculum. |
Time Frame | During tissue biopsy time |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time. |
Measure Participants | 23 |
Mean (Inter-Quartile Range) [Minutes] |
5.5
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Survey and paired observational study. No additional interventions performed (pipelle biopsies were part of standard of care) so adverse effects specifically due to study should be zero. Having said that, the time and pain score for pipelle biopsies were observed and recorded as part of this study and complications for pipelle biopsy were recorded. Any complications for a tissue biopsy would be apparent immediately, so time frame post biopsy 20 minutes. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Survey and Observational study. | |
Arm/Group Title | All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic | |
Arm/Group Description | All patients attending Rapid access Gynaecology Clinic for the first time. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/250 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/250 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
All Patients Attending Rapid Access Gynaecology Clinic | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/250 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr Diana Marcus |
---|---|
Organization | Imperial College London |
Phone | 07525133957 |
d.marcus16@imperial.ac.uk |
- 16HH3687 Psych Study EC