HEADSTART: Hemiarch vs Extended Arch in Type 1 Aortic Dissection

Sponsor
University of Calgary (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03885635
Collaborator
(none)
182
4
2
70.5
45.5
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

HEADSTART is a prospective, open-label, non-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compares a composite of mortality and re-intervention in patients undergoing hemiarch and extended arch repair for acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection. Eligible patients will be randomized to one or the other surgical strategy and clinical and imaging outcome data will be collected over a 3 year follow up period.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Hemiarch repair
  • Procedure: Extended arch repair
N/A

Detailed Description

DeBakey Type 1 aortic dissections continue to have high operative mortality and morbidity and there is equipoise in available literature with regards to the best operative strategy and patient selection criteria. Hemiarch repair is current standard of care in most centers but extended arch repair is gaining popularity aiming to address early post-operative malperfusion and improve long term aortic remodeling.

HEADSTART is a randomized controlled prospective trial of patients presenting to participating institutes with acute DeBakey 1 aortic dissection. Patients will be enrolled and randomized into one of two groups - 'hemiarch repair' and 'extended arch repair'. Pre-operative, early post-operative and long term follow clinical and CT imaging data will be collated on a centralized database and at a core lab respectively.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
182 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Hemiarch vs. extended arch repair in the setting of acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissectionsHemiarch vs. extended arch repair in the setting of acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissections
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Hemiarch vs Extended Arch in Aortic Dissection - a SystemaTic Analysis by Randomized Trial (HEADSTART)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 15, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Hemiarch repair

Standard hemiarch repair with open distal anastomosis in the proximal arch without replacement of the head vessels.

Procedure: Hemiarch repair
Current standard of surgical repair consisting of ascending aortic replacement with open distal anastomosis at level of proximal arch under a period of hypothermic circulatory arrest . No surgical or endovascular intervention is carried out in the mid arch or descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.

Active Comparator: Extended arch repair

Ascending aortic and arch replacement with or without head vessel re-implantation and single TEVAR device placement within 1 week.

Procedure: Extended arch repair
Surgical replacement of the ascending aorta along with intervention on the arch and descending aorta. Techniques for distal aspect of extended arch technique include but are not limited to total arch replacement along with TEVAR, Frozen Elephant Trunk procedure or surgical proximal arch replacement with bare metal stents in arch and descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of patients experiencing a composite end-point of mortality or re-intervention [3 years]

    Compare the proportion of patients between the two groups who over a 3 year follow up period attain a composite clinical end-point of 1) mortality, 2) late aortic re-intervention, either surgical or endovascular (> 30 days from index procedure) or 3) early (< 30 days from index procedure) re-intervention for branch malperfusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of patients achieving complete false lumen thrombosis on CT imaging [3 years]

    Compare the proportions of patients achieving complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis in the proximal, mid and distal descending thoracic aorta at 3 years after intervention between the two groups

  2. Delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL: Ao) [1 month]

    Compare delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL:Ao) in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta from pre-operative to first post-operative CT scans, between the two groups.

  3. Delta change in maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic aortic dimension [3 years]

    Compare delta change in the maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic dimension between the two groups over 3 years

  4. Number of patients experiencing the listed peri-operative complications [1 month]

    To compare the proportion of patients experiencing the following peri-operative complications between the two groups: mortality, stroke, paraplegia/paraparesis, vascular injury, renal ischemia, bowel ischemia warranting operative intervention, peripheral limb ischemic changes and re-operation for bleeding.

  5. Number of patients requiring open surgical or endovascular re-intervention [3 years]

    Compare the proportion of patients requiring open surgical and endovascular re-intervention over 3 years in both groups

  6. Preoperative malperfusion and perioperative mortality/early re-intervention [1 month]

    Correlate pre-operative CT signs of malperfusion with peri-operative mortality and early post-operative re-intervention in both groups

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Emergent surgical repair of Acute DeBakey Type 1 aortic dissection

  2. Age >18 years and <70 years

  3. Operating surgeon believes that both surgeries could be safe and effective

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Hemodynamic instability/shock defined as systolic BP < 90 mm Hg

  2. Previous cardiac surgery with sternotomy or thoracic endograft placement

  3. Aortic arch diameter > 6cm in which a concomitant arch replacement is judged necessary

  4. Procedures deemed to be "salvage operations" where the patient is unlikely to survive hospital discharge.

  5. GCS < 8 for more than 6 hours

  6. History of cirrhosis.

  7. History of chronic renal failure (baseline eGFR < 50)

  8. Metastatic malignancy

  9. Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada T2N2T9
2 Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G2B7
3 New Brunswick Heart Centre Saint John New Brunswick Canada E2L4L2
4 London Health Sciences Centre London Ontario Canada N6A5A5

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Calgary

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vamshi Kotha, MD, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: Jehangir Appoo, MD, University of Calgary

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Vamshi Kotha, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Calgary
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03885635
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HEADSTART
First Posted:
Mar 21, 2019
Last Update Posted:
May 17, 2019
Last Verified:
May 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 17, 2019