Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

Sponsor
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05864625
Collaborator
(none)
52
1
2
14
3.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Remimazolam besylate
  • Drug: Propofol/ Sevoflurane
N/A

Detailed Description

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
52 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Remimazolam

Induction dose of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL are injected together. When patient loses consciousness, rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg is given and endotracheal intubation is performed after confirming that TOF count is less than one. Anesthesia is maintained by using remimazolam dose of 1mg/kg/h~2mg/kg/h with remifentanil to maintain optimal depth of anesthesia, which will checked by Sedline value between 25 to 50.

Drug: Remimazolam besylate
During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.
Other Names:
  • Remimazolam besylate, Byfavo Inj., Hana Pharm Col, Ltd., Seoul, Korea
  • Active Comparator: Propofol/sevoflurane

    1% propofol 1-2mg/kg is injected with remifentanil TCI 1~4, and when patient loses consciousness, sevoflurane is started and rocuronium 0.8mg/kg is given. After confirming that TOF count is less than one, intubation is performed and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil to keep the Sedline value between 25 and 50.

    Drug: Propofol/ Sevoflurane
    During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.
    Other Names:
  • Fresofol 1% TM, Fresenius
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used. [Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia]

      Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used during anesthesia will be compared between two groups.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Hypotension and bradycardia event duration [Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia]

      Hypotension and bradycardia event duration will be compared

    2. Extubation time [End of anesthesia to extubation]

      Extubation time between the two groups will be compared

    3. Emergence agitation [Arrival of patient at ICU]

      Emergence agitation will be compared between the two groups using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale upon arrival at ICU. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale uses a numeric score from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation)to assess the level of patient sedation and identifies seven levels of sedation and agitation, which range from deep sedation (unarousable) to dangerous agitation.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    19 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients over 19 years old

    • Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol

    • Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption

    • Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40

    • Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term

    • Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation

    • Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis

    • Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma

    • Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve

    • Emergency operation

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital Yangsan Gyeongsangnam-do Korea, Republic of 50612

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Hee Young Kim, MD, PhD, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Kim Hee Young, Assistant professor for fund, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05864625
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2023-0191
    First Posted:
    May 18, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    May 22, 2023
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Kim Hee Young, Assistant professor for fund, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 22, 2023