PCT for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Stroke Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Given the evolving uses of technology in rehabilitation, the investigators aimed to measure the change in aphasia severity using PCT App, a digital therapeutic adapted from Constant Therapy (CT), a dynamic, personalized therapy program for people with cognitive, speech, or language disorders.
The entire study, including recruitment, enrollment, assessment and treatment were conducted remotely.
The proposed pilot study seeks to compare performance of PCT therapy vs. conventional workbook intervention for stroke patients. The investigators hypothesize that the experimental (PCT) group will experience greater gains on the WAB-AQ at follow-up compared to baseline compared to a control (workbook) group.
Subjects were prospectively assigned to an experimental or active control group in a random order with both groups balanced for their baseline level of speech, language and/or cognitive ability:
-
Experimental Group: Participants were instructed to use PCT for at least 30 minutes/day, 5 days/week. Performance and usage data were automatically reported by the PCT software to the treating clinician and was used to modify task assignment over time and monitor participant adherence to the treatment program.
-
Active Control Group: Participants were provided with a standard regime of paper workbooks (e.g. Workbook for Aphasia; Brubaker, 2006) that are typically used by clinicians with persons with aphasia (PWA) for at least 30 minutes/day, 5 days/week. Notably, the control procedure employed here is similar to a large-scale study examining technology as a treatment option by Palmer and colleagues (2015).
The treatment period was 10 weeks. All participants received a bimonthly check-in through video-chat with a member of the research staff during the treatment period.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Experimental Group At the start of the study, subjects will be provided with a tablet with videoconferencing software and the PCT app pre-installed. Research staff will remotely setup a PCT account for the subjects, and provide instructions for logging into the PCT application. During the treatment period, patients will be instructed to use PCT for at least 30 minutes a day and at least 5 days a week. Performance data (accuracy and latency) will be reported by the PCT software to the treating clinician and will be used to modify task assignment over time. PCT tracks usage of the program so that research staff can access automated reporting of subject use to monitor participant adherence to the treatment program. |
Other: PCT
PCT is designed to deliver similar therapy as is conventionally provided in-clinic by a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP), which the patient can access from any location using the application installed on a supported tablet. The device functions by allowing clinicians to create a personalized therapy program for each patient from 75 categories of clinical therapies, which patients may access from their tablet device remotely. The PCT software is comprised primarily of authentication and an algorithm that suggests advancement of the therapy program based on observed patient deficits and progress.
|
| Active Comparator: Control Group 1 [Conventional Workbook Therapy] At the start of the study, subjects will be provided with a tablet with videoconferencing software and the PCT app pre-installed. Subjects in the control group will be told they will have access to 3-months of PCT after their participation in the study has concluded. Subjects in this group will be provided with a standard regime of paper workbooks and instructions to complete approximately 30 minutes a day at least 5 days a week. |
Other: Workbooks
Subjects in this group will be provided with a standard regime of paper workbooks (e.g. Workbook for Aphasia: Exercises for Expressive and Receptive Language Functioning; Brubaker, 2006) that are typically used by clinicians to practice therapy tasks with individuals. Notably, the control procedure employed here is similar to that employed on a large-scale study examining technology as a treatment option and involved usual care control group by Palmer and colleagues (2015).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Aphasia Quotient (WAB-AQ) [Baseline assessment]
The WAB-R is a standardized tool that assesses language and cognitive skills and provides scores quantifying the impact of a stroke on those skills. The Aphasia Quotient from the WAB-R includes segments from Part 1 of the assessment, evaluating spontaneous speech including fluency and information content, auditory comprehension, naming, and repetition.
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Aphasia Quotient (WAB-AQ) [Follow-up assessment 10-12 weeks post baseline]
The WAB-R is a standardized tool that assesses language and cognitive skills and provides scores quantifying the impact of a stroke on those skills. The Aphasia Quotient from the WAB-R includes segments from Part 1 of the assessment, evaluating spontaneous speech including fluency and information content, auditory comprehension, naming, and repetition.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Cortical Quotient (WAB-CQ) [Baseline assessment]
The Cortical Quotient as obtained from the WAB-R Parts 1 and 2 was utilized as secondary outcome measures. Part 2 of the WAB-R includes reading, writing, apraxia, constructional, visuospatial, and calculation sections.
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Cortical Quotient (WAB-CQ) [Follow-up assessment 10-12 weeks post baseline]
The Cortical Quotient as obtained from the WAB-R Parts 1 and 2 was utilized as secondary outcome measures. Part 2 of the WAB-R includes reading, writing, apraxia, constructional, visuospatial, and calculation sections.
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Language Quotient (WAB-LQ) [Baseline assessment]
The Language Quotient as obtained from the WAB-R Parts 1 and 2 was utilized as secondary outcome measures. Part 2 of the WAB-R informing the Language Quotients includes reading and writing sections.
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised, Language Quotient (WAB-LQ) [Follow-up assessment 10-12 weeks post baseline]
The Language Quotient as obtained from the WAB-R Parts 1 and 2 was utilized as secondary outcome measures. Part 2 of the WAB-R informing the Language Quotients includes reading and writing sections.
- Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) [Baseline assessment]
The BTACT is a brief, remote, cognitive assessment that evaluates memory for and judgments about words and numbers. It includes tasks such as recall tasks, both immediate and short term, category fluency, and number reasoning and manipulation tasks.
- Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) [Follow-up assessment 10-12 weeks post baseline]
The BTACT is a brief, remote, cognitive assessment that evaluates memory for and judgments about words and numbers. It includes tasks such as recall tasks, both immediate and short term, category fluency, and number reasoning and manipulation tasks.
- Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale 39 (SAQOL-39) [Baseline assessment]
The SAQOL-39 is a structured quality of life questionnaire administered to either a patient or a caregiver. It assesses the impact of a stroke on daily activities, communication, emotions, and family and social life by asking patients or caregivers to complete a 5 point rating scale in response to specific questions focusing on the past week alone.
- Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale 39 (SAQOL-39) [Follow-up assessment 10-12 weeks post baseline]
The SAQOL-39 is a structured quality of life questionnaire administered to either a patient or a caregiver. It assesses the impact of a stroke on daily activities, communication, emotions, and family and social life by asking patients or caregivers to complete a 5 point rating scale in response to specific questions focusing on the past week alone.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
-
Have diagnosis of stroke involving a hemorrhage or ischemic event, resulting in speech, language, and/or cognitive deficits
-
Have time post-stroke of at least 4 months prior to enrollment
-
Have been discharged from rehabilitation hospital
-
Are adults (aged 18 years or older) at the time of consent
-
Exhibit clinically confirmed speech, language, and/or cognitive deficits based on medical records
-
Are fluent English speakers
-
Have confirmed aphasia using the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (score of 90 or lower; 93.8 is cutoff for normal scores)
-
Have a presence of a family member or caregiver who is willing and able to provide assistance during the duration of study period
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Have comorbid neurological conditions that could impair study participation in the opinion of the investigator, such as dementia or Parkinson's disease
-
Currently require inpatient care or acute care
-
Are currently undergoing related one-on-one individual therapy at a hospital, rehabilitation facility, university, or at home
-
Exhibit severe apraxia of speech or severe dysarthria of speech, as verified by a clinician and confirmed by the WAB-R (and the Screen for Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech if necessary), and/or medical records
-
Have comorbid psychiatric conditions that could impair study participation in the opinion of the investigator, including such as schizophrenia or major depressive disorder, as indicated by medical records
-
Have uncorrected hearing or vision loss
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Learning Corp | Newton | Massachusetts | United States | 02458 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- The Learning Corp
Investigators
- Study Director: Swathi Kiran, PhD, CCC-SLP, The Learning Corp
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Caute A, Northcott S, Clarkson L, Pring T, Hilari K. Does mode of administration affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after stroke? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;14(4):329-37. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.663789. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
- Dekhtyar M, Braun EJ, Billot A, Foo L, Kiran S. Videoconference Administration of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised: Feasibility and Validity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 May 8;29(2):673-687. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00023. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
- Palmer R, Witts H, Chater T. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK? PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200096. eCollection 2018.
- Tun PA, Lachman ME. Telephone assessment of cognitive function in adulthood: the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone. Age Ageing. 2006 Nov;35(6):629-32. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
- TLC-PCT-Pilot