Spaced Retrieval as Treatment for Aphasia

Sponsor
Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04623125
Collaborator
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (Other)
20
1
1
15
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Spaced Repetition training has been found to be more effective than massed repetition for individuals with aphasia. This study seeks to examine the relative efficiency of three kinds of spacing for picture-naming training: traditional random presentation, non-adaptive spaced repetition, and adaptive spaced repetition.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Spaced Retrieval Practice
N/A

Detailed Description

Participants undergo a screening evaluation including the Quick Aphasia Battery (administered via teleconferencing software), and a preliminary picture naming test of approximately 300 pictures, used to select individual items for treatment. Participants then undertake online picture naming training for 30 minutes a day, over two weeks. Pictures are repeated according to three different schedules to be compared: random presentation, non-adaptive spaced repetition, and adaptive spaced repetition. We compare the number of pictures successfully learned and the verbal reaction time for the pictures assigned to the three conditions.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Spaced Retrieval as Treatment for Aphasia: Does Adaptive Spacing Enhance Picture Naming Performance?
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Spaced Repetition

Two weeks (10 sessions) of online picture-naming training with 60 words.

Behavioral: Spaced Retrieval Practice
Online picture-naming training with 60 words which the participant experiences word-retrieval difficulties. Cards are shuffled arranged by the computerized training program.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Picture Naming performance across conditions [Change from baseline to post-intervention immediately after two weeks of daily sessions, and one month followup.]

    Word retention assessed after treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • presence of a post-stroke word finding deficit (i.e. aphasia), or primary progressive aphasia.

  • ability to evaluate the correctness of one's own responses when subsequently provided the with the correct answer

Exclusion Criteria:
  • diagnosis of a neurological disorder other than post-stroke or primary progressive aphasia

  • inability to evaluate the correctness of ones responses when subsequently provided with the correct answer

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Baycrest Health Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada M6A 2E1

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jed A. Meltzer, Ph.D, Senior Scientist, Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04623125
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16-43s
First Posted:
Nov 10, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Nov 10, 2020
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2020
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jed A. Meltzer, Ph.D, Senior Scientist, Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 10, 2020