Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Intensive Therapy in Aphasia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Intensive therapy for aphasia has been demonstrated to improve language functioning after stroke or other neurological injury. However, recovery is generally not complete and new therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve outcomes with motor therapy after stroke. This study will examine the feasibility of using tDCS with intensive language therapy as a way of enhancing language outcomes in aphasia
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Intensive therapy for aphasia has been demonstrated to improve language functioning after stroke or other neurological injury. However, recovery is generally not complete and new therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve outcomes with motor therapy after stroke. This study will examine the feasibility of using tDCS supplementing clinically determined intensive language therapy as a way of enhancing language outcomes in aphasia. Eligible clients enrolled in the University of Michigan Aphasia Program (UMAP) will be invited to participate in the study. Clients will receive 20 minutes of tDCS every day along with their usual treatment protocol. Pre and post testing will be completed to assess for improvement in language functioning. This is a feasibility and proof of concept study to determine if a randomized control trial should be pursued
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. |
Device: transcranial direct current stimulation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Controlled Oral Word Fluency [baseline and 4 weeks]
This test assesses the number of words that can be generated in one minute that begin with certain letters. The total number of words generated for three letters is derived. Higher scores represent better performance. Changes in word fluency were calculated as follows: number of words generated post tDCS minus number of words generated pre tDCS
- Change in Boston Naming Score [baseline and 4 weeks]
This test assesses confrontational naming ability to 60 line drawings. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores representing better performance. Outcome was derived as followed : Picture naming score post tDCS minus picture naming score pre tDCS
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Western Aphasia Quotient Score [baseline and 4 weeks]
severity of aphasia is measured by the Western Aphasia Battery Revised. The Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score ranges from 0-100, with 100 being a perfect score. Change in the AQ was derived as follows : AQ post tDCS minus AQ pre tDCS
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of aphasia
-
Enrolled in intensive therapy program at the University of Michigan Aphasia Program.
-
Ability to understand and give consent to treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
No metal implants or surgical devices
-
History of seizures
-
History of significant cognitive or psychiatric disturbance
-
Participant cannot be pregnant at the time of study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University Center for Language and Literacy | Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States | 48194 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Michigan
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carol Persad, PhD, University of Michigan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- HUM00108213
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 25 |
COMPLETED | 23 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation |
Overall Participants | 23 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
35
(11.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
5
21.7%
|
Male |
18
78.3%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Boston Naming Test (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.94
(5.97)
|
Controlled Oral Word Fluency (number of words) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [number of words] |
14.74
(10.27)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Controlled Oral Word Fluency |
---|---|
Description | This test assesses the number of words that can be generated in one minute that begin with certain letters. The total number of words generated for three letters is derived. Higher scores represent better performance. Changes in word fluency were calculated as follows: number of words generated post tDCS minus number of words generated pre tDCS |
Time Frame | baseline and 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
23 of the participants completed the study |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation |
Measure Participants | 23 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [number of words] |
3.1
(4.89)
|
Title | Change in Boston Naming Score |
---|---|
Description | This test assesses confrontational naming ability to 60 line drawings. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores representing better performance. Outcome was derived as followed : Picture naming score post tDCS minus picture naming score pre tDCS |
Time Frame | baseline and 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
23 of the 25 subjects completed the study and their data are analyzed here |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation |
Measure Participants | 23 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score] |
1.25
(3.96)
|
Title | Change in Western Aphasia Quotient Score |
---|---|
Description | severity of aphasia is measured by the Western Aphasia Battery Revised. The Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score ranges from 0-100, with 100 being a perfect score. Change in the AQ was derived as follows : AQ post tDCS minus AQ pre tDCS |
Time Frame | baseline and 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
23 subjects completed the study and their data were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation |
Measure Participants | 23 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [aphasia quotient score] |
8.57
(6.37)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 30 days | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | |
Arm/Group Description | tDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia. transcranial direct current stimulation | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/25 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/25 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/25 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Carol Persad |
---|---|
Organization | University of Michigan |
Phone | 734-615-8112 |
cpersad@umich.edu |
- HUM00108213