CsA+ATG+AVA vs. CsA+AVA for the Treatment of Newly-diagnosed SAA in the Elderly

Sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05996393
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
36
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, randonmized study. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. We wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly. Meanwhile, to explore the predictive factors of efficacy, to find out a safe and effective treatment strategy for the Elderly.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Aplastic anemia (AA) can be divided into severe AA (SAA) and non-severe AA (NSAA), according to the severity of the disease. For SAA patients with o condition of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, guideline recommended ciclosporin A (CsA) + anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) + thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) as the first-line therapy. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. However, the adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity and gasrointestinal disorder limit its application in elderly SAA.Compared with EPAG, AVA has no hepatotoxicity and less other adverse effects, but there was few studies for AA. Our previous study demonstrated that AVA was effective in 55% of refractory AA. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. Thus, we wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Ciclosporin + Antithymocyte Immunoglobulin + Avatrombpag Versus Ciclosporin + Avatrombpag for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia in the Elderly
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: CsA+ATG+AVA

Ciclosporine: 3-5 mg/kg/d orally, with ciclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 100-200 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered; Anti-human thymocyte: rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (r-ATG 3mg/kg/d) was administered intravenously for 5 days; Avatrombopag:60 mg/d orally, for a total of 24 weeks. Adjust the dose according to the platelet counts of patients.

Drug: Ciclosporin
3-5 mg/kg/d orally, trough concentrations: 100-200 ng/ml

Drug: Avatrombopag
60 mg/d orally, 24 weeks

Drug: Anti-Human Thymocyte Immunoglobulin, Rabbit
rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (r-ATG 3mg/kg/d), intravenously, 5 days;

Experimental: CsA+AVA

Ciclosporine: 3-5 mg/kg/d orally, with ciclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 100-200 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered; Avatrombopag:60 mg/d orally, for a total of 24 weeks. Adjust the dose according to the platelet counts of patients.

Drug: Ciclosporin
3-5 mg/kg/d orally, trough concentrations: 100-200 ng/ml

Drug: Avatrombopag
60 mg/d orally, 24 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall response rate [6 month]

    Proportion of patient who achieved partial response or complete response

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Complete response rate [6 month]

    Proportion of patient who achieved complete response (HGB>100g/L, PLT>100×109/L, ANC>1.0×109/L)

  2. Relapse rate [12 month]

    Proportion of patient who relapse

  3. Adverse event rate [3, 6, 12 month]

    Proportion of patient who adverse events

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia, aged greater than 60 years.

  2. Patients met the diagnostic criteria of severe aplastic anemia (SAA).

  3. Complete all screening assessments as outlined in the test protocol.

  4. Without or with no more than 1 month treatment of ciclosporine, tacrolimus, glucocortocoid, or TPO-RAs.

  5. Agree to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Known diagnosis of congenital hematopoietic failure disorders (e.g. Fanconi anemia) and other causes of cytopenia.

  2. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding and/or infection despite standard treatment.

  3. Patients with previous history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

  4. Patients with previous history of thrombosis in 1 year.

  5. Patients with concurrent malignancy.

  6. Those who are considered unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.

  7. Abnormal renal function: creatinine > 1.2 normal upper limit, albumin < 0.9 normal lower limit, or CLcr < 30 ml/min.

  8. Abnormal liver function: transaminase > 2.5 normal upper limit, or tota bilirubin > 2.5 normal upper limit.

  9. Patients with severe heart, liver or renal disease.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Peking union medical college hospital Beijing China

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Bing Han, Professor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05996393
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AVA-3
First Posted:
Aug 18, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 18, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 18, 2023