Online Field Test of an Appendicitis Decision Support Tool
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Decision Support Tool In this arm study participants saw a decision support tool consisting of a video and a interactive decision aid (www.appyornot.org). |
Behavioral: Appendicitis Decision Support Tool
Viewing of a decision support tool.
|
Active Comparator: Infographic Participant saw a static infographic providing information about the two treatments for appendicitis. |
Behavioral: Control Infographic
Viewing of a standardized infographic
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post Intervention [At time of enrollment]
Assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale comparing only participants in the intervention arm before and after viewing the decision support tool.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Decisional Conflict Between Arms [At time of enrollment]
Total score on the validated decisional conflict scale after viewing the intervention support tool or the control infographic. Scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores being worse.
- Acceptability [At time of enrollment]
Between arm comparison of the acceptability of the information presented to the participants rated on a 4 point acceptability scale with higher scores representing higher acceptability.
- Trust and Accuracy of Information [At time of enrollment]
Participants perception of the trustworthiness and accuracy of the information presented to them on a 5 point scale with higher scores representing a higher perceived trustworthiness and perceived accuracy.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: who live in the United States and who have not previously had appendicitis.
-
Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform with an approval rating of 95% or higher
-
Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform who live in the United States
-
Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turn Platform who have not previously had appendicitis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Employees or relatives of employees of the University of Washington
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Washington | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98195 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Washington
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Investigators
- Study Director: David R Flum, MD, MPH, University of Washington
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- STUDY00012210