DELTA: Comparison of Different PEEP Titration Strategies Using Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients With ARDS

Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04247477
Collaborator
(none)
22
1
2
6.5
3.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the this study is to assess the short term physiological effects of 3 ventilation strategies for adult patients with ARDS admitted to intensive care unit.

Two of those strategies are based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) monitoring.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
We use a crossover sequential model, with all 3 strategies tested in both arms. A reference strategy, based on the Express method (PEEP level adjusted to reach a plateau pressure of 28-30 cmH2O), is applied at the begining of the study and during a wash-out period (between the 2 periods of application of the 2 EIT-based strategies). The 2 EIT-based strategies are applied in a randomized order.We use a crossover sequential model, with all 3 strategies tested in both arms. A reference strategy, based on the Express method (PEEP level adjusted to reach a plateau pressure of 28-30 cmH2O), is applied at the begining of the study and during a wash-out period (between the 2 periods of application of the 2 EIT-based strategies). The 2 EIT-based strategies are applied in a randomized order.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Different Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titration Strategies Using ELectrical Impedance Tomography in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome : the DELTA Physiological Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 22, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 8, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 8, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: A-B-A-C

Four consecutive steps (45 min per step) are tested in the following order: Peep titration strategy according to Express method (A) - Peep titration strategy according to overdistension and collapse estimation (B) - Peep titration strategy according to Express method (A) - Peep titration strategy according to estimation of lung inhomogeneity (C)

Other: Ventilation strategy
Patients are ventilated in randomized order with three different ventilation strategies (A,B and C)

Experimental: A-C-A-B

Four consecutive steps (45 min per step) are tested in the following order: Peep titration strategy according to Express method (A) - Peep titration strategy according to estimation of lung inhomogeneity (C) - Peep titration strategy according to Express method (A) - Peep titration strategy according to overdistension and collapse estimation (B)

Other: Ventilation strategy
Patients are ventilated in randomized order with three different ventilation strategies (A,B and C)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in PaO2 (mmHg) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance!

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in PaCO2 (mmHg) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  2. Plateau pressure (cmH2O) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  3. Positive end expiratory pressure (cmH2O) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  4. Expiratory and inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (cmH2O) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  5. Regional ventilation distribution (%) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  6. Center of ventilation (%) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  7. Overdistension and collapsus (%) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  8. Global and regional end expiratory lung impedance changes (IU) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  9. End expiratory lung volume (mL) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  10. Blood pressure (mmHg) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  11. Heart rate (bpm) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

  12. Cardiac output (L/min) [Time : 0 ; 45 minutes ; 90 minutes ; 135 minutes ; 180 minutes]

    As it is a physiological study, all the outcomes will be analyzed with the same importance

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients with moderate to severe ARDS, defined by the Berlin consensus, at 12 to 48h from diagnosis

  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 150 mmHg

  • Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of a health care plan

  • Consent obtained from patient's SDM

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pneumothorax

  • Contraindication to the insertion of a nasogastric tube with an esophageal balloon

  • Contraindication to the use of Electrical impedance tomography

  • Pregnancy, lactating or parturient woman

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU Angers Angers France 49100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Angers

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Angers
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04247477
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 49RC19_0249
First Posted:
Jan 30, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Aug 2, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Angers
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 2, 2022