READS: The Educational ARDS Diagnosis Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Without rigorous, high-quality training materials, the results of the LUNG-SAFE study examining the global incidence and outcomes of severe lung failure (acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) could be confused by either under-recognition of patients with, or misclassification of patients without, ARDS. This problem has been previously identified with the use of the prior ARDS definitions, particularly in patients with milder severity of illness. Importantly, the chest x-ray criteria in the ARDS definition has demonstrated only moderate reliability when applied by experts, although this can be improved through the use of training radiographs (as will be used in this educational module). The investigators hypothesize that the training from the educational module will allow more accurate diagnosis of ARDS by data collectors/study coordinators participating in the LUNG-SAFE study.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In this LUNG-SAFE sub-study, the investigators will evaluate the effect of a brief online educational module on correctly identifying patients (i.e., standardized cases) with ARDS according to the Berlin Definition.
The investigators hypothesize that the training from the educational module will allow more accurate diagnosis of ARDS according to the Berlin Definition by participating data collectors/study coordinators.
Data collectors and study coordinators from ICUs participating in LUNG-SAFE would be randomized (by simple random number generator) to one of the following online educational streams:
-
Educational module completion followed by evaluation
-
Evaluation followed by educational module completion
Limited demographic data will be collected from the respondents, along with their responses to the 15 multiple choice test questions. Time spent viewing the educational module will also be collected.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Educational Module First Respondents will complete the online educational module first, followed by the evaluation |
Other: Online Educational Module
A descriptive video detailing the diagnosis of ARDS according to the Berlin Definition, along with online educational materials available for review.
|
Placebo Comparator: Evaluation First Respondents will complete the the evaluation first, followed by the online educational module |
Other: Evaluation First (Placebo)
The respondents will view the descriptive video detailing the diagnosis of ARDS according to the Berlin Definition, along with online educational materials available for review only after they have completed the evaluation.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- ARDS Diagnosis [up to 4 weeks]
The number of correct responses to the evaluation component (15 multiple choice questions) of the educational module (in aggregate).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- ARDS Diagnosis [up to 4 weeks]
Number of correct responses to the evaluation component of the educational modules, separated by question type (vignettes vs. chest x-rays)
- Time [up to 4 weeks]
Amount of time spent completing the educational module
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Study coordinators/data collectors for the LUNG-SAFE study
Exclusion Criteria:
- No informed consent to participate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
2 | University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Toronto
- Unity Health Toronto
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eddy Fan, MD, PhD, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Gordon Rubenfeld, MD, MSc, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- READS1