Safety and Feasibility of Arrhythmia Ablation Using the Amigo Remote Robotic System as Compared With Manual Ablation

Sponsor
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01834872
Collaborator
Catheter Robotics, Inc. (Industry)
50
1
2
17.9
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the performance of Amigo RCS in ablation procedures for most common arrhythmias as compared to a conventional manual approach.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Amigo
  • Device: Manual ablation
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Safety and Feasibility of Arrhythmia Ablation Using the Amigo Remote Robotic System as Compared With Manual Ablation
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2014
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Amigo

Ablation completed with Amigo

Device: Amigo

Active Comparator: Manual

Ablation completed with manual catheter

Device: Manual ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Ablation Success [1 year]

    Global efficacy: Recurrence rate Re-do procedures Proportion of patients under anti arrhythmic treatment

  2. Safety Endpoint [1 Year]

    Any complications that could be attributed to the procedure during follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Acute Ablation Success [During Procedure]

    Accessory pathway: Anterograde and retrograde conduction block through the accessory Pathway Atrial fibrillation: % patients with all PV disconnected circumferential ablation with electrical disconnection of all pulmonary veins Common-type atrial flutter: Bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block AVNRT/Ventricular tachycardia/other atrial arrhythmias: Arrhythmia termination / absence o induction

  2. Acute Safety Endpoint [During Procedure]

    Procedure complications: Any complication during the electrophysiological procedure and 1 week post ablation that could be attributed to the procedure: Vascular complication, pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, heart failure, others. The number of adverse events will be collected.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients referred to our electrophysiology laboratory to treat any type of arrhythmia with catheter ablation
Exclusion Criteria:
  • NA

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón
  • Catheter Robotics, Inc.

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Tomas Datino, Dr., Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01834872
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Arenal - 001
First Posted:
Apr 18, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jun 13, 2013
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2013
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 13, 2013