AFFINITY: A Study of Guselkumab and Golimumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05071664
Collaborator
(none)
90
49
2
15.8
1.8
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab plus golimumab combination treatment in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR) to a prior anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing clinical response compared with guselkumab monotherapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

PsA is a chronic inflammatory multi-faceted disease that impacts the peripheral and axial joints, soft tissues, and skin. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, blocks the binding of extracellular IL-23 to the cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL-23 specific intracellular signaling, subsequent activation, and cytokine production. Golimumab is a fully human anti-TNF-alpha mAb that binds to TNF-alpha with high affinity, prevents binding to its receptors, thereby inhibiting the biological activity of TNF-alpha and resulting in limited production or activity of inflammatory cytokines, thereby providing therapeutic benefit in various chronic inflammatory disorders, including PsA. This study will consist of a Screening Phase (up to 6 weeks), Double-blind Phase from Weeks 0 to 24 which includes the active treatment phase and the primary efficacy visit (Week 24), and Safety Follow-up Phase from Week 24 to Week 36. Key safety assessments will include adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory safety tests (hematology and chemistry), vital signs, monitoring for injection-site and hypersensitivity reactions, and early detection of active tuberculosis (TB). The total duration of the study is up to 42 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
90 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab and Golimumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 25, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 16, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 17, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group 1: Guselkumab and Golimumab

Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) guselkumab and golimumab.

Drug: Guselkumab
Guselkumab will be administered as a SC injection.
Other Names:
  • TREMFYA
  • CNTO1959
  • Drug: Golimumab
    Golimumab will be administered as a SC injection.
    Other Names:
  • SIMPONI
  • CNTO148
  • Active Comparator: Group 2: Guselkumab and Placebo

    Participants will receive SC guselkumab and placebo.

    Drug: Guselkumab
    Guselkumab will be administered as a SC injection.
    Other Names:
  • TREMFYA
  • CNTO1959
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo will be administered as a SC injection.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24 [Week 24]

      MDA defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes the 5 domains of psoriatic arthritis (PsA; joint symptoms, skin psoriasis, participant's assessment of pain and disease activity, physical function, and enthesitis). Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count less than or equal to (<=) 1; swollen joint count <=1; psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) <=1 or body surface area (BSA) <=3 percent (%); participant's pain visual analog scale (VAS) score of <=15; participant's global disease activity VAS (arthritis and psoriasis) score of <=20; disability index of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ-DI) score <=0.5; and tender entheseal points <=1.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 at Week 24 [Week 24]

      ACR 50 response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using VAS (0-100 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 100 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm= very well to 100 mm= very poor]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 100, [0 = no arthritis to 100 = extremely active arthritis]), participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 (indicating no difficulty), to 3 (indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and c-reactive protein (CRP).

    2. Percentage of Participants who Achieve MDA at Week 16 [Week 16]

      MDA defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes the 5 domains of PsA (joint symptoms, skin psoriasis, participant's assessment of pain and disease activity, physical function, and enthesitis). Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count <=1; swollen joint count <=1; PASI <=1 or BSA <=3%; participant's pain VAS score of <=15; participant's global disease activity VAS (arthritis and psoriasis) score of <=20; HAQ-DI score <=0.5; and tender entheseal points <=1.

    3. Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 90 at Week 24 Among the Participants with >=3% BSA Psoriatic involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline [Week 24]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. A PASI 90 response is defined as >=90% improvement in PASI score from baseline.

    4. Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 100 at Week 24 Among the Participants with >=3% BSA Psoriatic involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline [Week 24]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. A PASI 100 response is defined as 100% improvement in PASI score from baseline.

    5. Percentage of Participants with an IGA-psoriasis Response of IGA Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1 AND >=2 Grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 Among Participants with >=3% BSA Psoriatic Involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline [Week 24]

      IGA psoriasis response is defined as an IGA psoriasis score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal) and >=2 grade reduction from baseline. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling, each using a 5-point scale: using 0 (no evidence), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe) scale. The IGA score of psoriasis is based upon the average of induration, erythema, and scaling scores. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    6. Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 [Baseline and Week 24]

      HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement of physical function.

    7. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 24 Among the Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline [Week 24]

      Enthesitis will be assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), a tool developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of pain by applying local pressure to the following entheses: left and right lateral epicondyle humerus, left and right medial femoral condyle, and left and right achilles tendon insertion. The enthesitis index score is a total score of the 6 evaluated sites from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness). A LEI score of 0 at a post baseline visit indicates resolution of enthesitis when baseline LEI >0.

    8. Percentage of Participants with Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 24 Among the Participants with Dactylitis at Baseline [Week 24]

      The presence and severity of dactylitis is assessed in both hands and feet using a scoring system from 0 to 3 (0-no dactylitis, 1-mild dactylitis, 2-moderate dactylitis, and 3-severe dactylitis) for each digit. The results are summed to produce a final score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher score indicates more severe dactylitis. Resolution of dactylitis is defined as a dactylitis score of 0 with the baseline dactylitis score >0.

    9. Change from Baseline in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 24 [Baseline and Week 24]

      SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a PCS with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The PCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.

    10. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Reasonably Related AEs [Up to 42 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with AEs, SAEs, and reasonably related AEs will be assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and suspects transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product. Reasonably related AEs are those AEs which are judged related to study treatment by the investigator.

    11. Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention [Up to 42 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention will be reported.

    12. Percentage of Participants With Infections [Up to 42 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with infections will be reported.

    13. Percentage of Participants With Injection-site Reactions [Up to Week 20]

      Percentage of participants with injection-site reactions will be reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a subcutaneous (SC) study intervention injection-site.

    14. Serum Guselkumab and Golimumab Concentration [Up to Week 36]

      Serum guselkumab and golimumab concentration will be measured.

    15. Percentage of Participants with Antibodies to Guselkumab or Golimumab [Up to Week 36]

      Percentage of participants with antibodies to guselkumab or golimumab will be reported.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 months prior to the first administration of study intervention and meet Classification criteria for PsA (CASPAR) criteria at screening

    • Have active PsA as defined by: at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) >= 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening from the central laboratory

    • Have at least 1 of the following PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis

    • Have active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of >=2 centimeter (cm) diameter or nail changes consistent with psoriasis

    • Have an inadequate response (IR) to 1 anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with only 1 prior anti-TNF-alpha agent and the following: a. Lack of benefit to 1 prior anti-TNF-alpha therapy, as documented in the participant history by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol therapy, or at least 14-weeks of infliximab, or any biosimilar of these 4 therapies. Documented lack of benefit may include inadequate improvement in joint counts, physical function, or disease activity; b. The last dose of anti-TNF-alpha therapy must have occurred greater than 5 half-lives of the drug prior to screening visit (washout period)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab and/or golimumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr AxSpA), systemic lupus erythematosus, or lyme disease

    • Has known intolerance or hypersensitivity to any biologic medication, or known allergies or clinically significant reactions to murine, chimeric, or human proteins, monoclonal antibodies (mAb), or antibody fragments

    • Has received prior treatment with golimumab or guselkumab or has documented intolerance to prior anti-TNF-alpha therapy in the participant history by the treating physician

    • Has received more than 1 prior anti-TNF-alpha agent (or biosimilars)

    • Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research, PLLC Phoenix Arizona United States 85032
    2 Bay Pines VA Healthcare System Bay Pines Florida United States 33744
    3 NYU School of Medicine New York New York United States 10016
    4 University of Rochester Rochester New York United States 14642
    5 STAT Research, Inc. Vandalia Ohio United States 45377
    6 DM Clinical Research Tomball Texas United States 77375
    7 Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze Elblag Poland 82-300
    8 Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J. M. Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna Lodz Poland 90-242
    9 NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C. Nadarzyn Poland 05-830
    10 Centrum Medyczne Poznan Poland 61-113
    11 Medycyna Kliniczna Warsaw Poland 00-874
    12 Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa Targowek Warszawa Poland 03-291
    13 WroMedica I.Bielicka, A.Strzałkowska s.c. Wrocław Poland 51-685
    14 Chelyabinck Regional Clinical Hospital Chelyabinsk Russian Federation 454076
    15 Kemerovo State Medical University Kemerovo Russian Federation 650000
    16 LLL Medical Center Revma-Med Kemerovo Russian Federation 650070
    17 LLC Family Outpatient Clinic # 4 Korolev Russian Federation 141060
    18 Krasnodar Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary Krasnodar Russian Federation 350020
    19 Clinical-Diagnostic Center Euromedservice, JSC Moscow Russian Federation 115419
    20 FGBU Research Institute of Rheumatology named V.A.Nasonova Moscow Russian Federation 115522
    21 GBUZ of Moscow Region &#39;Moscow Region SRI n.a. Vladimirskyi&#39; Moscow Russian Federation 129110
    22 Orenburg State Medical Academy Orenburg Russian Federation 460000
    23 Rostov Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Rostov Russian Federation 344007
    24 Ryazan Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Ryazan Russian Federation 390046
    25 Smolensk regional hospital on Smolensk railway station Smolensk Russian Federation 214025
    26 X7 Clinical Research Company Limited St. Petersburg Russian Federation 194156
    27 Tula Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Tula Russian Federation 300053
    28 Republican Clinical Hospital - G.G. Kuvatov Ufa Russian Federation 450005
    29 Clinical Emergency Hospital n.a. N.V. Solovyev Yaroslavl Russian Federation 150003
    30 Clinical Hospital #3 Yaroslavl Russian Federation 150007
    31 Hosp. Univ. A Coruña A Coruña Spain 15006
    32 Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol Barcelona Spain 08916
    33 Hosp. Univ. de Basurto Bilbao Spain 48013
    34 Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain 28041
    35 Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago Santiago de Compostela Spain 15706
    36 Hosp. Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain 41009
    37 Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme Sevilla Spain 41014
    38 Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe Valencia Spain 46026
    39 State Institution Institute of therapy named after L.T.Malaya AMS Ukraine Kharkiv Ukraine 61039
    40 Municipal Institution Regional hospital-center of emergency care and disasters medicine Kharkiv Ukraine 61204
    41 Medical Research and Practice Center Medbud of the Public Joint Stock Holding Company Kyivmiskbud Kyiv Ukraine 03037
    42 Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital #2 Of Branch 'Health Center' Of The Company 'Ukrainian Railway' Kyiv Ukraine 03049
    43 SI National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko of NAMS of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine 03680
    44 Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise of Kyiv Regional Council 'Kyiv regional Clinical Hospital' Kyiv Ukraine 04107
    45 ME Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.V. Sklifosovsky of Poltava Regional Consuil Poltava Ukraine 36011
    46 Municipal institution of Tepnopil Regional Council 'Ternopil University Hospital' Ternopil Ukraine 46002
    47 MNCE Zakarpatska Regional Clinical Hospital named after A Novak of Zakarpatska Regional Council Uzhgorod Ukraine 88000
    48 Health Clinic Limited Liability Company Vinnytsia Ukraine 21009
    49 Medical Center LLC 'Modern Clinic' Zaporizhzhya Ukraine 69600

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05071664
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CR109054
    • 2021-002012-31
    • CNTO1959PSA2003
    First Posted:
    Oct 8, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 12, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 12, 2022