A Proof-of-concept Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC (Industry)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04991753
Collaborator
(none)
53
28
2
10.1
1.9
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

RA is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that occurs in approximately 1 percent (%) of the population. Nipocalimab (also referred to as JNJ-80202135 and M281) is a fully human aglycosylated immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 monoclonal antibody designed to selectively bind, saturate, and block the IgG binding site on the endogenous neonatal fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptor (FcRn). Nipocalimab has a unique mechanism of action whereby it blocks the IgG binding site on endogenous FcRn and is expected to decrease pathogenic IgG antibody concentrations. A significant involvement of pathogenic IgG antibodies has been demonstrated in autoimmune diseases including RA. The primary hypothesis is that treatment with nipocalimab intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (q2w) is superior to placebo in participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as assessed by the mean change from baseline in the disease activity index score 28 using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12. The study consists of a Screening Period (less than or equal to [<=] 6 Weeks), Double-blind Treatment Period (12 Weeks), and a Safety Follow-up Period (6 Weeks). Key safety assessments will include adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interests (AESIs), clinical laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, and lipid profile), vital signs, and physical examination. The total duration of the study is up to 24 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
53 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Proof-of-concept Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab Administered Intravenously in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Standard Therapy
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 14, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 17, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 17, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group 1: Placebo

Participants will receive placebo intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 10 along with standard-of-care background therapy.

Other: Placebo
Placebo infusion will be administered intravenously.

Experimental: Group 2: Nipocalimab

Participants will receive nipocalimab IV q2w through Week 10 along with standard-of-care background therapy.

Drug: Nipocalimab
Nipocalimab infusions will be administered intravenously.
Other Names:
  • JNJ-80202135
  • M281
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change from Baseline in Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12 [Baseline to Week 12]

      DAS28-CRP is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and CRP. Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP measures the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicates an improvement, and a positive change indicates a worsening.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 12 [Week 12]

      ACR20 response is defined greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain by visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 millimeter [mm], 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI, a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas), range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

    2. Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR50 at Week 12 [Week 12]

      ACR50 response is defined >=50% from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain by VAS (0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas, range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

    3. Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR70 at Week 12 [Week 12]

      ACR70 response is defined >=70% from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain by visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas, range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

    4. Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR90 at Week 12 [Week 12]

      ACR90 response is defined >=90% from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=90% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain by visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas, range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

    5. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Remission at Week 12 [Week 12]

      DAS28-CRP remission is defined as DAS28-CRP value less than (<) 2.6 at the analysis visit.

    6. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 12 [Week 12]

      DAS28 LDA is defined as a DAS28 value of >=2.6 and <=3.2 at the analysis visit.

    7. Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12 [Baseline, up to Week 12]

      The functional status of the participant will be assessed using the HAQ-DI. This 20 question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning.

    8. Percentage of Participants with Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Up to 24 weeks]

      An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.

    9. Percentage of Participants with Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Up to 24 weeks]

      SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product. Treatment-emergent SAEs are defined as SAEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.

    10. Percentage of Participants with TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention [Up to 24 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention will be reported.

    11. Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events of Special interests (AESIs) [Up to 24 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with AESIs will be reported.

    12. Percentage of Participants with Change from Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Over Time [Up to 24 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with change from baseline in clinical laboratory abnormalities over time will be reported.

    13. Percentage of Participants with Change from Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities Over Time [Up to 24 weeks]

      Percentage of participants with change from baseline in vital signs abnormalities (including temperature, pulse/heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure) over time will be reported.

    14. Serum Concentration of Nipocalimab Over Time [Up to Week 18]

      Serum concentration of nipocalimab over time in participants receiving active study intervention will be reported.

    15. Percentage of Participants with Antibodies to Nipocalimab (Anti-drug Antibodies [ADAs] and Neutralizing Antibodies [NAbs]) [Up to Week 18]

      Percentage of participants with antibodies to nipocalimab (ADAs and NAbs) in participants receiving active study intervention will be reported.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and meeting the 2010 American college of rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for RA for at least 3 months before screening

    • Has moderate to severe active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 6 swollen and 6 tender joints out of the 66/68-swollen and tender joint count at the time of screening and at baseline

    • Is positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and/or rheumatoid factor (RF) at screening

    • Screening C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) by the central laboratory

    • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [beta-hCG]) at screening and a negative urine (beta-hCG) pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Has any confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of his/her RA or has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency unless confirmed absent in the participant

    • Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 3 years before screening (with the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma skin cancer that has been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 12 weeks before the first administration of study intervention or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first administration of study intervention)

    • Is (anatomically or functionally) asplenic

    • Has experienced myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening

    • Has other known inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from nipocalimab therapy, including but not limited to ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Lyme disease

    • Is currently taking immunoglobulin (Ig)G fragment crystallizable (Fc)-related protein therapeutics

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates PC Glendale Arizona United States 85306
    2 Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC Mesa Arizona United States 85210
    3 Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC Tucson Arizona United States 85704
    4 Desert Medical Advances Palm Desert California United States 92260
    5 Arthritis Care and Research Center Inc.: Smitha Reddy, MD Poway California United States 92064
    6 TriWest Research Associates, LLC San Diego California United States 92108
    7 Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc. Upland California United States 91786
    8 DJL Clinical Research, PLLC Charlotte North Carolina United States 28210
    9 STAT Research, Inc. Vandalia Ohio United States 45377
    10 Low Country Rheumatology PA Summerville South Carolina United States 29486
    11 West Tennessee Research Institute Jackson Tennessee United States 38305
    12 Accurate Clinical Research, Inc. Houston Texas United States 77089
    13 Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC Mesquite Texas United States 75150
    14 Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II Hamburg Germany 20095
    15 Rheumazentrum Ratingen Ratingen Germany 40878
    16 Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr. Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy Bydgoszcz Poland 85-168
    17 NZOZ Lecznica Mak-Med sc Nadarzyn Poland 05-830
    18 Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska, Prof. UM dr hab. med. Paweł Hrycaj Poznan Poland 61-397
    19 Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa Targowek Warszawa Poland 03-291
    20 Hosp. Univ. A Coruña A Coruña Spain 15006
    21 Hosp. Univ. de Basurto Bilbao Spain 48013
    22 Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago Santiago de Compostela Spain 15706
    23 Hosp. Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain 41009
    24 Hosp. Do Meixoeiro Vigo Spain 36214
    25 Western General Hospital Edinburgh United Kingdom EH4 2XU
    26 Kings College Hospital NHS Trust London United Kingdom SE5 9RS
    27 North Tyneside General Hospital Newcastle United Kingdom NE29 8NH
    28 Haywood Hospital Stoke on Trent United Kingdom ST6 7AG

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04991753
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CR109058
    • 2021-000510-42
    • 80202135ARA2001
    First Posted:
    Aug 5, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 3, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 3, 2022