Postoperative Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty With 2ug/ml Fentanyl Combine With 0.2% Ropivacaine or 0.2% Levobupivcaine

Sponsor
United Christian Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01158586
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
8
7.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Postoperative epidural analgesia (EA) is an effective and well-accepted modality of pain relief technique after having total knee replacement operation(1,4). Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been shown to be safe and effective in standard ward setting(2) and results in reduced epidural analgesic requirements(3). Besides, it also bear the advantage of avoidance of overdose, reduction of waiting times and involvement of patients in their analgesic regimen(3). Both ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are the local anaesthetic using in epidural analgesia which has been proven to be safe and effective(4). 0.2% Ropivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl has been used in our locality for more than 8 years. Another local anaesthetics, levobupivacaine, a S-enantiomer of bupivacaine has come up in Hong Kong, which has been proved to be safe, effective and may be better value for money. These two drugs has been proven to have similar analgesic potency in using as EA for postoperative pain relief for other operation(5,6,7) and for orthropaedics operation but in different concentration(4). Concerns have been raised about the introduction of the levobupivacaine in the departmental protocol. Objectives of this study are A)to determine the equivalence of two local anaesthetics regimen ; 0.2% ropivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl and 0.2% levobupivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl and B) to assess the cost-effectiveness of using these two regimens.

The null hypothesis is that the difference of analgesic effect, presented with visual analogue score, of two patient controlled epidural analgesia regimen, the 0.2% ropivacaine with 2 ug/ml fentanyl and 0.2% levobupivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl is higher than the threshold of 9 mm VAS. (8,9,10)

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2010
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Levobupivacaine

patient control epidural analgeisa using 0.2% levobupivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl

Drug: Levobupivacaine
patient control epidural analgesia using 0.2% levobupivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl

Active Comparator: Ropivacaine

patient controlled epidural analgesia using 0.2% ropivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl

Drug: Levobupivacaine
patient control epidural analgesia using 0.2% levobupivacaine with 2ug/ml fentanyl

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain score [48hours after start epidural analgesia]

    as well as complications from epidural analgesia are also going to record and monitored

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. cost/treatment [48hours]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 18 years old, ASA I -III and

  • Undergoing total knee arthroplasty

  • Combine spinal-epidural anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known hypersensitivity to amide-type local anaesthetics

  • Known hypersensitivity to opioids

  • Known history of severe cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, neurological or psychiatric disease as judged by the investigator

  • Known history of peripheral neuropathies

  • Those receiving chronic analgesic therapy, or any contraindication for epidural analgesia (e.g. clotting disorders, or history of lumbar surgery)

  • Inability to perform a pain score, or pregnancy or lactation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 United Christian Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • United Christian Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01158586
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PCEA-LEVO-ROPI
First Posted:
Jul 8, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Jul 8, 2010
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2010
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 8, 2010