Assessing Clinical Trial Experiences of Patients With Osteosarcoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Clinical study participation has historically been heavily biased toward specific demographics.
Several people will be invited to enroll in this study so that it may collect a variety of data about osteosarcoma clinical trial experiences and identify barriers to participation as well as the causes of participants' failure or withdrawal.
People with osteosarcoma who are invited to take part in medical research will benefit from the analysis of the data.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of patients who decide to enroll in an osteosarcoma clinical trial [3 months]
- Rate of patients who remain in osteosarcoma clinical trial to trial completion [12 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient has been diagnosed with osteosarcoma
-
Patient has self-identified as planning to enroll in an interventional clinical trial
-
Patient is a minimum of 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria:
-
ECOG score of 4
-
Patient is pregnant
-
Inability to perform regular electronic reporting
-
Patient does not understand, sign, and return consent form
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Power Life Sciences Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Michael B Gill, Power Life Sciences Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Bielack S, Carrle D, Jost L; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Osteosarcoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2008 May;19 Suppl 2:ii94-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn102.
- Burns L, Perisoglou M. Clinical trials in osteosarcoma treatment: patients' perspective through art. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;179:345-61. Review.
- Wittig JC, Bickels J, Priebat D, Jelinek J, Kellar-Graney K, Shmookler B, Malawer MM. Osteosarcoma: a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Mar 15;65(6):1123-32. Review.
- 83926159