Assessments on Current Pain Managements in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

Sponsor
National Cheng Kung University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01718821
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
24
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Pain is one of the most common symptoms associated with cancer. The approach to pain management compresses routine pain assessments, utilizes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, and requires ongoing reevaluation of the patient. Cancer pain can be well controlled in the vast majority of patients if the algorithms of pain control are systematically applied, carefully monitored, and tailored to the needs of the individual patient.This study is aimed to assess the current pain managements in upper gastrointestinal cancer patients in Taiwan. The effects of neuropathic pain and depression on the enrolled patients would also be assessed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    50 participants
    Observational Model:
    Ecologic or Community
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Assessments on Current Pain Managements in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients
    Study Start Date :
    Sep 1, 2012
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Sep 1, 2013
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Sep 1, 2014

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Advanced upper GI cancer patients

    Upper GI cancers include: esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, ampulla vater cancer, pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain, assessed by BPI-SF. [Assessed at enrolled date (Day 1)]

      Pain intensities of participants would be assessed by BPI-SF at D1.

    2. Changes in pain, assessed by BPI-SF. [Baseline and 1 month.]

      Changes in pain intensities of participants would be assessed by BPI-SF. The changes in pain would be assessed again after 1 month when participants have outpatient visits or during their admission. An expected following duration average of would be 4 weeks.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Depression, assessed by two stem questions. [Assessed at enrolled date (Day 1)]

      Depression of participants would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned at D1.

    2. Changes in depression, assessed by two stem questions. [Baseline and 1 month.]

      Changes in depression status would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned. The changes would be assessed again after 1 month when participants have outpatient visits or during their admission. An expected following duration average of would be 4 weeks.

    3. Quality of life, assessed by EROTC QLQ C30. [Day 1]

      Quality of life of participants would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned at D1.

    4. Neuropathic pain, assessed by DN4 questions. [Day 1]

      Neuropathic pain of participants would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned at D1.

    5. Changes in quality of life. Quality of life, assessed by EROTC QLQ C30. [Baseline and 1 month.]

      Changes in quality of life would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned. The changes would be assessed again after 1 month when participants have outpatient visits or during their admission. An expected following duration average of would be 4 weeks.

    6. Changes in neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain, assessed by DN4 questions. [Baseline and 1 month.]

      Changes in neuropathic pain would be assessed by questionnaires as mentioned. The changes would be assessed again after 1 month when participants have outpatient visits or during their admission. An expected following duration average of would be 4 weeks.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • with a diagnose of advanced upper GI cancer based on pathology or imaging studies

    • could report pain intensities and answer questionnaires by him/herself

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • with major neurologic or psychiatric diseases

    • could not report pain intensities and answer questionnaires by him/herself

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 National Cheng Kung University Hospital Tainan Taiwan 701

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • National Cheng Kung University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Yea-huei Kao Yang, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, National Cheng Kung University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hsu-chih Chien, Doctoral student, National Cheng Kung University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01718821
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A-ER-101-134
    First Posted:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2014
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 25, 2014