The Association Between Endometriosis, Obesity and nesfatin1
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The association between endometriosis, obesity and nesfatin1.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
All women in this study were subjected to all of the following:
-
Verbal consent was obtained.
-
History taking:
-
Personal history.
-
Menstrual history.
-
Use of contraception.
-
Use of any hormonal treatment in the three months prior to the laparoscopy.
-
History of infertility and its duration and type.
-
Sexual history.
-
Past history.
-
Complete physical examination: general, abdominal and local gynecological examination.
-
Complete preoperative workout for laparoscopy was done.
-
Laparoscopy was done postmenstrual, during follicular phase. All patients gave an informed consent and were fasting for at least 8 hours prior to the laparoscopy, and general anesthesia was used for all patients.
The pelvis and its structures were observed and checked for presence of endometriotic lesions (uterus, tubes, ovaries and ovarian fossae, uterosacral ligaments, Douglas pouch, uterovesical pouch, broad ligaments and lateral pelvic walls).
The Endometriotic patients were then classified into stages I-IV according to the revised American Fertility Society scoring system for endometriosis.
-
Venous samples for measurement of nesfatin-1 were taken by venipuncture from patients during the laparoscopy procedure immediately after initial evaluation and before any intervention.
-
Biopsy from lesions suspected as endometriosis was taken during laparoscopy and sent to histopathology for confirmation.
-
The blood samples were centrifuged immediately after their collection at 5000 rpm for 10 min and serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis.
Patients and Methods
-67-
- Nesfatin-1 was measured by Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay "ELISA" technique using commercially available kits (Boster Biological Technology Human Nesfatin-1 ELISA kits, Catalog number EK1138, USA) in the Central Labs of Ain Shams University Hospitals.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
endometriosis 30 women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. |
|
control 30 women without any laparoscopically detected pelvic endometriotic pathology. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Serum Nesfatin 1 [24 hours]
Venous samples for measurement of nesfatin-1 were taken by venipuncture from patients during the laparoscopy procedure immediately after initial evaluation and before any intervention.The blood samples were centrifuged immediately after their collection at 5000 rpm for 10 min and serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Nesfatin-1 was measured by Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay "ELISA" technique using commercially available kits (Boster Biological Technology Human Nesfatin-1 ELISA kits, Catalog number EK1138, USA) in the Central Labs of Ain Shams University Hospitals.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women in reproductive age group scheduled for laparoscopy for any indication.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Women subject to any hormonal therapy in the last 3 months.
-
Women with chronic endocrine disease like diabetes mellitus.
-
Women diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
-
Severe medical disorder that prohibits the laparoscopic procedure, such as cardiovascular disease and pulmonary disease.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- nesfatin 1
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This study was conducted in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, during the period from December 2014 till October 2015. After approval of the research and ethics committee and, sixty patients were admitted to the wards to undergo laparoscopy for various indications and were included in this study. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Endometriosis | Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 30 women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | 30 women without any laparoscopically detected pelvic endometriotic pathology. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 30 | 30 |
COMPLETED | 30 | 30 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Endometriosis | Control | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 30 women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | 30 women without any laparoscopically detected pelvic endometriotic pathology. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 30 | 30 | 60 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
26.83
(3.89)
|
29.06
(4.25)
|
27.95
(4.20)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
30
100%
|
30
100%
|
60
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
weight (kilograms) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kilograms] |
66.36
(6.04)
|
76.31
(8.35)
|
71.34
(8.80)
|
height (centimeters) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [centimeters] |
161.73
(3.99)
|
161.16
(4.33)
|
161.45
(4.14)
|
body mass index (kilograms per squared meter) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kilograms per squared meter] |
25.4
(1.90)
|
29.4
(2.86)
|
27.4
(3.14)
|
parity (participants) [Number] | |||
para 0 |
20
66.7%
|
13
43.3%
|
33
55%
|
para 1 |
10
33.3%
|
7
23.3%
|
17
28.3%
|
para 2 |
0
0%
|
8
26.7%
|
8
13.3%
|
para 3 |
0
0%
|
2
6.7%
|
2
3.3%
|
number of abortions (participants) [Number] | |||
no abortions |
25
83.3%
|
25
83.3%
|
50
83.3%
|
one abortion |
4
13.3%
|
5
16.7%
|
9
15%
|
two abortions |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
three abortions |
1
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
1.7%
|
previous ectopic pregnancies (participants) [Number] | |||
no ectopic |
29
96.7%
|
28
93.3%
|
57
95%
|
previous ectopic |
1
3.3%
|
2
6.7%
|
3
5%
|
number of living children (participants) [Number] | |||
no children |
23
76.7%
|
13
43.3%
|
36
60%
|
one livebirth |
7
23.3%
|
7
23.3%
|
14
23.3%
|
two livebirths |
0
0%
|
9
30%
|
9
15%
|
three livebirths |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
1
1.7%
|
number of previous cesarean sections (participants) [Number] | |||
none |
22
73.3%
|
14
46.7%
|
36
60%
|
one |
8
26.7%
|
8
26.7%
|
16
26.7%
|
two |
0
0%
|
7
23.3%
|
7
11.7%
|
three |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
1
1.7%
|
previous vaginal deliveries (participants) [Number] | |||
no vaginal deliveries |
28
93.3%
|
26
86.7%
|
54
90%
|
previous vaginal deliveries |
2
6.7%
|
4
13.3%
|
6
10%
|
infertility (participants) [Number] | |||
no infertility |
1
3.3%
|
6
20%
|
7
11.7%
|
primary infertility |
19
63.3%
|
12
40%
|
31
51.7%
|
secondary infertility |
10
33.3%
|
12
40%
|
22
36.7%
|
duration of infertility (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
2
|
3
|
2.5
|
Dysmenorrhea (participants) [Number] | |||
participants having dysmenorrhea |
27
90%
|
11
36.7%
|
38
63.3%
|
participants not having dysmenorrhea |
3
10%
|
19
63.3%
|
22
36.7%
|
chronic pelvic pain (participants) [Number] | |||
participants having chronic pelvic pain |
9
30%
|
4
13.3%
|
13
21.7%
|
participants not having chronic pelvic pain |
21
70%
|
26
86.7%
|
47
78.3%
|
Dyspareunia (participants) [Number] | |||
participants having dyspareunia |
12
40%
|
3
10%
|
15
25%
|
participants not having dyspareunia |
18
60%
|
27
90%
|
45
75%
|
Menorrhagia (participants) [Number] | |||
participants having menorrhagia |
6
20%
|
3
10%
|
9
15%
|
participants not having menorrhagia |
24
80%
|
27
90%
|
51
85%
|
categorization of participants according to body mass index (participants) [Number] | |||
lean |
16
53.3%
|
3
10%
|
19
31.7%
|
overweight |
13
43.3%
|
13
43.3%
|
26
43.3%
|
obese |
1
3.3%
|
14
46.7%
|
15
25%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Serum Nesfatin 1 |
---|---|
Description | Venous samples for measurement of nesfatin-1 were taken by venipuncture from patients during the laparoscopy procedure immediately after initial evaluation and before any intervention.The blood samples were centrifuged immediately after their collection at 5000 rpm for 10 min and serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Nesfatin-1 was measured by Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay "ELISA" technique using commercially available kits (Boster Biological Technology Human Nesfatin-1 ELISA kits, Catalog number EK1138, USA) in the Central Labs of Ain Shams University Hospitals. |
Time Frame | 24 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
In the endometriosis group, two patients were stage I, one was stage II, 12 were stage III and 15 were stage IV according to the revised ASRM scoring system. In the control group, 13 had polycystic varies, 11 had variable pelvic peritoneal adhesions, 4 had tubal block , one had unilateral ovarian cyst and one patient had atrophic ovaries. |
Arm/Group Title | Endometriosis | Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 30 women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | 30 women without any laparoscopically detected pelvic endometriotic pathology. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [picogram/millilitre] |
190
|
510
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Endometriosis, Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | Normality of numerical data distribution was examined by the Shapiro-Wilk. Normally distributed numerical variables were presented as mean±SD and inter-group differences were compared using unpaired t test. Skewed numerical variables were presented as median and interquartile range and between-group differences were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Ordinal data were compared using the chi-squared test for trend. Correlations among numerical variables were tested by Spearman rank correlation. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | All participants were followed up in the hospital for 48 hours and then contacted by phone for another one week till surgical sutures were removed. Then, they were followed by phone for another one month for any adverse events. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Endometriosis | Control | ||
Arm/Group Description | 30 women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | 30 women without any laparoscopically detected pelvic endometriotic pathology. This group will be categorized into 3 sub-groups according to the BMI: i) Lean: BMI <25.0 kg/m2. ii) Overweight: BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 but less than 30 kg/m2. iii) Obese: BMI ≥30 kg/m2. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Endometriosis | Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Endometriosis | Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Endometriosis | Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | amr ahmed mahmoud riad |
---|---|
Organization | Ain Shams Maternity hospital |
Phone | 01005347179 ext +2 |
amr.riad@med.asu.edu.eg |
- nesfatin 1