ADAPT-NC: Comparing Types of Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Intervention
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Asthma is a common disease that affects people of all ages and has significant morbidity and mortality. Poor outcomes and health disparities related to asthma result in part from the difficulty of disseminating new evidence and paradigms of care delivery such as shared decision making (SDM) into clinical practice. This study will evaluate a novel mechanism for dissemination of an evidence-based SDM Toolkit for asthma care in primary care practices. The study is ideally suited to study dissemination methods because it will leverage a partnership between an established consortium of practice based research networks (PBRNs) and an advanced Medicaid Network.
This study will evaluate a novel dissemination process (FLOW) to spread an Asthma Shared Decision Making Toolkit to practices within a Medicaid network using a consortium of practice-based research networks (NCNC). The knowledge gained from this proposal and the partnerships formed between practice-based research networks and NC Medicaid will facilitate widespread dissemination to almost 300 practices.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Changing the behavior of health providers can be challenging, and significant gaps exist in our knowledge of how to best disseminate new medical evidence into everyday practice. This is true when the evidence involves a new paradigm of patient-centered care delivery such as shared decision making (SDM). The most common dissemination used is passive diffusion, which includes journal publications, didactic presentations, and educational material and often fails to produce timely or sustainable practice level changes. A unique partnership between a Medicaid network and a well established consortium of practice-based research networks provides an ideal venue to examine the effectiveness of new effective methods of dissemination. We previously developed an asthma toolkit that was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and tested across a regional network of Pediatric, Family Medicine, and Internal Medicine ambulatory practices in Mecklenburg County North Carolina. During this study, key principles of community based participatory research were used engaging providers and patients to develop a Facilitator-Led participant OWned (FLOW) Approach to dissemination. The FLOW approach uses Practice Facilitators to guide practices through the process of adapting the Toolkit into the existing culture and workflow. This approach led to rapid dissemination and sustainability of the Toolkit across six practices. The initial results have showed marked improvement in patient outcomes (improved medication adherence and decreased asthma exacerbations) with increased patient involvement in the creation of the care plans. The objective is to determine what dissemination strategy most effectively increases practice level adoption of shared decision making, improves patient outcomes, and increases patient involvement in care decisions. We will leverage a partnership between the statewide Medicaid network and NCNC, a state-wide consortium of research networks, to identify best practices for dissemination of the shared decision making toolkit. We will test the FLOW method for dissemination on a larger scale by randomizing 30 primary care practices from 4 practice based research networks to one of three dissemination arms: (1) Facilitator-Led participant OWned (FLOW) Approach to Dissemination; (2) Traditional dissemination (Active Diffusion) with facilitator exposure; and (3) Passive dissemination.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Facilitator-Led This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. |
Other: Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit
A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. The research team for this proposal was funded by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to build, disseminate and evaluate a novel Asthma SDM Toolkit - The Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study. The Toolkit development was completed in 2010 and has been in evaluation for 2 years. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination.
|
| Active Comparator: Traditional The most commonly used dissemination technique is active diffusion, which includes didactic presentations, academic detailing, exposure to journal publications and subject matter experts, and educational material distribution. We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. |
Other: Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit
A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. The research team for this proposal was funded by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to build, disseminate and evaluate a novel Asthma SDM Toolkit - The Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study. The Toolkit development was completed in 2010 and has been in evaluation for 2 years. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination.
|
| No Intervention: Control A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Patient Perception of Shared Decision Making [18 months]
Success of the dissemination process will be determined by looking at process and outcome measures collected at the patient and clinic level. The primary outcome will be the patient's perceptions of shared decision making using a patient survey.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Health Outcomes [18 months]
Health outcomes data collected from Continuing Care of North Carolina that indicate poor asthma control and/or marker for exacerbations. These include patients with: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, Oral Steroid prescriptions, or patients with one or more of the markers for exacerbation: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, Oral Steroid prescriptions.
- Medication Adherence [18 months]
Additional measures that will be evaluated to determine the success of dissemination will be based on indicators of poor asthma control including: medication adherence (controller medication refills). Data was not collected.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: North Carolina practices will be eligible for participation in the study if they have over 75 active Medicaid patients in their panel with the diagnosis of asthma.
-
Exclusion Criteria: Prior participation in the Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study.
-
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Family Medicine | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28207 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hazel Tapp, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CD-12-11-4276
Study Results
Participant Flow
| Recruitment Details | All practices were recruited and randomized by May 2014. |
|---|---|
| Pre-assignment Detail | All practices were randomized in the study. Since the intervention was practice wide, individual patients were not required to be enrolled or consented. |
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the SDM Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), identified by both the Institute of Medicine and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute as an important new means of improving patient outcomes. In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination. | The most commonly used dissemination technique is active diffusion, which includes didactic presentations, academic detailing, exposure to journal publications and subject matter experts, and educational material distribution. We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma SDM Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. | A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. |
| Period Title: Overall Study | |||
| STARTED | 1503 | 2523 | 2248 |
| Practice Rollout | 1503 | 2523 | 0 |
| Practice Refresher | 1503 | 2523 | 0 |
| Surveys Collected | 1503 | 2523 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 1503 | 2523 | 2248 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the SDM Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), identified by both the Institute of Medicine and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute as an important new means of improving patient outcomes. In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination. | The most commonly used dissemination technique is active diffusion, which includes didactic presentations, academic detailing, exposure to journal publications and subject matter experts, and educational material distribution. We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma SDM Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. | A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. | Total of all reporting groups |
| Overall Participants | 1503 | 2523 | 2248 | 6274 |
| Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||
| Under the Age of 21 |
1340
89.2%
|
2223
88.1%
|
2058
91.5%
|
5621
89.6%
|
| Age 21 and Older |
163
10.8%
|
300
11.9%
|
190
8.5%
|
653
10.4%
|
| Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
| Female |
670
44.6%
|
1121
44.4%
|
950
42.3%
|
2741
43.7%
|
| Male |
833
55.4%
|
1402
55.6%
|
1298
57.7%
|
3533
56.3%
|
Outcome Measures
| Title | Patient Perception of Shared Decision Making |
|---|---|
| Description | Success of the dissemination process will be determined by looking at process and outcome measures collected at the patient and clinic level. The primary outcome will be the patient's perceptions of shared decision making using a patient survey. |
| Time Frame | 18 months |
Outcome Measure Data
| Analysis Population Description |
|---|
| Number of surveys collected. Per the protocol, surveys were not collected for the Usual Care cohort. |
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led | Traditional |
|---|---|---|
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. The research team for this proposal was funded by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to build, disseminate and evaluate a novel Asthma SDM Toolkit - The Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study. The Toolkit development was completed in 2010 and has been in evaluation for | For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical te |
| Measure Participants | 705 | 523 |
| The provider alone made the decision |
34
2.3%
|
40
1.6%
|
| The provider mostly made the decision, and I playe |
86
5.7%
|
79
3.1%
|
| The provider and I participated equally in making |
528
35.1%
|
347
13.8%
|
| I mostly made the decision, and the provider play |
30
2%
|
26
1%
|
| I alone made the decision |
27
1.8%
|
31
1.2%
|
| Title | Health Outcomes |
|---|---|
| Description | Health outcomes data collected from Continuing Care of North Carolina that indicate poor asthma control and/or marker for exacerbations. These include patients with: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, Oral Steroid prescriptions, or patients with one or more of the markers for exacerbation: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, Oral Steroid prescriptions. |
| Time Frame | 18 months |
Outcome Measure Data
| Analysis Population Description |
|---|
| Medicaid Patients diagnosed with Asthma |
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the SDM Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), identified by both the Institute of Medicine and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute as an important new means of improving patient outcomes. In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination. | The most commonly used dissemination technique is active diffusion, which includes didactic presentations, academic detailing, exposure to journal publications and subject matter experts, and educational material distribution. We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma SDM Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. | A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. |
| Measure Participants | 1503 | 2523 | 2248 |
| Patients with Emergency Department Visits |
144
9.6%
|
355
14.1%
|
288
12.8%
|
| Patients with Hospitalizations |
23
1.5%
|
29
1.1%
|
38
1.7%
|
| Patients with Oral Steroid Prescriptions |
550
36.6%
|
977
38.7%
|
764
34%
|
| Patients with Exacerbations |
599
39.9%
|
1031
40.9%
|
810
36%
|
| Title | Medication Adherence |
|---|---|
| Description | Additional measures that will be evaluated to determine the success of dissemination will be based on indicators of poor asthma control including: medication adherence (controller medication refills). Data was not collected. |
| Time Frame | 18 months |
Outcome Measure Data
| Analysis Population Description |
|---|
| Data was not collected |
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led | Traditional | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. The research team for this proposal was funded by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to build, disseminate and evaluate a novel Asthma SDM Toolkit - The Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study. The Toolkit development was completed in 2010 and has been in evaluation for | We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical te | A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. |
| Measure Participants | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Events
| Time Frame | Adverse Event Data was not collected as part of this trial. Intervention was applied to the whole clinic and individual patients were not tracked by the research team. Survey data was anonymous and occurred right after clinic visit. Outcomes data collected for this project came through summarized data provided by the state Medicaid network where adverse events are not collected. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event Reporting Description | Adverse Event Data was not collected as part of this trial. Intervention was applied to the whole clinic and individual patients were not tracked by the research team. Survey data was anonymous and occurred right after clinic visit. Outcomes data collected for this project came through summarized data provided by the state Medicaid network where adverse events are not collected. | |||||
| Arm/Group Title | Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control | |||
| Arm/Group Description | This approach to dissemination allows clinics some freedom to tailor the SDM Toolkit and training process for their specific environment and patient population while maintaining fidelity of certain key elements that are felt to be essential for success. The expertise of the trained Practice Facilitator will help guide the process of implementation at the practice level. Asthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit: A potential solution to improving asthma outcomes is the use of patient-centered approaches like Shared Decision Making (SDM), identified by both the Institute of Medicine and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute as an important new means of improving patient outcomes. In the SDM process, patients and their health care providers are engaged jointly in making decisions about medical tests and treatments. This study will continue to evaluate the Toolkit in a wide array of practices across NC while testing a new method of dissemination. | The most commonly used dissemination technique is active diffusion, which includes didactic presentations, academic detailing, exposure to journal publications and subject matter experts, and educational material distribution. We have defined this type of dissemination, "traditional dissemination". For the purpose of this study, practices randomized to traditional dissemination will receive a lunchtime presentation by a physician champion / subject matter expert on shared decision making. The presentation will give an overview of the Asthma SDM Toolkit, access to the internet link with additional information, and a copy of all printed materials associated with the Toolkit. | A third group will be randomized into an arm with no formal dissemination. This arm will receive information only through passive exposure to the concepts of shared decision making. This would include introduction to the SDM concepts through the media, conferences, or social networks. Having this control in place will allow the research team to isolate the effect of both the FLOW approach and the traditional approach to dissemination. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
| Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control | ||||
| Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
| Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
| Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control | ||||
| Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
| Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
| Facilitator-Led Participant Owned (FLOW) Dissemination | Traditional Dissemination (Active Diffusion) | Control | ||||
| Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
| Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | |||
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
| Name/Title | Dr. Thomas Ludden |
|---|---|
| Organization | Carolinas HealthCare System |
| Phone | 704-608-2390 |
| tom.ludden@carolinashealthcare.org |
- CD-12-11-4276