A Study to Evaluate the Dosing of AMG 827 for Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Asthma

Sponsor
Amgen (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01199289
Collaborator
(none)
315
49
4
14.6
6.4
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if AMG 827 is effective compared to placebo as measured by change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) composite scores.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: AMG 827
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
315 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AMG 827 in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Asthma
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 4, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 21, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 21, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Participants will receive the matching placebo administered as subcutaneous (SC) injections at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

Drug: Placebo
SC injection.

Experimental: AMG 827 140 mg

Participants will receive AMG 140 mg administered as SC injections at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

Drug: AMG 827
SC injection.

Experimental: AMG 827 210 mg

Participants will receive AMG 210 mg administered as SC injections at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

Drug: AMG 827
SC injection.

Experimental: AMG 827 280 mg

Participants will receive AMG 280 mg administered as SC injections at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

Drug: AMG 827
SC injection.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Scores to Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

    The ACQ is an instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. It is a validated composite score that assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon awakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/limitation) scale. The total score is obtained by adding the value from each question and dividing by the number of questions. Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) [Baseline and Week 12]

    FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. FEV1 was performed both pre and post-administration of bronchodilator treatment at Baseline and Week 12.

  2. Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) to Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

  3. Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Rescue Short Acting β-Agonist (SABA) Use to Week 12 [Baseline to Week 12]

    Participants recorded SABA use for 1 week prior to randomization (baseline) and the average number of days recorded was subtracted from average days of SABA use across 12 week intervention period.

  4. Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score to Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

    Participants recorded their daily asthma symptoms in their electronic diaries (Ediary). It included 7 questions: frequency of night time awakening, time awake at night, wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness and activity limitation. Daily asthma symptoms score is the sum of 7 individual scores (with the total score ranging from 0-21). Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  5. Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score at Week 12 [Baseline and Week 12]

    The AQLQ is the most commonly used asthma specific instrument and includes evaluations of both symptom and quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms (Mitchell EA et al, 1997, Juniper et al, 1994, Christie MJ et al, 1993, Juniper et al, 1993). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score = mean of the responses to the 32 questions. Higher scores indicate "better quality of life" and a positive change from baseline indicates improved symptoms.

  6. Proportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days [Up to Week 12]

    Asthma symptom-free days were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score. Asthma symptom-free days without SABA use were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score and no SABA use. The proportion of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as the number of asthma symptom-free days over the number of days in the double-blind treatment period (12 weeks).

  7. Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10 [Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10]

  8. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10 [Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10]

  9. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10 [Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Men or women 18 to 65 years of age

  • Percent of predicted FEV1 ≥ 50% and ≤ 80%

  • At least 12% reversibility over pre-bronchodilator FEV1

  • Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) ≥ 200 and ≤ 1000 µg/day fluticasone powder or equivalent

  • Ongoing asthma symptoms with ACQ composite score ≥ 1.5 points

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Respiratory infection within 4 weeks of screening visit or 1 week of baseline visit

  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic pulmonary condition other than asthma

  • Any uncontrolled or clinically significant systemic disease (eg, uncontrolled diabetes, liver disease)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Research Site Encinitas California United States
2 Research Site Huntington Beach California United States
3 Research Site Los Angeles California United States
4 Research Site San Diego California United States
5 Research Site Stockton California United States
6 Research Site Colorado Springs Colorado United States
7 Research Site Stockbridge Georgia United States
8 Research Site Baltimore Maryland United States
9 Research Site North Dartmouth Massachusetts United States
10 Research Site Saint Louis Missouri United States
11 Research Site Bozeman Montana United States
12 Research Site Bellevue Nebraska United States
13 Research Site Skillman New Jersey United States
14 Research Site Rockville Centre New York United States
15 Research Site High Point North Carolina United States
16 Research Site Cincinnati Ohio United States
17 Research Site Lake Oswego Oregon United States
18 Research Site Medford Oregon United States
19 Research Site Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States
20 Research Site Dallas Texas United States
21 Research Site El Paso Texas United States
22 Research Site Madison Wisconsin United States
23 Research Site Feldbach Austria
24 Research Site Hallein Austria
25 Research Site Wien Austria
26 Research Site Bruxelles Belgium
27 Research Site Leuven Belgium
28 Research Site Liege Belgium
29 Research Site Calgary Alberta Canada
30 Research Site Ottawa Ontario Canada
31 Research Site Toronto Ontario Canada
32 Research Site Helsinki Finland
33 Research Site Jyväskylä Finland
34 Research Site Turku Finland
35 Research Site Edeleny Hungary
36 Research Site Matrahaza Hungary
37 Research Site Tatabanya Hungary
38 Research Site Torokbalint Hungary
39 Research Site Zalaegerszeg - Pozva Hungary
40 Research Site Bucheon-si Korea, Republic of
41 Research Site Seoul Korea, Republic of
42 Research Site Suwon Korea, Republic of
43 Research Site Rotterdam Netherlands
44 Research Site Bialystok Poland
45 Research Site Chodziez Poland
46 Research Site Gdansk Poland
47 Research Site Wroclaw Poland
48 Research Site Moscow Russian Federation
49 Research Site Saint Petersburg Russian Federation

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Amgen

Investigators

  • Study Director: MD, Amgen

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01199289
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 20090203
First Posted:
Sep 10, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 26, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Keywords provided by Amgen
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details This study was conducted at 61 centers in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Korea, and the United States; 47 of these sites enrolled participants from 04 October 2010 to 21 December 2011. 315 participants were enrolled, but 10 participants from 1 site were excluded from all analyses due to major issues of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) compliance and are not included in the participant flow.
Pre-assignment Detail A washout period for specific asthma medications was conducted after informed consent and prior to run-in period. After completing screening and meeting all eligibility criteria, all eligible participants underwent run-in visits for 4 weeks prior to randomization.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 77 75 76 77
Participants Who Received Study Treatment 76 74 76 76
COMPLETED 68 68 71 65
NOT COMPLETED 9 7 5 12

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 76 74 76 76 302
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
46.8
(11.2)
43.6
(11.6)
46.0
(11.2)
46.5
(11.5)
45.7
(11.5)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
53
69.7%
42
56.8%
38
50%
46
60.5%
179
59.3%
Male
23
30.3%
32
43.2%
38
50%
30
39.5%
123
40.7%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
3
3.9%
8
10.8%
6
7.9%
3
3.9%
20
6.6%
Not Hispanic or Latino
73
96.1%
66
89.2%
70
92.1%
73
96.1%
282
93.4%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
White
69
90.8%
55
74.3%
63
82.9%
67
88.2%
254
84.1%
Black or African American
5
6.6%
16
21.6%
6
7.9%
4
5.3%
31
10.3%
Asian
2
2.6%
3
4.1%
2
2.6%
3
3.9%
10
3.3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
2
2.6%
0
0%
2
0.7%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Multiple
0
0%
0
0%
2
2.6%
2
2.6%
4
1.3%
Other
0
0%
0
0%
1
1.3%
0
0%
1
0.3%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Scores to Week 12
Description The ACQ is an instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. It is a validated composite score that assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon awakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/limitation) scale. The total score is obtained by adding the value from each question and dividing by the number of questions. Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 73 75 74
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Score on a scale]
-0.427
(0.784)
-0.521
(0.796)
-0.512
(0.728)
-0.556
(0.810)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5838
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.068
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.311 to 0.175
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5391
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.075
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.316 to 0.166
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3583
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.113
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.355 to 0.129
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Description FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. FEV1 was performed both pre and post-administration of bronchodilator treatment at Baseline and Week 12.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 73 75 74
Pre-Bronchodilator
0.075
(0.323)
0.035
(0.307)
0.066
(0.367)
0.058
(0.348)
Post-Bronchodilator
-0.052
(0.275)
-0.019
(0.259)
0.016
(0.227)
-0.032
(0.285)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments Pre-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4076
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.047
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.157 to 0.064
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments Pre-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6915
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.022
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.130 to 0.086
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments Pre-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7271
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.019
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.126 to 0.088
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments Post-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9210
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.005
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.086 to 0.095
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments Post-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1139
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.070
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.017 to 0.157
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments Post-Bronchodilator
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6426
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.021
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.066 to 0.107
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) to Week 12
Description
Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 74 76 75
AM
4.26
(39.220)
-14.09
(46.708)
-4.53
(46.468)
-1.95
(44.624)
PM
-0.22
(37.807)
-11.56
(40.277)
-9.16
(45.080)
-7.96
(37.984)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments AM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0262
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -16.847
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-31.686 to -2.009
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments AM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3627
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.723
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-21.239 to 7.793
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments AM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4507
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -5.488
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-19.791 to 8.814
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments PM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1228
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -10.426
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-23.686 to 2.834
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments PM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3092
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.738
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-19.758 to 6.281
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments PM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2167
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -8.043
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-20.831 to 4.744
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Rescue Short Acting β-Agonist (SABA) Use to Week 12
Description Participants recorded SABA use for 1 week prior to randomization (baseline) and the average number of days recorded was subtracted from average days of SABA use across 12 week intervention period.
Time Frame Baseline to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 74 76 75
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Days]
-0.630
(2.842)
-0.187
(2.971)
-0.727
(2.941)
-0.798
(4.293)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5157
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.331
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.670 to 1.332
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6434
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.234
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.229 to 0.760
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6954
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.199
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.196 to 0.799
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score to Week 12
Description Participants recorded their daily asthma symptoms in their electronic diaries (Ediary). It included 7 questions: frequency of night time awakening, time awake at night, wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness and activity limitation. Daily asthma symptoms score is the sum of 7 individual scores (with the total score ranging from 0-21). Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 74 76 75
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Score on a scale]
-1.531
(3.674)
-1.816
(3.250)
-1.629
(2.620)
-1.607
(3.238)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5577
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.283
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.231 to 0.665
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9366
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.038
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.904 to 0.980
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7745
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.138
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.808 to 1.084
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score at Week 12
Description The AQLQ is the most commonly used asthma specific instrument and includes evaluations of both symptom and quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms (Mitchell EA et al, 1997, Juniper et al, 1994, Christie MJ et al, 1993, Juniper et al, 1993). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score = mean of the responses to the 32 questions. Higher scores indicate "better quality of life" and a positive change from baseline indicates improved symptoms.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations, and had non-missing baseline and post-baseline data.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 66 65 69 63
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Score on a scale]
0.626
(0.901)
0.596
(0.979)
0.537
(0.710)
0.587
(0.866)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8524
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.026
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.251 to 0.303
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8139
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.033
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.305 to 0.240
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9881
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.002
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.281 to 0.276
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Proportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days
Description Asthma symptom-free days were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score. Asthma symptom-free days without SABA use were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score and no SABA use. The proportion of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as the number of asthma symptom-free days over the number of days in the double-blind treatment period (12 weeks).
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment who were not excluded due to GCP violations
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 76 74 76 76
With use of SABA
0.230
(0.299)
0.167
(0.263)
0.198
(0.293)
0.166
(0.267)
Without use of SABA
0.201
(0.294)
0.123
(0.241)
0.181
(0.286)
0.146
(0.256)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments With use of SABA
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1213
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.062
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.141 to 0.017
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments With use of SABA
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6643
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.017
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.095 to 0.061
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2879
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments With use of SABA
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.042
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.121 to 0.036
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 140 mg
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Without use of SABA
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0546
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.074
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.150 to 0.001
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 210 mg
Comments Without use of SABA
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9078
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.004
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.080 to 0.071
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, AMG 827 280 mg
Comments Without use of SABA
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3616
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.035
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.111 to 0.040
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10
Description
Time Frame Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses set: all participants who received at least one dose of AMG 827 and who had at least 1 PK concentration measurement.
Arm/Group Title AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 33 35 29
Median (Full Range) [Days]
3.1
3.1
3.9
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10
Description
Time Frame Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses set: all participants who received at least one dose of AMG 827 and who had at least 1 PK concentration measurement.
Arm/Group Title AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 33 35 29
Mean (Standard Deviation) [µg/mL]
8.11
(6.91)
16.6
(12.4)
29.4
(17.5)
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10
Description
Time Frame Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses set: all participants who received at least one dose of AMG 827 and who had at least 1 PK concentration measurement.
Arm/Group Title AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Measure Participants 33 35 29
Mean (Standard Deviation) [µg*day/mL]
68.3
(74.3)
171
(150)
313
(196)

Adverse Events

Time Frame Day 1 to Week 16
Adverse Event Reporting Description All-cause mortality is reported for all participants randomized in the study that were not excluded from analysis due to GCP violations. Serious adverse events and other adverse events are reported for all participants who received at least one dose of study drug that were not excluded from analysis due to GCP violations.
Arm/Group Title Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received the matching placebo administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 140 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 872 210 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Participants received AMG 827 280 mg administered as a SC injection at Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
All Cause Mortality
Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/77 (0%) 0/75 (0%) 0/76 (0%) 0/77 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/76 (1.3%) 3/74 (4.1%) 1/76 (1.3%) 2/76 (2.6%)
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster 0/76 (0%) 1/74 (1.4%) 0/76 (0%) 0/76 (0%)
Meningitis viral 0/76 (0%) 1/74 (1.4%) 0/76 (0%) 0/76 (0%)
Otitis externa 0/76 (0%) 0/74 (0%) 0/76 (0%) 1/76 (1.3%)
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased 0/76 (0%) 1/74 (1.4%) 0/76 (0%) 0/76 (0%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia unawareness 0/76 (0%) 0/74 (0%) 0/76 (0%) 1/76 (1.3%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Degeneration of uterine leiomyoma 0/76 (0%) 1/74 (1.4%) 0/76 (0%) 0/76 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica 1/76 (1.3%) 0/74 (0%) 0/76 (0%) 0/76 (0%)
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis 0/76 (0%) 0/74 (0%) 1/76 (1.3%) 0/76 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Placebo AMG 827 140 mg AMG 827 210 mg AMG 827 280 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 24/76 (31.6%) 28/74 (37.8%) 28/76 (36.8%) 28/76 (36.8%)
General disorders
Injection site erythema 2/76 (2.6%) 5/74 (6.8%) 7/76 (9.2%) 7/76 (9.2%)
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis 5/76 (6.6%) 5/74 (6.8%) 3/76 (3.9%) 3/76 (3.9%)
Oral candidiasis 0/76 (0%) 1/74 (1.4%) 4/76 (5.3%) 3/76 (3.9%)
Sinusitis 4/76 (5.3%) 2/74 (2.7%) 4/76 (5.3%) 0/76 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 6/76 (7.9%) 8/74 (10.8%) 4/76 (5.3%) 8/76 (10.5%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma 11/76 (14.5%) 18/74 (24.3%) 15/76 (19.7%) 14/76 (18.4%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema 1/76 (1.3%) 2/74 (2.7%) 1/76 (1.3%) 4/76 (5.3%)

Limitations/Caveats

10 participants from 1 site were excluded from all analysis due to major GCP violations.

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Study Director
Organization Amgen Inc.
Phone 866-572-6436
Email medinfo@amgen.com
Responsible Party:
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01199289
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 20090203
First Posted:
Sep 10, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 26, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021