Efficacy and Safety Study of FP MDPI Compared With FS MDPI in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (Fp) multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (FS) MDPI when administered over 12 weeks in patients 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Study drug and placebo were supplied in Teva multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) devices and provided for participants to use at home. Participants performed spirometry at every visit. Each participant was given a diary at each visit for use until the next visit. Rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol) was dispensed at each visit, if needed, as determined by the investigational center personnel.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg Participants took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. |
Drug: FS MDPI
FS MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened.
During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 200/12.5 mcg or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 100/12.5 mcg twice a day for a total daily dose of 200/25 mcg or 400/25 mcg.
Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.
Other Names:
Drug: Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI
Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Participants took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. |
Drug: FS MDPI
FS MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened.
During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 200/12.5 mcg or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 100/12.5 mcg twice a day for a total daily dose of 200/25 mcg or 400/25 mcg.
Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.
Other Names:
Drug: Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI
Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Fp MDPI 200 mcg Participants took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Fp MDPI
Fp MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate (Fp) dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened.
During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either 200 mcg or 100 mcg of Fp one inhalation twice a day for a total daily dose of 400 mcg or 200 mcg.
Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.
Other Names:
Drug: Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI
Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Fp MDPI 100 mcg Participants took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Fp MDPI
Fp MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate (Fp) dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened.
During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either 200 mcg or 100 mcg of Fp one inhalation twice a day for a total daily dose of 400 mcg or 200 mcg.
Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.
Other Names:
Drug: Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI
Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo MDPI Participants took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Placebo MDPI
The placebo multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) was identical to the devices used to deliver active drug, and indistinguishable from the active treatments. Patients took one inhalation twice a day (approximately 12 hours apart). Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.
Other Names:
Drug: Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI
Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12 [Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours]
A subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value.
- Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12 [Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12]
Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment [Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12]
Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week.
- Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period [Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12]
The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary. Daytime Symptom Score: 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms for 1 short period 2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods 3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities 4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM): 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early) 2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early) 3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period [Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12]
Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures.
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12 [up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period]
The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment.
- Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old [Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)]
The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life.
- Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1 [Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)]
The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. Values of NA indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%.
- Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period [Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period]
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 40 to 85% of their predicted normal value.
-
Current Asthma Therapy: Patients must have a short-acting β2-agonist (for rescue use) for a minimum of 8 weeks before the Screening Visit (SV) and a qualifying dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The ICS may be either as ICS monotherapy or as an ICS/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combination. The ICS component of the patient's asthma therapy should be stable for a minimum of 1 month before providing consent.
-
Reversibility of Disease: Patients must have at least 15% reversibility (all patients) and at least a 200 mL increase from baseline FEV1 (patients age 18 and older) within 30 minutes after 2 to 4 inhalations of albuterol/salbutamol at the SV. Note: Patients who do not qualify for the study due to failure to meet reversibility will be permitted to perform a retest once within 7 days.
-
Patients must provide written informed consent/assent.. For minor patients (ages 12 to 17 years, or as applicable per local regulations), the written ICF must be signed and dated by the parent/legal guardian and the written assent form must be signed and dated by the patient (if applicable). Note: Age requirements are as specified by local regulations.
-
Outpatient >= 12 years of age on the date of consent/assent. In countries where the local regulations permit enrollment of adult patients only, patients must be 18 years of age and older.
-
Asthma diagnosis: The patient has a diagnosis of asthma as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH). The asthma diagnosis has been present for a minimum of 3 months and has been stable (defined as no exacerbations and no changes in asthma medication) for at least 30 days.
-
The patient is able to perform acceptable and repeatable spirometry.
-
The patient is able to perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) with a handheld peak flow meter.
-
The patient is able to use a metered dose inhaler (MDI) device without a spacer device and a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) device.
-
The patient is able to withhold (as judged by the investigator) his or her regimen of ICS or study drug, and rescue medication for at least 6 hours before the screening visit (SV) and before all treatment visits.
-
The patient/parent/legal guardian/caregiver is capable of understanding the requirements, risks, and benefits of study participation, and, as judged by the investigator, capable of giving informed consent/assent and being compliant with all study requirements.
-
SABAs: All patients must be able to replace their current SABA with albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI inhalation aerosol for the duration of the study.
-
Female patients may not be pregnant, breastfeeding, or attempting to become pregnant.
- other criteria may apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Exclusion Criteria:
-
A history of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation (an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnia, respiratory arrest, or hypoxic seizures).
-
The patient is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant during the study period or for 30 days after the study.
-
The patient has participated as a randomized patient in any investigational drug study within 30 days of the SV.
-
The patient has previously participated as a randomized patient in a study of Fp MDPI or FS MDPI.
-
The patient has a known hypersensitivity to any corticosteroid, salmeterol, or any of the excipients in the study drug or rescue medication formulation (ie, lactose).
-
The patient has been treated with any known strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors (eg, azole antifungals, ritonavir, or clarithromycin) within 30 days before the SV.
-
The patient has been treated with any of the prohibited medications during the prescribed (per protocol) washout periods before the SV.
-
The patient currently smokes or has a smoking history of 10 pack years or more (a pack year is defined as smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/day for 1 year). The patient must not have used tobacco products within the past year (eg, cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, or pipe tobacco).
-
The patient has a culture-documented or suspected bacterial or viral infection of the upper or lower respiratory tract, sinus, or middle ear that has not resolved at least 2 weeks before the SV.
-
The patient has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years preceding the SV.
-
The patient has had an asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids within 30 days before the SV, or has had any hospitalization for asthma within 2 months before the SV.
-
Initiation or dose escalation of immunotherapy (administered by any route) is planned during the study period. However, patients on stable immunotherapy may be considered for inclusion.
-
The patient has used immunosuppressive medications within 4 weeks before the SV.
-
The patient is unable to tolerate or unwilling to comply with the appropriate washout periods and withholding of all applicable medications.
-
The patient has untreated oral candidiasis at the SV. Patients with clinical visual evidence of oral candidiasis who agree to receive treatment and comply with appropriate medical monitoring may enter the study.
-
The patient has a history of a positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C infection.
-
The patient is either an employee or an immediate relative of an employee of the clinical investigational center.
-
A member of the patient's household is participating in the study at the same time. However, after the enrolled patient completes or discontinues participation in the study, another patient from the same household may be screened.
-
The patient has a disease/condition that in the medical judgment of the investigator would put the safety of the patient at risk through participation or that could affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition worsened during the study.
- other criteria may apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Teva Investigational Site 12429 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | |
2 | Teva Investigational Site 12599 | Little Rock | Alaska | United States | |
3 | Teva Investigational Site 12609 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | |
4 | Teva Investigational Site 12445 | Costa Mesa | California | United States | |
5 | Teva Investigational Site 12454 | Encinitas | California | United States | |
6 | Teva Investigational Site 12456 | Fresno | California | United States | |
7 | Teva Investigational Site 12461 | Fullerton | California | United States | |
8 | Teva Investigational Site 12410 | Huntington Beach | California | United States | |
9 | Teva Investigational Site 12452 | Huntington Beach | California | United States | |
10 | Teva Investigational Site 12417 | Long Beach | California | United States | |
11 | Teva Investigational Site 13017 | Mission Viejo | California | United States | |
12 | Teva Investigational Site 12462 | Rancho Mirage | California | United States | |
13 | Teva Investigational Site 12411 | Rolling Hills Estates | California | United States | |
14 | Teva Investigational Site 13018 | San Diego | California | United States | |
15 | Teva Investigational Site 12413 | San Jose | California | United States | |
16 | Teva Investigational Site 12403 | Stockton | California | United States | |
17 | Teva Investigational Site 12444 | Upland | California | United States | |
18 | Teva Investigational Site 12999 | Vista | California | United States | |
19 | Teva Investigational Site 12405 | Centennial | Colorado | United States | |
20 | Teva Investigational Site 12419 | Centennial | Colorado | United States | |
21 | Teva Investigational Site 13000 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | |
22 | Teva Investigational Site 12459 | Waterbury | Connecticut | United States | |
23 | Teva Investigational Site 13004 | Largo | Florida | United States | |
24 | Teva Investigational Site 12414 | Miami | Florida | United States | |
25 | Teva Investigational Site 12437 | Miami | Florida | United States | |
26 | Teva Investigational Site 12427 | Orlando | Florida | United States | |
27 | Teva Investigational Site 12423 | Ormond Beach | Florida | United States | |
28 | Teva Investigational Site 12604 | Panama City | Florida | United States | |
29 | Teva Investigational Site 13316 | Tamarac | Florida | United States | |
30 | Teva Investigational Site 12606 | Winter Park | Florida | United States | |
31 | Teva Investigational Site 12435 | Savannah | Georgia | United States | |
32 | Teva Investigational Site 13315 | Eagle | Idaho | United States | |
33 | Teva Investigational Site 12439 | River Forest | Illinois | United States | |
34 | Teva Investigational Site 12449 | Shiloh | Illinois | United States | |
35 | Teva Investigational Site 12457 | South Bend | Indiana | United States | |
36 | Teva Investigational Site 12446 | Bangor | Maine | United States | |
37 | Teva Investigational Site 12602 | Columbia | Maryland | United States | |
38 | Teva Investigational Site 12432 | Fall River | Massachusetts | United States | |
39 | Teva Investigational Site 12441 | North Dartmouth | Massachusetts | United States | |
40 | Teva Investigational Site 12466 | North Dartmouth | Massachusetts | United States | |
41 | Teva Investigational Site 13001 | Royal Oak | Michigan | United States | |
42 | Teva Investigational Site 12428 | Ypsilanti | Michigan | United States | |
43 | Teva Investigational Site 13020 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | |
44 | Teva Investigational Site 12451 | Columbia | Missouri | United States | |
45 | Teva Investigational Site 12421 | Rolla | Missouri | United States | |
46 | Teva Investigational Site 12412 | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | |
47 | Teva Investigational Site 12453 | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | |
48 | Teva Investigational Site 12610 | Missoula | Montana | United States | |
49 | Teva Investigational Site 13021 | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | |
50 | Teva Investigational Site 12409 | Skillman | New Jersey | United States | |
51 | Teva Investigational Site 12603 | Bronx | New York | United States | |
52 | Teva Investigational Site 12464 | Brooklyn | New York | United States | |
53 | Teva Investigational Site 12430 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | |
54 | Teva Investigational Site 12407 | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States | |
55 | Teva Investigational Site 12415 | Canton | Ohio | United States | |
56 | Teva Investigational Site 12455 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | |
57 | Teva Investigational Site 12463 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | |
58 | Teva Investigational Site 12460 | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | United States | |
59 | Teva Investigational Site 12426 | Edmond | Oklahoma | United States | |
60 | Teva Investigational Site 13008 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | |
61 | Teva Investigational Site 12406 | Medford | Oregon | United States | |
62 | Teva Investigational Site 12442 | Portland | Oregon | United States | |
63 | Teva Investigational Site 12563 | Normal | Pennsylvania | United States | |
64 | Teva Investigational Site 12443 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | |
65 | Teva Investigational Site 12438 | Upland | Pennsylvania | United States | |
66 | Teva Investigational Site 12408 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | |
67 | Teva Investigational Site 12431 | Greenville | South Carolina | United States | |
68 | Teva Investigational Site 12465 | Mount Pleasant | South Carolina | United States | |
69 | Teva Investigational Site 12467 | Mount Pleasant | South Carolina | United States | |
70 | Teva Investigational Site 12420 | Orangeburg | South Carolina | United States | |
71 | Teva Investigational Site 12433 | Rock Hill | South Carolina | United States | |
72 | Teva Investigational Site 13003 | Knoxville | Tennessee | United States | |
73 | Teva Investigational Site 12425 | Arlington | Texas | United States | |
74 | Teva Investigational Site 12416 | Dallas | Texas | United States | |
75 | Teva Investigational Site 12418 | Dallas | Texas | United States | |
76 | Teva Investigational Site 12440 | El Paso | Texas | United States | |
77 | Teva Investigational Site 12447 | Killeen | Texas | United States | |
78 | Teva Investigational Site 13318 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | |
79 | Teva Investigational Site 13002 | Sugar Land | Texas | United States | |
80 | Teva Investigational Site 12424 | Waco | Texas | United States | |
81 | Teva Investigational Site 12422 | South Burlington | Vermont | United States | |
82 | Teva Investigational Site 12605 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | |
83 | Teva Investigational Site 12436 | Spokane | Washington | United States | |
84 | Teva Investigational Site 12564 | Tacoma | Washington | United States | |
85 | Teva Investigational Site 12448 | Greenfield | Wisconsin | United States | |
86 | Teva Investigational Site 11072 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
87 | Teva Investigational Site 11075 | Vancouver | Quebec | Canada | |
88 | Teva Investigational Site 54096 | Jindrichuv Hradec | Czechia | ||
89 | Teva Investigational Site 54098 | Praha | Czechia | ||
90 | Teva Investigational Site 54095 | Rokycany | Czechia | ||
91 | Teva Investigational Site 54094 | Strakonice | Czechia | ||
92 | Teva Investigational Site 51149 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
93 | Teva Investigational Site 51155 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
94 | Teva Investigational Site 51157 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
95 | Teva Investigational Site 51161 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
96 | Teva Investigational Site 51154 | Debrecen | Hungary | ||
97 | Teva Investigational Site 51152 | Deszk | Hungary | ||
98 | Teva Investigational Site 51170 | Dombovar | Hungary | ||
99 | Teva Investigational Site 51158 | Kiskunhalas | Hungary | ||
100 | Teva Investigational Site 51153 | Miskolc | Hungary | ||
101 | Teva Investigational Site 51156 | Mosdós | Hungary | ||
102 | Teva Investigational Site 51150 | Nyíregyháza | Hungary | ||
103 | Teva Investigational Site 51151 | Nyíregyháza | Hungary | ||
104 | Teva Investigational Site 51146 | Szeged | Hungary | ||
105 | Teva Investigational Site 51162 | Szigetvár | Hungary | ||
106 | Teva Investigational Site 51147 | Szombathely | Hungary | ||
107 | Teva Investigational Site 51148 | Százhalombatta | Hungary | ||
108 | Teva Investigational Site 51176 | Tatabánya | Hungary | ||
109 | Teva Investigational Site 51177 | Törökbálint | Hungary | ||
110 | Teva Investigational Site 53199 | Bialystok | Poland | ||
111 | Teva Investigational Site 53200 | Bialystok | Poland | ||
112 | Teva Investigational Site 53202 | Bialystok | Poland | ||
113 | Teva Investigational Site 53208 | Bialystok | Poland | ||
114 | Teva Investigational Site 53210 | Bydgoszcz | Poland | ||
115 | Teva Investigational Site 53227 | Bydgoszcz | Poland | ||
116 | Teva Investigational Site 53225 | Debica | Poland | ||
117 | Teva Investigational Site 53203 | Gdansk | Poland | ||
118 | Teva Investigational Site 53205 | Krakow | Poland | ||
119 | Teva Investigational Site 53195 | Kraków | Poland | ||
120 | Teva Investigational Site 53197 | Kraków | Poland | ||
121 | Teva Investigational Site 53228 | Lodz | Poland | ||
122 | Teva Investigational Site 53240 | Lodz | Poland | ||
123 | Teva Investigational Site 53241 | Lublin | Poland | ||
124 | Teva Investigational Site 53201 | Lódz | Poland | ||
125 | Teva Investigational Site 53229 | Lódz | Poland | ||
126 | Teva Investigational Site 53206 | Poznan | Poland | ||
127 | Teva Investigational Site 53211 | Poznan | Poland | ||
128 | Teva Investigational Site 53230 | Strzelce Opolskie | Poland | ||
129 | Teva Investigational Site 53196 | Tarnów | Poland | ||
130 | Teva Investigational Site 53222 | Warszawa | Poland | ||
131 | Teva Investigational Site 53198 | Wroclaw | Poland | ||
132 | Teva Investigational Site 53224 | Wroclaw | Poland | ||
133 | Teva Investigational Site 50255 | Chelyabinsk | Russian Federation | ||
134 | Teva Investigational Site 50243 | Ekaterinburg | Russian Federation | ||
135 | Teva Investigational Site 50241 | Kazan | Russian Federation | ||
136 | Teva Investigational Site 50250 | Moscow | Russian Federation | ||
137 | Teva Investigational Site 50252 | Moscow | Russian Federation | ||
138 | Teva Investigational Site 50246 | Saint Petersburg | Russian Federation | ||
139 | Teva Investigational Site 50242 | Saint-Petersburg | Russian Federation | ||
140 | Teva Investigational Site 50254 | Saratov | Russian Federation | ||
141 | Teva Investigational Site 50245 | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | ||
142 | Teva Investigational Site 50244 | Tomsk | Russian Federation | ||
143 | Teva Investigational Site 50251 | Voronezh | Russian Federation | ||
144 | Teva Investigational Site 50275 | Yaroslavl | Russian Federation | ||
145 | Teva Investigational Site 90011 | Berea | South Africa | ||
146 | Teva Investigational Site 90015 | Bloemfontein | South Africa | ||
147 | Teva Investigational Site 90012 | Cape Town | South Africa | ||
148 | Teva Investigational Site 90013 | Centurion | South Africa | ||
149 | Teva Investigational Site 90016 | Middelburg | South Africa | ||
150 | Teva Investigational Site 90014 | Pretoria | South Africa | ||
151 | Teva Investigational Site 12404 | Papillion | NE | Thailand | |
152 | Teva Investigational Site 58133 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | ||
153 | Teva Investigational Site 58135 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | ||
154 | Teva Investigational Site 58132 | Kyiv | Ukraine |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Teva Medical Expert, MD, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- FSS-AS-30017
- 2014-000923-25
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | A total of 1661 patients with persistent asthma were screened and 882 patients enrolled. 154 patients were not randomized, most commonly (76 patients) because of not meeting randomization criteria. |
Arm/Group Title | Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg BID | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All enrolled participants used single-blind fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler twice a day for a total daily dose of 100 mcg during the Run-In Period (14-21 days). | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Period Title: Run-In Period (Pre-assignment) | ||||||
STARTED | 882 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 728 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 154 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Run-In Period (Pre-assignment) | ||||||
STARTED | 0 | 146 | 145 | 146 | 146 | 145 |
Intent to Treat Population | 0 | 146 | 145 | 146 | 146 | 145 |
Safety Population | 0 | 145 | 143 | 146 | 145 | 144 |
Full Analysis Set | 0 | 145 | 141 | 146 | 145 | 143 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 136 | 136 | 135 | 136 | 107 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 38 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 146 | 145 | 146 | 146 | 145 | 728 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
44.7
(16.93)
|
44.3
(14.88)
|
44.4
(16.36)
|
45.7
(15.64)
|
44.5
(16.05)
|
44.7
(15.95)
|
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
12
8.2%
|
8
5.5%
|
10
6.8%
|
9
6.2%
|
6
4.1%
|
45
6.2%
|
Adults (18-64 years) |
115
78.8%
|
125
86.2%
|
119
81.5%
|
124
84.9%
|
125
86.2%
|
608
83.5%
|
Adults (65-84 years) |
19
13%
|
12
8.3%
|
17
11.6%
|
13
8.9%
|
14
9.7%
|
75
10.3%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Female |
87
59.6%
|
79
54.5%
|
88
60.3%
|
94
64.4%
|
91
62.8%
|
439
60.3%
|
Male |
59
40.4%
|
66
45.5%
|
58
39.7%
|
52
35.6%
|
54
37.2%
|
289
39.7%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||||
White |
125
85.6%
|
112
77.2%
|
116
79.5%
|
111
76%
|
124
85.5%
|
588
80.8%
|
Black or African American |
20
13.7%
|
28
19.3%
|
23
15.8%
|
31
21.2%
|
18
12.4%
|
120
16.5%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
1.4%
|
0
0%
|
2
1.4%
|
4
0.5%
|
American Indian or Alaskan Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
1.4%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Other |
1
0.7%
|
5
3.4%
|
3
2.1%
|
4
2.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
14
1.9%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Not Hispanic or Latino |
136
93.2%
|
135
93.1%
|
136
93.2%
|
134
91.8%
|
136
93.8%
|
677
93%
|
Hispanic or Latino |
10
6.8%
|
10
6.9%
|
10
6.8%
|
11
7.5%
|
8
5.5%
|
49
6.7%
|
Unknown |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
2
0.3%
|
History of Smoking (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Prior Smoker |
20
13.7%
|
28
19.3%
|
21
14.4%
|
28
19.2%
|
23
15.9%
|
120
16.5%
|
No tobacco use |
126
86.3%
|
117
80.7%
|
125
85.6%
|
118
80.8%
|
122
84.1%
|
608
83.5%
|
Previous Asthma Therapy (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Inhaled corticosteroid |
73
50%
|
67
46.2%
|
63
43.2%
|
58
39.7%
|
68
46.9%
|
329
45.2%
|
Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist |
73
50%
|
78
53.8%
|
83
56.8%
|
88
60.3%
|
77
53.1%
|
399
54.8%
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
29.4
(7.35)
|
30.2
(7.60)
|
29.9
(7.27)
|
29.9
(7.62)
|
29.3
(7.41)
|
29.7
(7.44)
|
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) (liters) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [liters] |
2.083
(0.6532)
|
2.157
(0.6402)
|
2.075
(0.5696)
|
2.069
(0.6017)
|
2.141
(0.6849)
|
2.105
(0.6303)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12 |
---|---|
Description | A subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value. |
Time Frame | Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12. |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 68 | 58 | 61 | 64 | 61 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [liters] |
0.446
(0.0463)
|
0.442
(0.0496)
|
0.267
(0.0466)
|
0.260
(0.0463)
|
0.121
(0.0472)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the first in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0009 |
Comments | Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.179 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.074 to 0.285 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the second in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0010 |
Comments | Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.182 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.074 to 0.291 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the third in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.326 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.221 to 0.431 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fourth in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.322 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.212 to 0.432 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12 |
---|---|
Description | Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1). |
Time Frame | Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
If the patient inadvertently administered asthma medication/study drug at home on the AM of the visit, or if the patient took rescue medication within 6 hours of testing, the visit was rescheduled. |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 143 | 140 | 145 | 144 | 143 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [liters] |
0.272
(0.0307)
|
0.271
(0.0311)
|
0.179
(0.0308)
|
0.119
(0.0311)
|
-0.004
(0.0312)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fifth in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.276 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.191 to 0.361 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the sixth in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.274 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.189 to 0.360 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the seventh in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.183 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.098 to 0.268 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the eighth in the sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0047 |
Comments | Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.123 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.038 to 0.208 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week. |
Time Frame | Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 141 | 146 | 145 | 142 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [liters/minute] |
20.235
(2.3845)
|
18.610
(2.4137)
|
7.464
(2.3887)
|
5.731
(2.4102)
|
-10.987
(2.4784)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 18.450 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 11.751 to 25.150 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 16.718 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 9.988 to 23.449 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 31.221 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 24.513 to 37.930 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 29.597 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 22.839 to 36.354 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0002 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 12.771 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 6.179 to 19.363 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0002 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 12.879 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 6.216 to 19.541 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0010 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 11.146 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 4.511 to 17.782 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period |
---|---|
Description | The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary. Daytime Symptom Score: 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms for 1 short period 2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods 3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities 4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM): 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early) 2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early) 3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). |
Time Frame | Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 141 | 146 | 145 | 142 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale] |
-0.391
(0.0328)
|
-0.364
(0.0332)
|
-0.242
(0.0329)
|
-0.282
(0.0333)
|
-0.087
(0.0342)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0010 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.156 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.248 to -0.063 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.195 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.288 to -0.102 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.304 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.397 to -0.212 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.277 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.370 to -0.184 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0014 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.149 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.239 to -0.058 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0818 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.082 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.174 to 0.010 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0094 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.121 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.213 to -0.030 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period |
---|---|
Description | Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures. |
Time Frame | Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 141 | 146 | 145 | 143 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [puffs] |
-0.898
(0.1069)
|
-0.821
(0.1080)
|
-0.534
(0.1070)
|
-0.439
(0.1081)
|
0.168
(0.1102)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.702 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.001 to -0.403 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0001 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.607 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.908 to -0.307 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -1.066 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.365 to -0.766 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.989 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.291 to -0.686 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0160 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.364 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.659 to -0.068 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0124 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | mixed model for repeated measures | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.382 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.681 to -0.083 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0588 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | -0.287 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.584 to 0.011 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12 |
---|---|
Description | The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment. |
Time Frame | up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 141 | 146 | 145 | 143 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [probability] |
0.9719
|
0.9929
|
0.9786
|
0.9930
|
0.8528
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0001 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0003 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7203 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.9960 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3250 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old |
---|---|
Description | The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life. |
Time Frame | Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set of participants who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 131 | 135 | 132 | 133 | 129 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale] |
0.534
(0.0741)
|
0.592
(0.0725)
|
0.384
(0.0742)
|
0.340
(0.0740)
|
-0.089
(0.0747)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 200 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.473 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.269 to 0.677 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Fp MDPI 100 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.428 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.224 to 0.632 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.623 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.418 to 0.828 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0000 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | 0.681 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.478 to 0.885 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1490 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.150 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.054 to 0.354 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0143 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.253 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.051 to 0.455 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg, Fp MDPI 200 mcg |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0435 |
Comments | Significance level of 0.05. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LSM difference |
Estimated Value | 0.209 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.006 to 0.411 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1 |
---|---|
Description | The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. Values of NA indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%. |
Time Frame | Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 68 | 58 | 61 | 64 | 61 |
15% improvement |
0.8
|
0.9
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
12% improvement |
0.4
|
0.4
|
6.9
|
NA
|
NA
|
Title | Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period |
---|---|
Description | An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. |
Time Frame | Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety population |
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Placebo MDPI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 143 | 146 | 145 | 144 |
>=1 TEAE |
61
41.8%
|
59
40.7%
|
60
41.1%
|
53
36.3%
|
52
35.9%
|
>=1 severe TEAE |
3
2.1%
|
2
1.4%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
>=1 treatment-related TEAE |
8
5.5%
|
4
2.8%
|
9
6.2%
|
6
4.1%
|
5
3.4%
|
>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE |
1
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
>=1 serious TEAE |
2
1.4%
|
2
1.4%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal |
2
1.4%
|
2
1.4%
|
0
0%
|
2
1.4%
|
2
1.4%
|
>=1 nonserious TEAE |
61
41.8%
|
58
40%
|
60
41.1%
|
52
35.6%
|
52
35.9%
|
>=1 TEAE resulting in death |
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Day 1 up to Week 14 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Placebo | |||||
Arm/Group Description | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication. | |||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/143 (1.4%) | 2/145 (1.4%) | 1/145 (0.7%) | 1/146 (0.7%) | 1/144 (0.7%) | |||||
General disorders | ||||||||||
Pyrexia | 0/143 (0%) | 0 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 1/146 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/144 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||
Jaundice | 1/143 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/146 (0%) | 0 | 0/144 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||
Pneumonia | 0/143 (0%) | 0 | 1/145 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/146 (0%) | 0 | 0/144 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||||
Breast cancer | 1/143 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/146 (0%) | 0 | 0/144 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||
Grand mal convulsion | 0/143 (0%) | 0 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 1/145 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/146 (0%) | 0 | 0/144 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||
Asthma | 0/143 (0%) | 0 | 1/145 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/145 (0%) | 0 | 0/146 (0%) | 0 | 1/144 (0.7%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg | FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg | Fp MDPI 100 mcg | Fp MDPI 200 mcg | Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 21/143 (14.7%) | 20/145 (13.8%) | 26/145 (17.9%) | 20/146 (13.7%) | 20/144 (13.9%) | |||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 10/143 (7%) | 10 | 10/145 (6.9%) | 12 | 7/145 (4.8%) | 7 | 7/146 (4.8%) | 8 | 8/144 (5.6%) | 9 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 6/143 (4.2%) | 6 | 6/145 (4.1%) | 6 | 9/145 (6.2%) | 11 | 8/146 (5.5%) | 9 | 7/144 (4.9%) | 7 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||
Headache | 6/143 (4.2%) | 21 | 4/145 (2.8%) | 5 | 11/145 (7.6%) | 18 | 7/146 (4.8%) | 7 | 7/144 (4.9%) | 10 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Sponsor has the right 60 days before submission for publication to review/provide comments. If the Sponsor's review shows that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure shall be delayed for up to 90 additional days in order for the Sponsor, or Sponsor's designees, to file the necessary patent applications. In multicenter trials, each PI will postpone single center publications until after disclosure or publication of multicenter data.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Director, Clinical Research |
---|---|
Organization | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. |
Phone | 215-591-3000 |
ustevatrials@tevapharm.com |
- FSS-AS-30017
- 2014-000923-25