RITA: Role of microRNAs in T Cell-Driven Inflammation in Asthma

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01484691
Collaborator
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (NIH)
55
1
3
42
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This will be a single center study of asthmatic subjects and healthy controls which will investigate mechanisms of asthma through detailed molecular analysis of airway tissues and fluids. The primary goal will be investigate the role of microRNAs in Th2-driven inflammation in asthma. The investigators hypothesize that asthma is associated with abnormal expression of miRNAs in T cells which favors differentiation into Th2-cells. The investigators further hypothesize that asthma is heterogeneous based on the presence and absence of Th2-driven inflammation and that abnormalities in T cell miRNA expression will be most prominent in a subgroup with high levels of Th2-driven inflammation (as assessed using molecular markers that the investigators have previously established). Finally, the investigators hypothesize that inhaled corticosteroids will normalize the T-cell miRNA abnormalities observed in asthma, as corticosteroids treat Th2-driven inflammation. The samples collected will also facilitate the pursuit of secondary analyses designed to investigate mechanisms of inflammation and remodeling in asthma as well as molecular phenotypes of asthma.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
55 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Role of miRNAs in Th2-driven Inflammation in Asthma
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Healthy non-asthmatic controls

Healthy non-asthmatic controls who will be studied at one point in time and serve as a control group for the baseline bronchoscopy and evaluation of T-cell miRNA expression.

Active Comparator: Asthmatics (treatment)

Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to inhaled budesonide, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline (before corticosteroids) and again after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

Drug: Budesonide
Inhaled powder of inhaled corticosteroid, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks
Other Names:
  • Pulmicort
  • No Intervention: Asthmatics (no treatment)

    Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of no inhaled corticosteroid treatment). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to no change in treatment for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline and again after 8 weeks without treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in Baseline T Cell miRNA Expression Between Asthmatics and Healthy Controls [Baseline (cross-sectional analysis)]

      Identification of T cell miRNAs which are differentially expressed in asthma as compared to healthy controls. The investigators will measure a panel of ~200 miRNAs by qPCR (yielding normalized copy numbers for each miR) and identify differential expressed based on a false discovery rate <0.05. Normalized copy numbers from this qPCR experiment were established using the "global mean-normalization" approach as described in the paper by Barbara D'haene et al. entitled "miRNA expression profiling - from reference genes to global mean normalization" published in MicroRNA Expression profiling Methods and Protocols, Springer Verlag, Feb 2011.

    2. Change From Baseline of T Cell miRNA Expression at 8 Weeks in Asthmatics in Response to Inhaled Corticosteroids vs. no Treatment [8 weeks after randomization to inhaled corticosteroids or no treatment]

      Identification of T cell miRNAs which were reduced in asthmatics who were randomized to inhaled corticosteroids as compared to those randomized to no treatment. The investigators will measure the same miRNAs by qPCR as identified in the other Primary Outcome and define a significant change using a multiple comparison adjusted p-value (false discovery rate <0.05).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Group A:
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male and female subjects between the ages of 18 and 70 years
    Group B:
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male and female subjects between the ages of 18 and 70 years

    • History of asthma

    • No use of oral or inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma in the past 6 weeks

    • Hyperreactivity to methacholine (PC20FEV1 Methacholine ≤ 8.0 mg/mL)

    • At least one of the following symptoms, beta agonist use, or FEV1 criteria:

    • Asthma symptoms on at least two days per week; OR

    • Beta agonist use on at least two days per week; OR

    • FEV1 < 85% predicted

    Groups A & B:
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Current smokers (smoking within the last 12 months) or former smokers who have a total pack-year smoking history greater than 10

    • Pregnant women

    • Subjects with a history of lung disease other than asthma

    • Subjects with a history of a medical disease, which in the opinion of the investigator may put the subject at extra risk from study-related procedures or because the disease may influence the results of the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, San Francisco
    • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Prescott G Woodruff, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of California, San Francisco
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01484691
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 11-07039
    First Posted:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 24, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Arm/Group Description Healthy non-asthmatic controls who will be studied at one point in time and serve as a control group for the baseline bronchoscopy and evaluation of T-cell miRNA expression. Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to inhaled budesonide, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline (before corticosteroids) and again after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Budesonide: Inhaled powder of inhaled corticosteroid, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of no inhaled corticosteroid treatment). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to no change in treatment for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline and again after 8 weeks without treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 21 22 12
    COMPLETED 20 19 10
    NOT COMPLETED 1 3 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment) Total
    Arm/Group Description Healthy non-asthmatic controls who will be studied at one point in time and serve as a control group for the baseline bronchoscopy and evaluation of T-cell miRNA expression. Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to inhaled budesonide, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline (before corticosteroids) and again after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Budesonide: Inhaled powder of inhaled corticosteroid, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of no inhaled corticosteroid treatment). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to no change in treatment for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline and again after 8 weeks without treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 20 19 11 50
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    30.05
    (5.34)
    26.15
    (5.01)
    32.72
    (13.49)
    29.16
    (7.63)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    11
    55%
    12
    63.2%
    5
    45.5%
    28
    56%
    Male
    9
    45%
    7
    36.8%
    6
    54.5%
    22
    44%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    2
    10%
    5
    26.3%
    1
    9.1%
    8
    16%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    15
    75%
    12
    63.2%
    8
    72.7%
    35
    70%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    3
    15%
    2
    10.5%
    2
    18.2%
    7
    14%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Asian
    5
    25%
    3
    15.8%
    2
    18.2%
    10
    20%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    4
    20%
    1
    5.3%
    0
    0%
    5
    10%
    White
    9
    45%
    9
    47.4%
    6
    54.5%
    24
    48%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    3
    15.8%
    0
    0%
    3
    6%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    2
    10%
    3
    15.8%
    3
    27.3%
    8
    16%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    20
    100%
    19
    100%
    11
    100%
    50
    100%
    FEV1 (liters) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [liters]
    3.68
    (0.93)
    3.41
    (1.01)
    3.52
    (0.97)
    3.54
    (0.99)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Difference in Baseline T Cell miRNA Expression Between Asthmatics and Healthy Controls
    Description Identification of T cell miRNAs which are differentially expressed in asthma as compared to healthy controls. The investigators will measure a panel of ~200 miRNAs by qPCR (yielding normalized copy numbers for each miR) and identify differential expressed based on a false discovery rate <0.05. Normalized copy numbers from this qPCR experiment were established using the "global mean-normalization" approach as described in the paper by Barbara D'haene et al. entitled "miRNA expression profiling - from reference genes to global mean normalization" published in MicroRNA Expression profiling Methods and Protocols, Springer Verlag, Feb 2011.
    Time Frame Baseline (cross-sectional analysis)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The study enrolled two groups of subjects: 1. Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, 2. Asthmatics (who were subsequently randomized to inhaled corticosteroids or no treatment). This analysis compares pre-randomization values in group 1 healthy non-asthmatics controls to group 2 asthmatics because the scientific goal is to identify miRNAs differentially expressed in asthma.
    Arm/Group Title Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Arm/Group Description Healthy non-asthmatic controls who underwent bronchoscopy at one time point and served as a control group for the asthmatics group for evaluation of T-cell miRNA expression. All steroid-naïve asthmatics. These subjects were studied before and after randomization to study drug or no treatment. The pre-randomization data were collected on these asthmatics as one uniform group for comparison to healthy controls. These subjects then underwent bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at pre-randomization and again 8 weeks after randomization to inhaled corticosteroids or no treatment.
    Measure Participants 19 25
    mir1
    13.2
    (5.5)
    10.2
    (3.0)
    mir107
    13.6
    (4.5)
    11.7
    (3.2)
    mir128
    17.0
    (5.9)
    16.5
    (3.9)
    mir141
    14.6
    (4.5)
    13.3
    (2.0)
    mir148b
    14.5
    (5.2)
    11.9
    (3.3)
    mir181b
    11.5
    (5.5)
    10.8
    (2.6)
    mir185
    12.7
    (5.0)
    10.7
    (2.4)
    mir194
    11.5
    (8.1)
    8.7
    (3.5)
    mir19a
    13.8
    (7.1)
    10.4
    (2.5)
    mir200a
    14.9
    (7.2)
    14.9
    (3.1)
    mir22
    14.2
    (6.2)
    12.3
    (2.9)
    mir223
    12.3
    (4.6)
    10.7
    (1.4)
    mir23a
    14.2
    (5.0)
    13.6
    (2.8)
    mir26a
    10.2
    (6.7)
    9.4
    (2.8)
    mir320b
    13.8
    (3.4)
    12.4
    (2.6)
    mir598
    12.4
    (2.1)
    13.4
    (2.2)
    mir720
    12.1
    (5.2)
    11.6
    (5.1)
    mir1915
    7.7
    (1.6)
    8.8
    (1.1)
    mir1978
    11.7
    (3.7)
    13.1
    (2.6)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.04
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir107
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 1.91
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir128
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.47
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir141
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.42
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.27
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir148b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.55
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir181b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.68
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir185
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.94
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir194
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.77
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir19a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.38
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir200a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.99
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.00
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir22
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.92
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir223
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.57
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir23a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.52
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir26a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.81
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir320b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.39
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir598
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.92
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir720
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.55
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1915
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.30
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -1.12
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1978
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -1.35
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline of T Cell miRNA Expression at 8 Weeks in Asthmatics in Response to Inhaled Corticosteroids vs. no Treatment
    Description Identification of T cell miRNAs which were reduced in asthmatics who were randomized to inhaled corticosteroids as compared to those randomized to no treatment. The investigators will measure the same miRNAs by qPCR as identified in the other Primary Outcome and define a significant change using a multiple comparison adjusted p-value (false discovery rate <0.05).
    Time Frame 8 weeks after randomization to inhaled corticosteroids or no treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    This analysis population had two groups: 1. Asthmatics who were randomized to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, 2. Asthmatics who were randomized to no treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Arm/Group Description Asthmatics randomized to inhaled budesonide, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at pre-randomization (before corticosteroids) and again after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Budesonide: Inhaled powder of inhaled corticosteroid, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks Asthmatics randomized to no treatment with inhaled corticosteroids for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at pre-randomization and again 8 weeks after randomization to no treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
    Measure Participants 14 7
    mir1
    1.5
    (4.6)
    -3.0
    (4.5)
    mir107
    0.86
    (4.4)
    -3.7
    (4.0)
    mir128
    2.0
    (3.6)
    -1.6
    (2.2)
    mir141
    1.2
    (3.0)
    1.7
    (3.7)
    mir148b
    1.5
    (5.0)
    -3.1
    (4.4)
    mir181b
    -0.12
    (4.9)
    -1.7
    (4.3)
    mir185
    0.72
    (3.8)
    -2.2
    (3.4)
    mir194
    -0.73
    (5.3)
    -0.37
    (2.8)
    mir19a
    0.053
    (3.8)
    -2.4
    (3.0)
    mir200a
    -1.4
    (3.9)
    -2.2
    (2.4)
    mir22
    0.059
    (4.6)
    -2.7
    (3.7)
    mir223
    0.90
    (3.3)
    -1.0
    (3.0)
    mir23a
    1.5
    (3.8)
    -2.8
    (1.5)
    mir26a
    1.2
    (3.6)
    -0.43
    (5.4)
    mir320b
    0.86
    (7.6)
    1.8
    (3.7)
    mir598
    -0.20
    (3.3)
    -3.5
    (3.0)
    mir720
    -1.9
    (6.6)
    -0.87
    (4.3)
    mir1915
    -0.49
    (2.1)
    0.26
    (1.7)
    mir1978
    2.3
    (5.1)
    -1.5
    (2.5)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.26
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 4.53
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir107
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.26
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 4.52
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir128
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.26
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.57
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir141
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.87
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.58
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir148b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.29
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 4.57
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir181b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.75
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.56
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir185
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.36
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.90
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir194
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.89
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.36
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir19a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.48
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.48
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir200a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.87
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 0.75
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir22
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.53
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.78
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir223
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.57
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.91
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir23a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.26
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 4.27
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir26a
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.75
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 1.66
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir320b
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.89
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.91
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir598
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.26
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.32
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir720
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.87
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.99
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1915
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.74
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.75
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls, Asthmatics (Baseline)
    Comments mir1978
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.36
    Comments This p value is adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach and a p value <0.05 is taken for significance.
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.77
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Participants were monitored for adverse events during their study participation, which ranged from 2 weeks to 10 weeks depending on the group to which they were assigned.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Arm/Group Description Healthy non-asthmatic controls who will be studied at one point in time and serve as a control group for the baseline bronchoscopy and evaluation of T-cell miRNA expression. Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to inhaled budesonide, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline (before corticosteroids) and again after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Budesonide: Inhaled powder of inhaled corticosteroid, 1 puff (180mcg) twice a day for 8-10 weeks Steroid-naïve asthma (randomized to 8 weeks of no inhaled corticosteroid treatment). Asthmatics not on inhaled corticosteroids, randomized to no change in treatment for 8-10 weeks. These subjects will undergo bronchoscopy and T-cell miRNA measurement at baseline and again after 8 weeks without treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
    All Cause Mortality
    Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/21 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/12 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/21 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%) 0/12 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Medication error during bronchoscopy 0/21 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1 0/12 (0%) 0
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Healthy Non-asthmatic Controls Asthmatics (Treatment) Asthmatics (no Treatment)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 3/21 (14.3%) 1/22 (4.5%) 2/12 (16.7%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Decreased systolic blood pressure from sedation 0/21 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/12 (8.3%)
    Decreased lung function post-procedure 3/21 (14.3%) 1/22 (4.5%) 1/12 (8.3%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title PI: Prescott G. Woodruff, MD, MPH
    Organization University of California, San Francisco
    Phone 415-514-2061
    Email prescott.woodruff@ucsf.edu
    Responsible Party:
    University of California, San Francisco
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01484691
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 11-07039
    First Posted:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 24, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022