Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Small amounts of astigmatism are often uncorrected in contact lens wearers. The effect with respect to driving is unknown, but it could threaten safe operation of a motor vehicle, especially under conditions such as nighttime driving when visual abilities are highly challenged. This study measures driving-specific visual abilities and simulated driving performance in participants with astigmatism who either have or do not have their astigmatism corrected. The primary hypothesis is that at a tactical level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in safer driving performance overall. The secondary hypothesis is that at an operational level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in better driving-specific visual performance.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Safe driving relies heavily on "good vision." Good vision while driving relates to multiple abilities, such as dynamic visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, management of glare and peripheral vision, etc. While spherical contact lenses address issues of correction of visual acuity as determined by forward static vision tests, if they do not provide visual acuity both immediately and smoothly with eye movement then vision can be compromised. Glare can be a problem as well when contact lenses are off center. Fluctuating vision as a result of lens movement on the eye could be especially problematic and frustrating for patients who have astigmatism. Furthermore, experiencing moments of blurred vision no matter how brief can be potentially hazardous while driving. The 1DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses have a unique blink-activated stabilization system to prevent rotation of the lens on the eye, and may have significant visual advantages for drivers with astigmatism. These lenses provide continuous corrected acuity compared to non-ballasted contact lenses, and thus are potentially safer for driving. Contact comparison will consist of 1DAY ACUVUE® MOIST (spherical control) versus 1*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM (the daily disposable astigmatism alternative).
The study will investigate the potential advantages of contact lenses specifically designed to correct for astigmatism, compared to similar correction with spherical contacts, for adult licensed drivers with astigmatism, employing a double-blind (subjects and research assistant blind to hypotheses), randomized, cross-over design (spherical, vs. astigmatism contacts).
This will be a multi-stage study comprised of the following:
Preliminary study to determine the likelihood of detecting a significant difference between the standard spherical and astigmatism contacts in a full Randomize Clinical Trial (n=12; data and power analysis)
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Lens sequence 1 No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Experimental: Lens sequence 2 No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Experimental: Lens sequence 3 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Experimental: Lens sequence 4 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Experimental: Lens sequence 5 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Experimental: Lens sequence 6 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses |
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests
Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Tactical Composite Score [1 day laboratory study]
Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Operational Composite Score [1 day laboratory study]
Z-score composite of operational testing outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult licensed drivers between the ages of 18-39, similar number of males and females will be studied who meet the following inclusion criteria:
-
Bilateral corrected vision of 20/40 or better
-
Bilateral astigmatism between 0.75 to 2.0 diopters, with spherical correction from -1 to -6
-
No active eye infection
-
No defective peripheral vision
-
Do not have correction for bifocals
-
Routinely wear contact lenses more than 4 times per week
-
Routinely drive a car more than 4 times week
-
Do not have a history of motion, sea or big screen (e.g. IMAX) sickness or experience persistent Simulation Adaptation Syndrome
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Bilateral corrected vision of worse than 20/40
-
No astigmatism
-
Active eye infection
-
Defective peripheral vision
-
Wear bifocals
-
Wears contact lenses less than 4 times per week
-
Drives infrequently (less than 4 times per week)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Virginia Driving Safety Lab | Charlottesville | Virginia | United States | 22908 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Virginia
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel J Cox, Ph.D., University of Virginia
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 15920
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Lens Sequence 1 | Lens Sequence 2 | Lens Sequence 3 | Lens Sequence 4 | Lens Sequence 5 | Lens Sequence 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | None; Sphere; Toric | None; Toric; Sphere | Sphere; None; Toric | Sphere; Toric; None | Toric; None; Sphere | Toric; Sphere; None |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||||
STARTED | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Contact Lens Sequence |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Order in which each participant received the 3 lens conditions |
Overall Participants | 11 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
22.2
(4.60)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
2
18.2%
|
Male |
9
81.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
11
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Tactical Composite Score |
---|---|
Description | Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes |
Time Frame | 1 day laboratory study |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Contact Lens Rx |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants |
Measure Participants | 9 |
None |
-1.73
(3.53)
|
Sphere |
0.19
(2.62)
|
Toric |
1.54
(1.75)
|
Title | Operational Composite Score |
---|---|
Description | Z-score composite of operational testing outcomes |
Time Frame | 1 day laboratory study |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Contact Lens Rx |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants |
Measure Participants | 11 |
None |
-2.77
(4.30)
|
Sphere |
1.37
(2.37)
|
Toric |
1.40
(2.65)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 day | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Participants were assessed for Simulation Adaptation Syndrome by using a rating scale after each of their 3 simulated driving periods. | |
Arm/Group Title | Contact Lens Rx | |
Arm/Group Description | None; Sphere; Toric | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Contact Lens Rx | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Contact Lens Rx | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/11 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Contact Lens Rx | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/11 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Project Coordinator |
---|---|
Organization | UVa Center for Behavioral Medicine Research |
Phone | 434-924-8656 |
tab2v@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu |
- 15920