Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism

Sponsor
University of Virginia (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02624791
Collaborator
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Industry)
11
1
6
4
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Small amounts of astigmatism are often uncorrected in contact lens wearers. The effect with respect to driving is unknown, but it could threaten safe operation of a motor vehicle, especially under conditions such as nighttime driving when visual abilities are highly challenged. This study measures driving-specific visual abilities and simulated driving performance in participants with astigmatism who either have or do not have their astigmatism corrected. The primary hypothesis is that at a tactical level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in safer driving performance overall. The secondary hypothesis is that at an operational level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in better driving-specific visual performance.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
  • Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
  • Other: No contact lenses
N/A

Detailed Description

Safe driving relies heavily on "good vision." Good vision while driving relates to multiple abilities, such as dynamic visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, management of glare and peripheral vision, etc. While spherical contact lenses address issues of correction of visual acuity as determined by forward static vision tests, if they do not provide visual acuity both immediately and smoothly with eye movement then vision can be compromised. Glare can be a problem as well when contact lenses are off center. Fluctuating vision as a result of lens movement on the eye could be especially problematic and frustrating for patients who have astigmatism. Furthermore, experiencing moments of blurred vision no matter how brief can be potentially hazardous while driving. The 1DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses have a unique blink-activated stabilization system to prevent rotation of the lens on the eye, and may have significant visual advantages for drivers with astigmatism. These lenses provide continuous corrected acuity compared to non-ballasted contact lenses, and thus are potentially safer for driving. Contact comparison will consist of 1DAY ACUVUE® MOIST (spherical control) versus 1*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM (the daily disposable astigmatism alternative).

The study will investigate the potential advantages of contact lenses specifically designed to correct for astigmatism, compared to similar correction with spherical contacts, for adult licensed drivers with astigmatism, employing a double-blind (subjects and research assistant blind to hypotheses), randomized, cross-over design (spherical, vs. astigmatism contacts).

This will be a multi-stage study comprised of the following:

Preliminary study to determine the likelihood of detecting a significant difference between the standard spherical and astigmatism contacts in a full Randomize Clinical Trial (n=12; data and power analysis)

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
11 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Masking Description:
participants and research assistant blind to hypothesis
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Lens sequence 1

No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Experimental: Lens sequence 2

No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Experimental: Lens sequence 3

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Experimental: Lens sequence 4

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Experimental: Lens sequence 5

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Experimental: Lens sequence 6

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses
spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses
toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Other: No contact lenses
simulated driving tests

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Tactical Composite Score [1 day laboratory study]

    Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Operational Composite Score [1 day laboratory study]

    Z-score composite of operational testing outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult licensed drivers between the ages of 18-39, similar number of males and females will be studied who meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • Bilateral corrected vision of 20/40 or better

  • Bilateral astigmatism between 0.75 to 2.0 diopters, with spherical correction from -1 to -6

  • No active eye infection

  • No defective peripheral vision

  • Do not have correction for bifocals

  • Routinely wear contact lenses more than 4 times per week

  • Routinely drive a car more than 4 times week

  • Do not have a history of motion, sea or big screen (e.g. IMAX) sickness or experience persistent Simulation Adaptation Syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Bilateral corrected vision of worse than 20/40

  • No astigmatism

  • Active eye infection

  • Defective peripheral vision

  • Wear bifocals

  • Wears contact lenses less than 4 times per week

  • Drives infrequently (less than 4 times per week)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Virginia Driving Safety Lab Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Virginia
  • Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel J Cox, Ph.D., University of Virginia

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Daniel Cox, PhD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry and NB Sciences, University of Virginia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02624791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 15920
First Posted:
Dec 8, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Mar 6, 2020
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Keywords provided by Daniel Cox, PhD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry and NB Sciences, University of Virginia
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Lens Sequence 1 Lens Sequence 2 Lens Sequence 3 Lens Sequence 4 Lens Sequence 5 Lens Sequence 6
Arm/Group Description None; Sphere; Toric None; Toric; Sphere Sphere; None; Toric Sphere; Toric; None Toric; None; Sphere Toric; Sphere; None
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 2 1 2 2 2 2
COMPLETED 0 1 2 2 2 2
NOT COMPLETED 2 0 0 0 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Contact Lens Sequence
Arm/Group Description Order in which each participant received the 3 lens conditions
Overall Participants 11
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
22.2
(4.60)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
2
18.2%
Male
9
81.8%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
11
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Tactical Composite Score
Description Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes
Time Frame 1 day laboratory study

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Contact Lens Rx
Arm/Group Description All study participants
Measure Participants 9
None
-1.73
(3.53)
Sphere
0.19
(2.62)
Toric
1.54
(1.75)
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Operational Composite Score
Description Z-score composite of operational testing outcomes
Time Frame 1 day laboratory study

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Contact Lens Rx
Arm/Group Description All study participants
Measure Participants 11
None
-2.77
(4.30)
Sphere
1.37
(2.37)
Toric
1.40
(2.65)

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1 day
Adverse Event Reporting Description Participants were assessed for Simulation Adaptation Syndrome by using a rating scale after each of their 3 simulated driving periods.
Arm/Group Title Contact Lens Rx
Arm/Group Description None; Sphere; Toric
All Cause Mortality
Contact Lens Rx
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Contact Lens Rx
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/11 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Contact Lens Rx
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/11 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

small number of subjects analyzed

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Project Coordinator
Organization UVa Center for Behavioral Medicine Research
Phone 434-924-8656
Email tab2v@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
Responsible Party:
Daniel Cox, PhD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry and NB Sciences, University of Virginia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02624791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 15920
First Posted:
Dec 8, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Mar 6, 2020
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2020