Dispensing Evaluation of New Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lens.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new daily disposable toric soft contact lens against a daily disposable toric contact lens currently available in market, specifically with regards to the comfort and vision with the lens.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Etafilcon A toric contact lens/Nelfilcon A toric Etafilcon A toric contact lens first, then nelfilcon A toric second |
Device: Etafilcon A toric contact lens
contact lens to correct astigmatism
Device: Nelfilcon A toric contact lens
contact lens to correct astigmatism
|
Other: Nelfilcon A toric/ Etafilcon A toric Nelfilcon A toric contact lens first, then etafilcon A toric toric second |
Device: Etafilcon A toric contact lens
contact lens to correct astigmatism
Device: Nelfilcon A toric contact lens
contact lens to correct astigmatism
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Monocular Visual Acuity on LogMAR Scale [After 5 to 9 days of lens wear]
Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice for each eye. Visual acuity describes the acuteness or sharpness of vision; the ability to perceive small details. Visual acuity is a measure of spacial resolution of the visual processing system; it's tested by requiring the person being tested to identify characters (like letters and numbers)on a chart from a set distance. LogMAR charts are used to assess visual acuity for research studies. LogMAR means Minimum Angle of Resolution. This has lead to the assertion that research is done using a logarithmic progression in size of letters on a test chart gives the most accurate visual acuity measurement. The reason for this is, unlike other charts, LogMAR chart has equal gradation between the letters on the line and the space between the lines. And, there is a fixed number of letters per line.
- Binocular Visual Acuity on LogMAR Scale [After 5 to 9 days of lens wear]
Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice binocularly. Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice for each eye. Visual acuity describes the acuteness or sharpness of vision; the ability to perceive small details. Visual acuity is a measure of spacial resolution of the visual processing system; it's tested by requiring the person being tested to identify characters (like letters and numbers)on a chart from a set distance. LogMAR charts are used to assess visual acuity for research studies. LogMAR means Minimum Angle of Resolution. This has lead to the assertion that research is done using a logarithmic progression in size of letters on a test chart gives the most accurate visual acuity measurement. The reason for this is, unlike other charts, LogMAR chart has equal gradation between the letters on the line and the space between the lines. And, there is a fixed number of letters per line.
- Subject Reported Overall Lens Comfort Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation (CLUE)TM Questionnaire [After 5 to 9 days of lens wear]
The Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3*SD).
- Subject Reported Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM Questionnaire. [After 5 to 9 days of lens wear]
The Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3*SD).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
The subject must be between 18 and 40 years old.
-
The subject must have normal eyes.
-
The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
-
The subject must read and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and be provided a copy of the form.
-
The subject must have a subjective distance spectacle prescription in the range of -1.75 to -5.00D in each eye.
-
The subject must manifest -1.25 to -2.00 D of refractive astigmatism in each eye.
-
The subject's refractive cylinder axis must be 180 degrees plus or minus 30 degrees in each eye.
-
The subject must be an adapted wearer of soft toric contact lenses in both eyes.
-
The subject's best visual acuity (BVA) must be better than or equal to 20/25 in each eye.
-
Subjects must already possess a wearable pair of spectacles.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Ocular or systemic allergies or disease that may interfere with contact lens wear.
-
Systemic disease or autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
-
Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining or any other abnormality of the cornea, which may contraindicate contact lens wear.
-
Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities that might interfere with contact lens wear.
-
Any ocular infection.
-
Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
-
Pregnancy or lactation
-
Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
-
Diabetes
-
Strabismus
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90049 | |
2 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32205 | |
3 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32256 | |
4 | Marietta | Georgia | United States | 30060 | |
5 | New York | New York | United States | 10001 | |
6 | Warwick | Rhode Island | United States | 02886 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CR-1476AG
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | One subject failed screening, and did not enter group assignment |
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A Toric Lens First/ Nelfilcon A Toric Lens Second | Nelfilcon A Toric Lens First/Etafilcon A Toric Lens Second |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Etafilcon A toric contact lens worn daily during first period of 5 - 9 days, then nelfilcon A toric contact lens worn daily during second period of 5 - 9 days | Nelfilcon A toric contact lens worn daily during first period of 5 - 9 days, then etafilcon A toric contact lens worn daily during second period of 5 - 9 days |
Period Title: Period 1 (5-9 Days) | ||
STARTED | 36 | 33 |
COMPLETED | 35 | 33 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 |
Period Title: Period 1 (5-9 Days) | ||
STARTED | 35 | 33 |
COMPLETED | 35 | 32 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Subjects |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects who completed the study. |
Overall Participants | 69 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
29.1
(5.27)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
45
65.2%
|
Male |
24
34.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
69
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Monocular Visual Acuity on LogMAR Scale |
---|---|
Description | Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice for each eye. Visual acuity describes the acuteness or sharpness of vision; the ability to perceive small details. Visual acuity is a measure of spacial resolution of the visual processing system; it's tested by requiring the person being tested to identify characters (like letters and numbers)on a chart from a set distance. LogMAR charts are used to assess visual acuity for research studies. LogMAR means Minimum Angle of Resolution. This has lead to the assertion that research is done using a logarithmic progression in size of letters on a test chart gives the most accurate visual acuity measurement. The reason for this is, unlike other charts, LogMAR chart has equal gradation between the letters on the line and the space between the lines. And, there is a fixed number of letters per line. |
Time Frame | After 5 to 9 days of lens wear |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully complete the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens) | Nelfilcon A Toric (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Etafilcon A toric is a daily disposable hydrogel toric lens with the addition of a wetting agent, developed for a wider ranged of prescriptions; worn for 5-9 days | An existing, daily disposable toric contact lens; worn 5-9 days |
Measure Participants | 67 | 67 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [logMAR] |
-0.065
(0.0777)
|
-0.038
(0.1057)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens), Nelfilcon A Toric (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Ho:The test lens is non-inferior to the active comparator lens for monocular visual performance on logMAR scale at 1-week follow-up. A non-inferiority margin of 0.05 logMAR was used. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | Based on historical data, a minimum of 42 subjects is needed to achieve 80% power with 0.05 type I error. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least-square mean difference |
Estimated Value | -0.037 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.041 to -0.0013 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.0072 |
|
Estimation Comments | Comparison between study lenses was carried out using 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the least-square mean difference(test minus control). The non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the confidence limit is below 0.05 LogMAR. |
Title | Binocular Visual Acuity on LogMAR Scale |
---|---|
Description | Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice binocularly. Distance (4 meter) high contrast standard resolution (ETDRS) acuity was measured twice for each eye. Visual acuity describes the acuteness or sharpness of vision; the ability to perceive small details. Visual acuity is a measure of spacial resolution of the visual processing system; it's tested by requiring the person being tested to identify characters (like letters and numbers)on a chart from a set distance. LogMAR charts are used to assess visual acuity for research studies. LogMAR means Minimum Angle of Resolution. This has lead to the assertion that research is done using a logarithmic progression in size of letters on a test chart gives the most accurate visual acuity measurement. The reason for this is, unlike other charts, LogMAR chart has equal gradation between the letters on the line and the space between the lines. And, there is a fixed number of letters per line. |
Time Frame | After 5 to 9 days of lens wear |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully complete the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens) | Nelfilcon A Toric Lens (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Etafilcon A toric is a daily disposable hydrogel toric lens with the addition of a wetting agent, developed for a wider ranged of prescriptions; worn for 5-9 days | An existing, daily disposable toric contact lens; worn 5-9 days |
Measure Participants | 67 | 67 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [LogMAR] |
-0.122
(0.0718)
|
-0.108
(0.0766)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens), Nelfilcon A Toric (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Ho:The test lens is non-inferior to the active comparator lens for Binocular visual performance on logMAR scale at 1-week follow-up. A non-inferiority margin of 0.05 logMAR was used. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | Based on historical data, a minimum of 42 subjects is needed to achieve a minimum of 80% power with 0.05 type I error. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least-square mean difference |
Estimated Value | -0.015 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.027 to -0.003 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.0062 |
|
Estimation Comments | Comparison between study lenses was carried out using 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the least-square mean difference (test minus control). The non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the confidence limit is below 0.05 LogMAR. |
Title | Subject Reported Overall Lens Comfort Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation (CLUE)TM Questionnaire |
---|---|
Description | The Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3*SD). |
Time Frame | After 5 to 9 days of lens wear |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully complete the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A (Test Lens) | Nelfilcon A (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Etafilcon A toric is a daily disposable hydrogel toric lens with the addition of a wetting agent, developed for a wider ranged of prescriptions; worn 5-9 days | An existing, daily disposable toric contact lens; worn for 5-9 days |
Measure Participants | 67 | 67 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
56.4
(9.12)
|
44.0
(9.34)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens), Nelfilcon A Toric (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Ho:The test lens is non-inferior to the active comparator lens for comfort at 1-week follow-up. A non-inferiority margin of -5 units was used. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | Based on historical data, a minimum of 42 subjects is needed to achieve a minimum of 80% power with 0.05 type I error. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least-square mean difference |
Estimated Value | 11.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 4.05 to 19.79 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 3.93 |
|
Estimation Comments | Comparison between study lenses was carried out using 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the least-square mean difference (test minus control). The non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the confidence interval is higher than -5. |
Title | Subject Reported Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM Questionnaire. |
---|---|
Description | The Contact Lens User Evaluation(CLUE)TM questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3*SD). |
Time Frame | After 5 to 9 days of lens wear |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully complete the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A (Test Lens) | Nelfilcon A (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Etafilcon A toric is a daily disposable hydrogel toric lens with the addition of a wetting agent, developed for a wider ranged of prescriptions; worn for 5-9 days | An existing, daily disposable toric contact lens; worn for 5-9 days. |
Measure Participants | 67 | 67 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
52.7
(8.64)
|
44.7
(9.41)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etafilcon A Toric (Test Lens), Nelfilcon A Toric (Active Comparator) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Ho:The test lens is non-inferior to the active comparator lens for overall quality of vision at 1-week follow-up. A non-inferiority margin of -5 units was used. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | Based on historical data, a minimum of 42 subjects is needed to achieve a minimum of 80% power with 0.05 type I error. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | least-square mean difference |
Estimated Value | 7.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.58 to 14.80 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 3.55 |
|
Estimation Comments | Comparison between study lenses was carried out using 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the least-square mean difference (test minus control). The non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the confidence interval is higher than -5. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Etafilcon A Toric / Nelfilcon A Toric | |
Arm/Group Description | etafilcon A toric contact lens worn daily during first period of a maximum of 9 days, nelfilcon A toric contact lens worn during second period of a maximum of 9 days | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Etafilcon A Toric / Nelfilcon A Toric | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Etafilcon A Toric / Nelfilcon A Toric | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/69 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Etafilcon A Toric / Nelfilcon A Toric | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/69 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Publications require agreement and written approval from Sponsor.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Ross Franklin |
---|---|
Organization | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care |
Phone | 1-904-443-1379 |
RFrankl1@its.jnj.com |
- CR-1476AG