Performance of Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses After at Least One Month Wearing Enfilcon A Toric Lenses
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, subject-masked, bilateral, daily wear, two-month dispensing study
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to determine if adapted contact lens wearers enfilcon A toric lenses can be confidently refit into fanfilcon A toric lenses and can be successful after one month of daily wear.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: enfilcon A (habitual) All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses. |
|
Active Comparator: fanfilcon A All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses. |
Device: fanfilcon A
contact lens
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visual Acuity [baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month]
High contrast distance visual acuity is measured by LogMAR.
- Centration [baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month]
Lens centration is assessed (optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable).
- Corneal Coverage [baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month]
Corneal coverage will be assessed (yes/no)
- Post-blink Movement [baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month]
Post-blink lens movement assessed using the following evaluations (0-4): 0=Insufficient, unacceptable, 1=Minimal, acceptable, 2=Optimal, 3=Moderate, acceptable, 4=Excessive, unacceptable)
- Fit Acceptability [baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month]
Investigator fit acceptability for each lens pair. Scale 0-4: (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
-
Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
-
Has had a self-reported eye exam in the last two years
-
Is a habitual soft toric lens wearer
-
Can be successfully fit with study lenses (≥ grade 2 fit acceptance)
-
Has a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to -6.00D with a cylinder between -0.75 and -1.75D (Diopters) (inclusive)
-
Has a spectacle cylinder of at least 0.75D in each eye.
-
Can achieve best corrected spectacle refraction distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
-
Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
-
Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
-
Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
-
Has a contact lens refraction that fits within the available parameters of the study lenses
-
Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so)
-
Is willing to comply with the visit schedule.
Exclusion Criteria:
A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
-
Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL (Contact Lens) wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
-
Presents with clinically significant anterior segment abnormalities
-
Presents with ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear
-
Presents with slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
-
Pathological dry eye or associated findings
-
Significant pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
-
Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
-
Anterior uveitis or iritis (or history in past year)
-
Seborrheic eczema of eyelid region, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
-
History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
-
Poor personal hygiene
-
Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
-
Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
-
Has presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
-
Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
-
Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
-
Is frequently using rewetting/ lubricating eye drops (more than once per day)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hospital Contact Lens Service | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 |
2 | Debbie Kim | Closter | New Jersey | United States | 07624 |
3 | West Village Eyecare | New York | New York | United States | 10014 |
4 | Spokane Eye Clinic | Spokane | Washington | United States | 99204 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Coopervision, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- EX-MKTG-67
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 37 participants were initially enrolled (assigned a study ID), with 1 failing the screening. A total of 36 participants wore the control lens (enfilcon A toric) first and then refitted and dispensed the test lenses (fanfilcon A toric) at baseline visit. There were no discontinuations. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants (Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wore enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then wore fanfilcon A toric lenses for 1 month. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 36 |
COMPLETED | 36 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Overall Participants | 36 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
29.4
(6.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
25
69.4%
|
Male |
11
30.6%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |
United States |
36
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Visual Acuity |
---|---|
Description | High contrast distance visual acuity is measured by LogMAR. |
Time Frame | baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was performed prior to one participant completing the 2 week and 1 month visits. |
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric (Baseline) | Fanfilcon A Toric (Dispense) | Fanfilcon A Toric (2 Weeks) | Fanfilcon A Toric (1 Month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Measure Participants | 36 | 36 | 35 | 35 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [logMAR] |
-0.05
(0.05)
|
-0.05
(0.05)
|
-0.05
(0.05)
|
-0.04
(0.04)
|
Title | Centration |
---|---|
Description | Lens centration is assessed (optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable). |
Time Frame | baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was performed prior to one participant completing the 2 week and 1 month visits. |
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric (Baseline) | Fanfilcon A Toric (Dispense) | Fanfilcon A Toric (2 Weeks) | Fanfilcon A Toric (1 Month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (for 1 month) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (for 1 month) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (for 1 month) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (for 1 month) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Measure Participants | 36 | 36 | 35 | 35 |
Optimum |
34
94.4%
|
35
NaN
|
30
NaN
|
33
NaN
|
Acceptable |
1
2.8%
|
1
NaN
|
5
NaN
|
2
NaN
|
Unacceptable |
1
2.8%
|
0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Corneal Coverage |
---|---|
Description | Corneal coverage will be assessed (yes/no) |
Time Frame | baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was performed prior to one participant completing the 2 week and 1 month visits. |
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric (Baseline) | Fanfilcon A Toric (Dispense) | Fanfilcon A Toric (2 Weeks) | Fanfilcon A Toric (1 Month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Measure Participants | 36 | 36 | 35 | 35 |
Yes |
36
100%
|
36
NaN
|
35
NaN
|
35
NaN
|
No |
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Post-blink Movement |
---|---|
Description | Post-blink lens movement assessed using the following evaluations (0-4): 0=Insufficient, unacceptable, 1=Minimal, acceptable, 2=Optimal, 3=Moderate, acceptable, 4=Excessive, unacceptable) |
Time Frame | baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was performed prior to one participant completing the 2 week and 1 month visits. |
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric (Baseline) | Fanfilcon A Toric (Dispense) | Fanfilcon A Toric (2 Weeks) | Fanfilcon A Toric (1 Month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Measure Participants | 36 | 36 | 35 | 35 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
1.83
(0.51)
|
1.92
(0.50)
|
1.69
(0.47)
|
1.86
(0.49)
|
Title | Fit Acceptability |
---|---|
Description | Investigator fit acceptability for each lens pair. Scale 0-4: (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect) |
Time Frame | baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was performed prior to one participant completing the 2 week and 1 month visits. |
Arm/Group Title | Enfilcon A Toric (Baseline) | Fanfilcon A Toric (Dispense) | Fanfilcon A Toric (2 Weeks) | Fanfilcon A Toric (1 Month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | All participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. |
Measure Participants | 36 | 36 | 35 | 35 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.3
(0.6)
|
3.3
(0.5)
|
3.1
(0.8)
|
3.1
(0.6)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data collected at all scheduled visits over a 1 month period of time | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | All Participants (Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses) | |
Arm/Group Description | All participants wore enfilcon A toric lenses (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses at baseline visit. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
All Participants (Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/36 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
All Participants (Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/36 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
All Participants (Enfilcon A Toric / Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/36 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor should be notified of any results communications and has ability to review.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Jose Vega, O.D., MSc., FAAO |
---|---|
Organization | CooperVision |
Phone | 9256213761 |
JVega2@coopervision.com |
- EX-MKTG-67