Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Subjects With Severe Atopic Dermatitis - ECZTRA 7
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Primary objective:
To demonstrate that tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) is superior to placebo in combination with TCS in treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral cyclosporine A (CSA).
Secondary objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in combination with TCS on severity and extent of AD, itch, and health-related quality of life compared to placebo in combination with TCS.
To evaluate the safety of tralokinumab in combination with TCS when treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral CSA compared to placebo in combination with TCS.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tralokinumab + TCS 4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of tralokinumab 150 mg as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of tralokinumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved. |
Drug: Tralokinumab
Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + TCS 4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved. |
Other: Placebo
Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16 [Week 0 to Week 16]
EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16 [Week 0 to Week 16]
Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
- Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16 [Week 0 to Week 16]
SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.
- Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16 [Week 0 to Week 16]
DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16 [Week 16]
IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
- At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26 [Week 0 to Week 26]
EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.
- Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26 [Week 0 to Week 26]
Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
- Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26 [Week 0 to Week 26]
SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.
- Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26 [Week 0 to Week 26]
DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26 [Week 26]
IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
- Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40 [Week 0 to Week 40]
Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment.
- Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40 [Week 0 to Week 40]
All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 and above
-
Diagnosis of AD as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka (1980) criteria for AD
-
History of AD for 1 year or more
-
Subjects with a history within 1 year prior to screening of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or subjects for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable
-
AD involvement of 10% (or more) body surface area at screening and baseline (visit 3) according to component A of SCORAD
-
Documented history of either no previous CSA exposure and not currently a candidate for CSA treatment OR previous exposure to CSA in which case CSA treatment should not be continued or restarted
-
Subjects must have applied a stable dose of emollient twice daily (or more, as needed) for at least 14 days before randomisation
Key Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects for whom TCSs are medically inadvisable in the opinion of the investigator
-
Use of tanning beds or phototherapy (NBUVB, UVB, UVA1, PUVA), within 6 weeks prior to randomisation
-
Treatment with immunomodulatory medications or bleach baths within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
-
Treatment with topical phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitor within 2 weeks prior to randomisation
-
Receipt of any marketed or investigational biologic agent (e.g. cell-depleting agents or dupilumab) within 6 months prior to randomisation or until cell counts return to normal, whichever is longer
-
History of any active skin infection within 1 week prior to randomisation
-
History of a clinically significant infection (systemic infection or serious skin infection requiring parenteral treatment) within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
-
A helminth parasitic infection within 6 months prior to the date informed consent is obtained that has not been treated with, or has failed to respond to, standard of care therapy
-
Tuberculosis requiring treatment within the 12 months prior to screening. Evaluation will be according to local guidelines as per local standard of care
-
History of any known primary immunodeficiency disorder including a positive HIV test at screening, or the subject taking antiretroviral medications
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Brussels | Belgium | 1090 | |
2 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Brussels | Belgium | 1200 | |
3 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Edegem | Belgium | 2650 | |
4 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Gent | Belgium | 9000 | |
5 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Gent | Belgium | B-9000 | |
6 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Herstal | Belgium | B-4040 | |
7 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kortrijk | Belgium | 8500 | |
8 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Leuven | Belgium | 3000 | |
9 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Liège | Belgium | 4000 | |
10 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Loverval | Belgium | 6280 | |
11 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Maldegem | Belgium | 9990 | |
12 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Karlovy Vary | Czechia | 36001 | |
13 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kutna Hora | Czechia | 284 01 | |
14 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Ostrava | Czechia | 70852 | |
15 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pardubice | Czechia | 53002 | |
16 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague 5 | Czechia | 15006 | |
17 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague 8 | Czechia | 180 81 | |
18 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | Czechia | 11000 | |
19 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | Czechia | 120 00 | |
20 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Praha 3 | Czechia | 130 00 | |
21 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Grenoble | France | 38000 | |
22 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Nice | France | 06202 | |
23 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Paris | France | 75010 | |
24 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pierre-Bénite | France | 69495 | |
25 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Valence | France | 26000 | |
26 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Aachen | Germany | 52074 | |
27 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Augsburg | Germany | 86150 | |
28 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bad Bentheim | Germany | 48455 | |
29 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Berlin | Germany | 10117, | |
30 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Dresden | Germany | 01307 | |
31 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Dülmen | Germany | 48249 | |
32 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Frankfurt | Germany | 60590 | |
33 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Halle | Germany | 06097 | |
34 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Hanover | Germany | 30159 | |
35 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Jena | Germany | 07743 | |
36 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kiel | Germany | 24105 | |
37 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Mainz | Germany | 55128 | |
38 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | München | Germany | 80337 | |
39 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Osnabrück | Germany | 49074 | |
40 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Selters | Germany | 56242 | |
41 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Białystok | Poland | 15-375 | |
42 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bochnia | Poland | 32-700 | |
43 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bydgoszcz | Poland | 85-094 | |
44 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Gdańsk | Poland | 80-546 | |
45 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kraków | Poland | 30-149 | |
46 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kraków | Poland | 31-530 | |
47 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kraków | Poland | 31-559 | |
48 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Lublin | Poland | 20-081 | |
49 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Poznań | Poland | 60-369 | |
50 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Rzeszów | Poland | 35-312 | |
51 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warszawa | Poland | 01-817 | |
52 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warszawa | Poland | 02-625 | |
53 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warszawa | Poland | 02-953 | |
54 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Wrocław | Poland | 51-685 | |
55 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Łódź | Poland | 90-242 | |
56 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Łódź | Poland | 90-752 | |
57 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Granada | Andalucía | Spain | 18014 |
58 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Alicante | Spain | 03010 | |
59 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08036 | |
60 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08041 | |
61 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08907 | |
62 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bilbao | Spain | 48013 | |
63 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Córdoba | Spain | 14004 | |
64 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | Spain | 28006 | |
65 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | Spain | 28046 | |
66 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | Spain | 28942 | |
67 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pamplona | Spain | 31008 | |
68 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Sevilla | Spain | 41007 | |
69 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bradford | United Kingdom | BD5 0NA | |
70 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Cottingham | United Kingdom | HU16 5JQ | |
71 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kirkcaldy | United Kingdom | KY2 5AH | |
72 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | London | United Kingdom | E11 1NR | |
73 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Southampton | United Kingdom | SO16 6YD | |
74 | Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Wakefield | United Kingdom | WF1 4DG |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Expert, LEO Pharma
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- LP0162-1346
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | After the participant gave informed consent, they went through a 2- to 6-week screening period. Eligibility was assessed at the (first) screening visit and on Day 0 (hereinafter "baseline") prior to randomisation. |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab + TCS | Placebo + TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 140 | 137 |
COMPLETED | 125 | 120 |
NOT COMPLETED | 15 | 17 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab + TCS | Placebo + TCS | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 140 | 137 | 277 |
Age (Years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Years] |
33.0
|
34.0
|
34.0
|
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
18-64 |
134
95.7%
|
131
95.6%
|
265
95.7%
|
65-84 |
6
4.3%
|
6
4.4%
|
12
4.3%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
58
41.4%
|
54
39.4%
|
112
40.4%
|
Male |
82
58.6%
|
83
60.6%
|
165
59.6%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
6
4.3%
|
4
2.9%
|
10
3.6%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
134
95.7%
|
133
97.1%
|
267
96.4%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.4%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
1
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.4%
|
White |
137
97.9%
|
135
98.5%
|
272
98.2%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
2
1.4%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
Belgium |
25
17.9%
|
27
19.7%
|
52
18.8%
|
Czechia |
14
10%
|
12
8.8%
|
26
9.4%
|
Poland |
34
24.3%
|
43
31.4%
|
77
27.8%
|
United Kingdom |
5
3.6%
|
9
6.6%
|
14
5.1%
|
France |
12
8.6%
|
7
5.1%
|
19
6.9%
|
Germany |
22
15.7%
|
18
13.1%
|
40
14.4%
|
Spain |
28
20%
|
21
15.3%
|
49
17.7%
|
Age at onset of atopic dermatitis (Years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Years] |
2.5
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
Duration of atopic dermatitis (Years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Years] |
26.0
|
25.0
|
26.0
|
Body surface area with atopic dermatitis (Percentage affected) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Percentage affected] |
52.0
|
52.0
|
52.0
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Count of Participants) | |||
Moderate Disease |
68
48.6%
|
70
51.1%
|
138
49.8%
|
Severe Disease |
70
50%
|
67
48.9%
|
137
49.5%
|
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (Units on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on a scale] |
28.60
|
29.10
|
28.80
|
Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (Units on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on a scale] |
69.20
|
68.90
|
69.10
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (Units on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on a scale] |
16.00
|
16.00
|
16.00
|
Worst Daily Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) (weekly average) (Units on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on a scale] |
7.43
|
7.50
|
7.43
|
Outcome Measures
Title | At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16 |
---|---|
Description | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 16 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). Of the 277 participants randomised to initial treatment, 275 were treated. Therefore, the FAS consisted of 275 participants (138 participants in the tralokinumab+TCS group + 137 participants in the placebo+TCS group). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0 followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 16. | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at Week 0 followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2 to Week 16. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
64.2
|
50.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.018 |
Comments | This endpoint was the first endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 14.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 2.5 to 25.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16 |
---|---|
Description | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 16 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the full analysis set with a Worst Daily Pruritus NRS (weekly average) of at least 4 at baseline (Week 0). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0 followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 16. | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at Week 0 followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2 to Week 16. |
Measure Participants | 134 | 135 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
45.5
|
35.6
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.106 |
Comments | This endpoint was the second endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 9.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.0 to 21.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16 |
---|---|
Description | SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 16 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0 followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 16. | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at Week 0 followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2 to Week 16. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale] |
-42.7
(1.6)
|
-34.1
(1.6)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Data collected after permanent discontinuation of IMP, after initiation of rescue treatment, or after subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic will not be included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | This was the third endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Repeated measurements model | |
Comments | Treatment effect at each visit adjusted for baseline SCORAD interacting with each visit, prior CSA, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference |
Estimated Value | -8.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -13.0 to -4.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16 |
---|---|
Description | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 16 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full Set Analysis (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0 followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 16. | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at Week 0 followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2 to Week 16. |
Measure Participants | 137 | 134 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale] |
-11.2
(0.4)
|
-9.6
(0.4)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Data collected after permanent discontinuation of IMP, after initiation of rescue treatment, or after subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic will not be included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.009 |
Comments | This was the fourth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Repeated measurements model | |
Comments | Treatment effect at each visit adjusted for baseline DLQI interacting with each visit, prior CSA, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference |
Estimated Value | -1.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.6 to -0.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16 |
---|---|
Description | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). |
Time Frame | Week 16 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0 followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 16. | Participants in the initial treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at Week 0 followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2 to Week 16. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
40.9
|
26.0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.005 |
Comments | This endpoint was the fifth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 15.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 4.8 to 26.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26 |
---|---|
Description | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 26 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab | Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
68.8
|
55.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.014 |
Comments | This endpoint was the sixth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 14.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 2.9 to 25.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26 |
---|---|
Description | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 26 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the full analysis set with a Worst Daily Pruritus NRS (weekly average) of at least 4 at baseline (Week 0). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Measure Participants | 134 | 135 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
47.2
|
39.7
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.228 |
Comments | This endpoint was the seventh endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | HaenszMantelel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 7.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.6 to 19.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26 |
---|---|
Description | SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 26 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab | Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale] |
-46.3
(1.5)
|
-37.3
(1.6)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Data collected after permanent discontinuation of IMP, after initiation of rescue treatment, or after subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic will not be included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | This endpoint was the eighth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Repeated measurements model | |
Comments | Unstructured covariance matrix. Adjusted for baseline SCORAD in interaction with each visit, prior CSA use, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference |
Estimated Value | -8.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -13.2 to -4.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26 |
---|---|
Description | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 26 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full Set Analysis (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab | Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Measure Participants | 137 | 134 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale] |
-11.5
(0.4)
|
-9.9
(0.4)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Data collected after permanent discontinuation of IMP, after initiation of rescue treatment, or after subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic will not be included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.005 |
Comments | This endpoint was the ninth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Repeated measurements model | |
Comments | Unstructured covariance matrix. Adjusted for baseline DLQI in interaction with each visit, prior CSA use, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference |
Estimated Value | -1.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.7 to -0.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26 |
---|---|
Description | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). |
Time Frame | Week 26 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS). |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Number [Percentage of responders] |
47.0
|
33.4
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tralokinumab+TCS, Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subjects who received rescue treatment or permanently discontinued IMP, without prior subject-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (SOC19), were considered non-responders after the relevant event occurred. Any data from subjects who had SOC19 as their first prior intercurrent event (ICE) were multiple imputed (MI) assuming missing at random (MAR) following start of SOC19. Data missing prior to any ICE were handled as non-response, except data missing due to the pandemic, which was MI assuming MAR. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.014 |
Comments | This endpoint was the tenth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance. | |
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments | Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference (RD) |
Estimated Value | 14.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 2.9 to 25.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40 |
---|---|
Description | Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment. |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 40 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Tralokinumab+TCS | Placebo+TCS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the entire trial period, including the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed, and the safety follow-up period (up to Week 40). | Participants in the entire trial period, including the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed, and the safety follow-up period (up to Week 40). |
Measure Participants | 138 | 137 |
Positive |
2
1.4%
|
3
2.2%
|
Negative |
134
95.7%
|
133
97.1%
|
Perishing |
1
0.7%
|
1
0.7%
|
No post-baseline ADA assessment |
1
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40 |
---|---|
Description | All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events |
Time Frame | Week 0 to Week 40 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26), safety follow-up period (Week 26 to Week 40). | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The analysis was conducted based on the safety analysis set which consisted of subjects exposed to at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP e.g., tralokinumab or placebo). In the category Other adverse events (AEs), all AEs will be reported in the safety follow-up period, whereas a frequency threshold at 2% AEs will apply for the treatment period, except that all AEs will be reported if also part of the safety follow-up period. | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS | ||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. For the treatment period, only AEs with a frequency above 2% will be reported. The exception is that AEs reported in the safety follow-up period will also be reported for the treatment period. The total AEs will represent all AEs reported in the treatment period. | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. For the treatment period, only AEs with a frequency above 2% will be reported. The exception is that AEs reported in the safety follow-up period will also be reported for the treatment period. The total AEs will represent all AEs reported in the treatment period. | Participants who spent any amount of time in the safety follow-up period, independently of the treatment(s) received before. No treatment was administered to the participants during the safety follow-up period. Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND). For the safety follow-up period, all AEs will be reported. | Participants who spent any amount of time in the safety follow-up period, independently of the treatment(s) received before. No treatment was administered to the participants during the safety follow-up period. Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND). For the safety follow-up period, all AEs will be reported. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/138 (0%) | 0/137 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/83 (0%) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/138 (0.7%) | 5/137 (3.6%) | 0/75 (0%) | 1/83 (1.2%) | ||||
Immune system disorders | ||||||||
Anaphylactic reaction | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Appendicitis | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Pyelonephritis | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||
Peripheral nerve injury | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Seizure | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||
Depressed mood | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Suicidal ideation | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Asthma | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||
Dermatitis atopic | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 107/138 (77.5%) | 108/137 (78.8%) | 4/75 (5.3%) | 6/83 (7.2%) | ||||
Eye disorders | ||||||||
Conjunctivitis allergic | 6/138 (4.3%) | 8 | 5/137 (3.6%) | 5 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Dry eye | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Diarrhoea | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 5/137 (3.6%) | 8 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Dyspepsia | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Diverticulum intestinal | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||||||||
Fatigue | 4/138 (2.9%) | 4 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Injection site pain | 4/138 (2.9%) | 5 | 1/137 (0.7%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Influenza like illness | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 1/75 (1.3%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Viral upper respiratory tract infection | 37/138 (26.8%) | 53 | 35/137 (25.5%) | 46 | 2/75 (2.7%) | 2 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 10/138 (7.2%) | 12 | 10/137 (7.3%) | 11 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Folliculitis | 6/138 (4.3%) | 6 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Conjunctivitis | 6/138 (4.3%) | 6 | 2/137 (1.5%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Oral herpes | 5/138 (3.6%) | 8 | 6/137 (4.4%) | 6 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Rhinitis | 5/138 (3.6%) | 6 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Gastroenteritis | 4/138 (2.9%) | 4 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Pharyngitis | 4/138 (2.9%) | 4 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Sinusitis | 3/138 (2.2%) | 4 | 5/137 (3.6%) | 5 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Influenza | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 4/137 (2.9%) | 4 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Bronchitis | 3/138 (2.2%) | 4 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Dermatitis infected | 2/138 (1.4%) | 2 | 5/137 (3.6%) | 10 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Nasopharyngitis | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 6/137 (4.4%) | 6 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Herpes simplex | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 4 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Tonsillitis | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary tract infection | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Lower respiratory tract infection | 0/138 (0%) | 2/137 (1.5%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | ||
Pyelonephritis | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||
Skin abrasion | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Back pain | 6/138 (4.3%) | 6 | 4/137 (2.9%) | 4 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Myalgia | 4/138 (2.9%) | 5 | 2/137 (1.5%) | 2 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Arthralgia | 2/138 (1.4%) | 2 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 1/75 (1.3%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal pain | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 4 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||
Basal cell carcinoma | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Headache | 21/138 (15.2%) | 25 | 13/137 (9.5%) | 18 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||
Renal cyst | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Asthma | 4/138 (2.9%) | 5 | 8/137 (5.8%) | 9 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Cough | 4/138 (2.9%) | 5 | 7/137 (5.1%) | 7 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Oropharyngeal pain | 1/138 (0.7%) | 1 | 8/137 (5.8%) | 8 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||
Dermatitis atopic | 7/138 (5.1%) | 11 | 16/137 (11.7%) | 26 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 2/83 (2.4%) | 2 |
Pruritus | 6/138 (4.3%) | 12 | 5/137 (3.6%) | 6 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Diffuse alopecia | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Alopecia areata | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 3/137 (2.2%) | 3 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Night sweats | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 0/137 (0%) | 0 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 |
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
Hypertension | 3/138 (2.2%) | 3 | 7/137 (5.1%) | 7 | 0/75 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Disclosure |
---|---|
Organization | LEO Pharma A/S |
Phone | 44 94 58 88 ext +45 |
disclosure@leo-pharma.com |
- LP0162-1346