MILAAC: The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Sponsor
Hungarian Institute of Cardiology (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04800913
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
61.8
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the present prospective, randomized single-centre study is to determine the utility of multimodal imaging in percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. The investigators are planning to examine the success rate, safety, operative burden and long-time outcome of the procedure after multimodal and standard preprocedural imaging. Multimodal procedural guidance and postoperative assessment is going to be used. The investigators aim to compare the sensitivity of different imaging techniques in detecting postoperative complications.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Multimodal imaging
  • Diagnostic Test: Standard imaging
N/A

Detailed Description

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an increasingly used non-pharmacologic strategy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have absolute or relative contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulant therapy, mainly due to previous major bleeding or high bleeding risk. As the candidates of the procedure are mainly aged and multimorbid, the reduction of procedural burden is of huge significance for them. More comprehensive data about the optimal imaging of LAAC may contribute in finding the most accurate and least invasive way to plan and guide the procedure and to follow up the patients.

The aim of the present prospective, randomized, single-centre study is to examine the potential advantages of preoperative multimodal imaging in percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. The investigators are going to assess the success rate, safety and long-term outcome of LAAC procedures, and determine the procedural burden (total radiation dose, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast amount) of the interventions after preprocedural multimodal (2D/3D transesophageal echocardiography /TOE/ and multidetector computed tomography /MDCT/) and standard (2D/3D TOE or MDCT) appendage characterization and device sizing. Multimodal procedural guidance (2D/3D TOE, fluoroscopy-angiography) and multimodal postprocedural imaging (2D/3D TOE, MDCT) is going to be used to reveal complications (peri-device leak, thrombus). The investigators are planning to compare the accuracy and additive value of different postoperative imaging techniques, and ascertain the additive value of echocardiographic contrast agents in detecting postoperative complications.

.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Prospective randomized one-centre trialProspective randomized one-centre trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 8, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Multimodal imaging

Preoperative 2D/3D TOE AND MDCT for appendage characterisation and sizing Operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography for guiding and checking the procedural events and success Postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT to assess the complications (peri-device leak, thrombus)

Diagnostic Test: Multimodal imaging
Preoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT, operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography, postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT

Experimental: Standard imaging

Preoperative 2D/3D TOE OR MDCT for appendage characterisation and sizing Operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography for guiding and checking the procedural events and success Postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT to assess the complications (peri-device leak, thrombus)

Diagnostic Test: Standard imaging
Preoperative 2D/3D TOE or MDCT, operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography, postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Total radiation dose [Periprocedural (1 month) interval]

    Total radiation dose of the patient resorbed during LAAC imaging and intervention (uGym2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Fluoroscopy time [during the procedure]

    during LAAC procedure (min)

  2. Procedure time [during the procedure]

    of LAAC procedure (min)

  3. Contrast media amount [during the procedure]

    used during LAAC procedure (ml)

  4. Rate of successful implantations [during the procedure]

    left atrial appendage occluder successfully deployed and released

  5. Rate of patients with adequate seal of closure device [6 weeks post-procedure]

    Adequate seal defined as no leak or residual leak< 5 mm established by postoperative TOE

  6. Rate of procedural complications [within 30 days post-procedure]

    Thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction, bleeding events, vascular complications, pericardial effusion, tamponade, infections, allergic reactions, renal insufficiency, device/air embolism, mortality

  7. Rate of clinical events [5 years post-procedure]

    Composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients, who have clinical indication to LAAC and are undergoing percutaneous LAAC procedure in Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center from 10.03.2021 to 31.12.2025

  • Age above 18 years

  • Informed consent

  • Legal capacity

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age under 18 years

  • Pregnancy

  • Incapacitation

  • Absence of consent

  • Esophageal stenosis or diverticulum

  • Active esophageal bleeding

  • CT-contrast agent allergy

  • Severe chronic kidney disease (GFR<15 ml/min/1,73 m2)

  • Appendage thrombus (mobile/with significant embolic risk)

  • Life expectancy shorter than 12 months

  • Active infection

  • Significant mitral valve stenosis

  • Mechanical heart valve

  • Open heart surgery is indicated

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hungarian Institute of Cardiology (Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center) Budapest Hungary 1096

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hungarian Institute of Cardiology

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anita Zadori, MD, PhD, 0036303837011, zadori.anita@kardio.hu

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Anita Zadori MD, PhD, cardiologist, Hungarian Institute of Cardiology (Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center), Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04800913
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MILAAC
First Posted:
Mar 16, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Nov 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by Anita Zadori MD, PhD, cardiologist, Hungarian Institute of Cardiology (Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center), Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 9, 2021