AFFELECT: Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively

Sponsor
Tampere University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04267159
Collaborator
(none)
500
4
2
111.7
125
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The AFFELECT -study compares two types of treatment modalities for acute atrial fibrillation or flutter for patients in whom rhythm control is desirable. The main purpose is to observe if these arrhythmias can be safely treated electively (within 5-9 days).

All patients are recruited in the emergency department. Patients must be in good clinical condition so that they can be discharged regardless to which treatment modality is randomly selected to them. Patients randomized to conventional care are treated conventionally which means acute rhythm control is applied by electrical or medical cardioversion in the emergency department (within 48 hours of onset of the arrhythmia). Patients randomized to elective care are discharged immediately after adequate temporary rhythm control is assured.

All patients will visit a cardiologist out-patient clinic at approximately one week after the emergency room visit. Patients randomized to elective treatment and still in atrial fibrillation or in atrial flutter will be restored to sinus rhythm by electrical or medical cardioversion at the out-patient clinic. Cardiovascular status and treatment options are evaluated for all patients.

Anticoagulation is managed according existing guidelines for all patients. Due to possibility of delayed cardioversion in the interventional group (elective care group), all patients receive anticoagulation before the out-patient clinic despite their thromboembolic risk. All patients who have not received adequate anticoagulation for three weeks prior to the delayed cardioversion will undergo a transesophageal cardiac ultrasound to ensure they are not in excess risk for thromboembolic events. Patients randomized to elective treatment have the possibility to opt-out and undergo acute cardioversion if their symptoms are unmanageable during the first week before the out-patient clinical.

All patients are monitored for their symptoms by a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire and for possibly required acute medical interventions during the first week and one month after the out-patient clinic. After one month, all patients undergo an electrocardiography (ECG) to ensure the maintenance of normal rhythm in both treatment groups. After the months follow-up all patients are subsequently monitored for a maximum of five years for need of medical interventions due to atrial fibrillation of atrial flutter. New antiarrhythmics such as flecainide are not prescribed during the first month.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Acute cardioversion
  • Other: Delayed cardioversion
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
500 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The AFFECT trial is a randomized clinical trial with a non-inferioirity setting studying the applicability of delayed rhythm control in the management of acute paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or flutter. Patients are randomized to two treatment protocols in 2:3 ratio. For every two patients randomized to conventional treatment, three patients are randomized to experimental treatment. The randomization ratio is designed to allow for maximally one third of the patients in the experimental treatment group to drop-out without compromising the power of the study. Overall five hundred patients are required to show non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha value 0.025 and 90% power expecting a maximal drop out rate of 33% (n=100) from the experimental treatment arm.The AFFECT trial is a randomized clinical trial with a non-inferioirity setting studying the applicability of delayed rhythm control in the management of acute paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or flutter. Patients are randomized to two treatment protocols in 2:3 ratio. For every two patients randomized to conventional treatment, three patients are randomized to experimental treatment. The randomization ratio is designed to allow for maximally one third of the patients in the experimental treatment group to drop-out without compromising the power of the study. Overall five hundred patients are required to show non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha value 0.025 and 90% power expecting a maximal drop out rate of 33% (n=100) from the experimental treatment arm.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety of Elective Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 10, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2029

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment by acute cardioversion

Participants in the conventional treatment arm will be returned to sinus rhythm in the emergency department within 48 hours of symptom onset unless they convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously.

Other: Acute cardioversion
Acute restoration of sinus rhythm by medical or electrical cardioversion in the emergency department

Experimental: Elective treatment by delayed cardioversion

Participants in the elective treatment arm will be returned to sinus rhythm in an out-patient clinic approximately one week after randomizatio unless they convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously.

Other: Delayed cardioversion
Delayed restoration of sinus rhythm by medical or electrical cardioversion in the out-patient clinic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Sinus Rhythm [One month after preplanned out-patient clinic visit]

    Prevalence of sinus rhythm in the treatment arms measured by electrocardiography

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Immediate quality of life [First week after randomization and before the preplanned out-patient clinic]

    Quality of life as assessed by Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire (AFEQT). Scale 20-140 with higher score indicating worse quality-of-life.

  2. Quality of life after out-patient clinic [One month after out-patient clinic]

    Quality of life as assessed by Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire (AFEQT). Scale 20-140 with higher score indicating worse quality-of-life.

  3. Number of cardioversions after emergency department [First week after randomization and before the preplanned out-patient clinic]

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

  4. Number of cardioversions after out-patient clinic [One month after out-patient clinic]

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

  5. Overall number of cardioversions [From randomization to the end of first month follow-up after out-patient clinic visit]

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

  6. Drop-out from delayed cardioversion group [Four days or earlier after randomization to elective (delayed) treatment group]

    The number of subjects needing unplanned cardioversion before preplanned out-patient clinic visit (four days or earlier after randomization) due to medical reasons or due to subjectively perceived unbearable symptoms (EHRA III or IV).

  7. Rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes [One week before and one month after out-patient clinic visit]

    Rehospitalization due to any cardiovascular cause

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients presenting with acute (<48hours) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter to ER

  • Planned acute rhythm control for the arrhythmia by the attending physician in ER

  • Good perceived health as assessed by attending physician in ER

  • Resting heart rate 110bpm or lower before or after adequate rate control therapy

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Haemodynamically stable (mean arterial pressure above 60mmHg)

  • Need for acute restoration of sinus rhythm due to some other somatic cause

  • No other major complicating acute illness (e.g. decompensated HF or acute MI)

  • Anticoagulation not safe

  • Mechanical heart valve or mitral stenosis

  • The need for prolonged (>24h) hospitalization due to any cause

  • Exceptionally high risk for thromboembolic events (e.g. history of thromboembolic stroke regardless of adequate anticoagulation)

  • Transesophageal echocardiography contraindicated

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Central Finland Central Hospital Jyväskylä Central Finland Finland
2 Kanta-Häme Central Hospital Hämeenlinna Kanta-Häme Finland
3 Tampere University Hospital Tampere Pirkanmaa Finland 03220
4 Päijät-Häme Central Hospital Lahti Päijät-Häme Finland

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Tampere University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jussi A Hernesniemi, MD, PhD, TAYS Heart Hospital and Tampere University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jussi Hernesniemi, Adjunct Professor, Tampere University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04267159
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ETL R19133
First Posted:
Feb 12, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Apr 28, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 28, 2021