MOBILE-AF: Mobile Phones in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Bringing Single Lead ECGs to Detect Atrial Fibrillation

Sponsor
Leiden University (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02507986
Collaborator
Medical Center Haaglanden (Other), Groene Hart Ziekenhuis (Other), Herning Hospital (Other), Alrijne Hospital (Other), Reinier de Graaf Groep (Other)
57
7
2
65.2
8.1
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the incidence of detected atrial fibrillation (AF) in cryptogenic stroke patients by a single lead ECG device with the incidence of detected AF by a 7-Day Holter ECG.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Single lead ECG device
  • Device: 7-Day Holter monitor.
N/A

Detailed Description

Rationale: A standard work-up of stroke patients to identify a cause of stroke consists of Computed Tomography (CT), CT angiography of head and neck arteries, transthoracic echocardiography, 12-lead 10-seconds electrocardiogram (ECG), blood tests and 24-hour ECG monitoring. A stroke is called "cryptogenic" if no cause can be determined after standard work-up. Current detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) after stroke is 2.0%. Recent studies revealed that prolonged monitoring yields higher percentages of detected AF (12.0%). Devices used in these trials suffer from drawbacks. The investigators' hypothesis is that a new, smartphone compatible device, producing a single lead ECG (single lead ECG device), can be used for prolonged ECG monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients.

Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the incidence of detected AF in cryptogenic stroke patients by a single lead ECG device with the incidence of detected AF by a 7-Day Holter ECG.

Study design: A multicenter randomized trial. Study population: Cryptogenic stroke patients admitted to a hospital participating in the study. The calculated sample size is 200 (100 per arm).

Intervention: After inclusion, patients will be randomized to either a single lead ECG device or a 7-Day Holter Monitor.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main endpoint will be the percentage of detected atrial fibrillation in both the single lead ECG device group and the 7-Day Holter group after one year.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Both devices are battery powered and electrically safe. Patients face a 2-3% risk that AF is detected false-positively; this might lead to incorrect oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription. However, a potential benefit of the investigators' study is that if AF is detected and treated with OAC, this significantly reduces the chance of recurrent stroke.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
57 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Mobile Phones in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Bringing Single Lead ECGs to Detect Atrial Fibrillation
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 29, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 4, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 4, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 7-Day Holter monitor

This arm will receive a 7-Day Holter monitor directly after randomization.

Device: 7-Day Holter monitor.
The Holter is a conventional 7-Day Holter monitor.

Experimental: Single lead ECG device

This arm will be asked to take a single lead ECG two times per day and in case of complaints with a single lead ECG device.

Device: Single lead ECG device
The single lead ECG device is a smartphone compatible handheld device that produces a single lead ECG after 30 seconds of measurement. It is non-invasive, electrically safe and easy to use.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of detected atrial fibrillation [1 year of follow-up]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) levels in pg/mL [24 hours after cryptogenic stroke]

  2. Percentages of atrial ectopy detected on 7-Day Holter monitor [7 days after cryptogenic stroke]

  3. Left atrial diameter in cm/m2 [24 hours after cryptogenic stroke]

  4. Number of participants with a recurrent stroke or TIA as defined in the trial [Within one year after cryptogenic stroke]

  5. Number of participants with a major bleeding [Within one year after cryptogenic stroke]

  6. Left atrial volume in mL/m2 [24 hours after cryptogenic stroke]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients must have had an episode of symptomatic Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or episode of ischemic stroke.

  • Ischemic stroke is defined as an episode of transient or neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain or retinal ischemia with recent infarction on imaging

  • A TIA is defined as transient episode of neurologic dysfunction typically lasting less than one hour caused by focal brain or retinal ischemia without recent infarction on imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known etiology of TIA or ischemic stroke

  • TIA or stroke caused by spinal ischemia

  • TIA only presenting with non-localising symptoms

  • Uncertainty about the diagnosis of TIA because of unclear clinical symptoms

  • Myocardial infarction <6 months before stroke

  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting <6 months before stroke

  • Severe valvular heart disease

  • Documented history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

  • Permanent indication for oral anticoagulation at enrolment

  • Patient has permanent OAC contraindication

  • Patient is included in another randomized trial

  • Left ventricular aneurysm on echocardiography

  • Thrombus on echocardiographyRenal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73m2)

  • Patient has life expectancy of <1 year

  • Patient is not willing to sign the informed consent form

  • Patient is <18 years of age

  • Patient is considered an incapacitated adult

  • Patient is not in possession of a smartphone with Android Operating System (OS) or iOS.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Regionshospitalet Midtjylland Herning Denmark 7400
2 Reinier de Graaf Hospital Delft Zuid-Holland Netherlands
3 Medisch Centrum Haaglanden Den Haag Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2512 VA
4 Bronovo ziekenhuis Den Haag Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2597 AX
5 Groene Hart Ziekenhuis Gouda Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2803 HH
6 Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2333 ZA
7 Alrijne Hospital Leiderdorp Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2353 GA

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Leiden University
  • Medical Center Haaglanden
  • Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
  • Herning Hospital
  • Alrijne Hospital
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Serge Trines, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Serge A. Trines, S.A.I.P. Trines, Senior Cardiologist, Leiden University Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02507986
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MOBILE-AF
First Posted:
Jul 24, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Aug 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 18, 2022