COnventional vs. Optimised PERiprocedural Analgosedation vs. Total IntraVEnous Anaesthesia for Pulsed-Field Ablation (COOPERATIVE-PFA)

Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06013345
Collaborator
(none)
126
3
16

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A prospective single blinded (subject blinded) 1:1:1 randomised control trial with three parallel arms testing superiority of analgosedation regimen based on remimazolam and total intravenous anesthesia over propofol based analgosedation. The primary composite endpoint consists of hypoxaemia, hypotension, or hypertension requiring intervention.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
126 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Study arms, analgosedation and TIVA protocols: Conventional propofol analgosedation (arm P): current standard practice in most centres, a combination of short-acting benzodiazepine (midazolam) at the beginning, short-acting opioid (sufentanil in this study) and propofol boluses before and during the application of ablation pulses with unsecured airway Optimised continuous intravenous analgosedation (arm R): ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine (remimazolam) and ketamine with unsecured airway Total intravenous anaesthesia with secured airway (arm TIVA): continuous propofol infusion using target controlled infusion (TCI) and short acting opioid boluses - sufentanilStudy arms, analgosedation and TIVA protocols:Conventional propofol analgosedation (arm P): current standard practice in most centres, a combination of short-acting benzodiazepine (midazolam) at the beginning, short-acting opioid (sufentanil in this study) and propofol boluses before and during the application of ablation pulses with unsecured airway Optimised continuous intravenous analgosedation (arm R): ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine (remimazolam) and ketamine with unsecured airway Total intravenous anaesthesia with secured airway (arm TIVA): continuous propofol infusion using target controlled infusion (TCI) and short acting opioid boluses - sufentanil
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Conventional vs. Optimised Periprocedural Analgosedation vs. Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Pulsed-field Ablation: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm P

Patients in arm P will be administered 2-3 mg midazolam i.v. before the beginning of the procedure, 5-10 mcg sufentanil i.v. and a loading dose of propofol 0,8-1,0 mg/kg in 2-5 minutes before the start of the ablation phase. During the procedure, boluses of 0,5 mg/kg propofol will be repeated as needed, in case of inappropriate analgosedation, boluses of midazolam and/or sufentanil can be repeated.

Drug: Propofol
analgosedation with secured airway

Experimental: Arm R

Patients in arm R will be administered 2,5 mg loading dose of remimazolam followed by continuous infusion at 0,5 mg/h/kg of ideal body weight (IBW, calculated using the Miller formula) and a dose of ketamine 1 mg/kg (ideal body weight) 2-5 minutes before the beginning of the ablation phase. In case of inadequate sedation depth, a bolus of 2,5 mg remimazolam can be repeated as needed. In case the patient shows signs of pain or discomfort, a single dose of ketamine - 0,5 mg/kg IBW - will be administered, followed by a bolus of 5-10 mcg sufentanil if needed. The infusion will be stopped as the last ablation pulses are delivered

Drug: Remimazolam
analgosedation without secured airway

Experimental: Arm TIVA (Total Intravenous Anesthesia)

General anaesthesia in patients randomised in arm TIVA will be induced and maintained with a bolus of 10 mcg sufentanil and propofol dosed by TCI system, model Schneider (plasma effect setting). The target plasma concentration for propofol will be set at 5-8 mcg/ml at induction and 4-6 mcg/ml for the rest of the procedure. After the induction, a laryngeal mask (LMA) will be inserted, the patient will be ventilated with 0,3 - 0,4 fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), minute ventilation set to achieve end tidal CO2 30 - 40 mmHg. At the beginning of the ablation phase, one bolus of 5-10 mcg sufentanil can be repeated. The dosage of TIVA can be changed so that no sign of discomfort is observed in the patient during ablation pulses. After the last ablation pulse is delivered, infusion of propofol will be ceased and LMA extracted at the return of consciousness.

Drug: Propofol
TIVA with secured airway

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Primary composite endpoint (rate of hypoxaemia, hypotension, or hypertension events) [Procedure duration]

    Composite endpoint consisting of the rate of (1) hypoxaemia events requiring intervention, (2) hypotension events requiring intervention or leading to the procedure interruption, or (3) hypertension events requiring intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Total number of haemodynamic instability events (hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension; defined above), each five minutes of a continuous instability counts as a new event, as well as an instability persisting despite an intervention [Procedure duration]

  2. Total number of: a) hypoxemia events hypoxaemia <85% (more than 30s) b) hypotension events = systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 85 mmHg (more than 30s) c) hypertension event = SBP > 200 mmHg (more than 30s) [Procedure duration]

  3. Total number of interventions a) jaw thrust b) nasopharyngeal airway administration c) LMA / orotracheal intubation d) increasing FiO2 (oxygen flow) e) hypotensive drugs administration f) vasoactive drugs administration (ephedrine, noradrenaline) [Procedure duration]

  4. Total procedural time [Procedure duration]

  5. Analgosedation depth by bispectral (BIS) monitoring: area under the curve of BIS index (measured every 3 minutes during the procedure) [Procedure duration]

  6. Procedural sedation quality [12-24 hours after the procedure]

    PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey - a previously validated form

  7. Difficult sedation score [Procedure duration]

    1-10 scale (10 = the worst), reported by an anaesthesiologist

  8. Operator's satisfaction score [Procedure duration]

    1-10 scale (10 = the worst), reported by the operating physician

  9. Total number of serious adverse events [From randomization until discharge]

    death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (chest compression or adrenaline administration), an emergency intubation or prolonged stay in intensive care unit

  10. carbon dioxide partial pressure after the procedure [blood sample taken after the procedure (up to 10 minutes)]

    partial pressure (kPa) of CO2 measured in an arterial blood sample

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) (paroxysmal, persistent or long standing persistent) with indication for catheter ablation

  • Age above 18 years

  • Capacity to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Heart failure (NYHA III-IV), irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%

  • Significant valvulopathy (moderate or severe aortic stenosis, severe mitral regurgitation, severe aortic regurgitation, moderate and severe mitral stenosis)

  • Tricuspid regurgitation velocity above 2.8m/s

  • Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

  • Low oxygen saturation (<93%) at baseline

  • High aspiration risk (hiatal hernia, gastroesophageal reflux disease on chronic pharmacotherapy)

  • Hypersensitivity to the study drugs

  • Chronic kidney disease (stage 4 and 5 of CKD), liver cirrhosis

  • Anticipated difficult airways

  • ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score > 4

  • Schizophrenia

  • Epilepsy

  • Other individual contraindications (will be reported in detail)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Charles University, Czech Republic

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marek Hozman, Principal investigator, Charles University, Czech Republic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06013345
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Coopertaive-PFA
First Posted:
Aug 28, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 28, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Marek Hozman, Principal investigator, Charles University, Czech Republic
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 28, 2023