Does VoltagE Guided Additional Ablation Improve Procedural Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation?

Sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT03377751
Collaborator
(none)
20
3
3
21.9
6.7
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is designed to investigate whether pulmonary vein isolation(PVI) plus stepwise additional ablation approach based on the degree of low voltage area versus PVI only can improve procedure outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation(AF) patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Additional posterior wall isolation
  • Procedure: Voltage-guided substrate homogenization
  • Procedure: PVI only group
N/A

Detailed Description

Catheter ablation of AF is well accepted and widely performing treatment method of AF at present. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) which aims to electrical isolation of pulmonary veins is currently the standard therapy for AF. But some researchers proposed additional ablation strategy for persistent AF (PeAF) because abnormal atrial substrate may play a role in these patients.

However, there are inconsistent reports regarding a success rate of additional catheter ablation methods other than PVI. Thus, there still is no consensus on which strategy is appropriate in addition to PVI. One of these proposed options is complex fractioned atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation. A meta-analysis of controlled trials comparing PVI alone versus PVI with CFAE reported that the addition of CFAE ablation results in a statistically significant increase in success rate for PeAF patients. Conversely, a prospective multicenter trial, The Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR-AF II) trial showed that recurrence rate of AF following catheter ablation treatment was not significantly reduced when either linear ablation or ablation of CFAE was performed in addition to PVI. The investigators have previously reported that posterior wall isolation in addition to PVI plus linear lesions reduced recurrence of AF following catheter ablation compared to PVI only but the long-term success rate were markedly lower in the CFAE-guide ablation in addition PVI plus linear lesions group than in PVI plus linear lesions group among PeAF patients. Although benefit of addition CFAE could be originated from modification of abnormal atrial substrate which is generated by structural and electrical remodeling, this possible benefit could be counterbalanced by increased formation of transmural ablation scar which may result in dysfunction of left atrium and recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. A recent study have showed that extent of myocardial injury by catheter ablation was associated with left atrium functional deterioration in patients with paroxysmal AF and myocardial damage provoked that may contribute to recurrence of AF following catheter ablation.

Therefore, identification of PeAF patients who would benefit from additional ablation and tailored stepwise approach based on the identification may lead to reduction of iatrogenic myocardial injury and optimization of the result for the AF catheter ablation.

Recent data have shown that voltage guided mapping of left atrium is a powerful predictor of AF recurrence after PAI and voltage based ablation strategy showed promising result in terms of tailored approach. But, prospective, randomized clinical studies are needed to compare the result of a voltage-based AF ablation to the result of established strategies.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Does VoltagE Guided Additional Ablation Improve Procedural Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation? (The VEGA-AF Study)
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 15, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 15, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 15, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Additional posterior wall isolation

Operator will perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and additional posterior wall isolation if low voltage area exists more than 10% of the left atrium

Procedure: Additional posterior wall isolation
PVI and additional posterior wall isolation will be performed according to the following protocol which is based on low voltage area. Proportion of low voltage area to area of left atrium body <10% : PVI only Proportion of low voltage area to area of left atrium body ≥10% : PVI + Posterior wall isolation Low voltage area will be measured from more than 1000 points of sampled voltage value during sinus rhythm using PentaRay catheter with 3D mapping system of CARTO (Biosense Webster, CA, USA).

Experimental: Voltage-guided substrate homogenization

Operator will perform pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVI) and additional substrate modification based on the degree of low voltage area.

Procedure: Voltage-guided substrate homogenization
PVI and additional substrate modification at low voltage areas will be performed according to the following protocol which is based on low voltage area. Proportion of low voltage area to area of left atrium body <10% : PVI only Proportion of low voltage area to area of left atrium body ≥10% : PVI + substrate homogenization at low voltage areas Low voltage area will be measured from more than 1000 points of sampled voltage value during sinus rhythm using PentaRay catheter with 3D mapping system of CARTO (Biosense Webster, CA, USA).

Active Comparator: PVI only group

Operator will perform PVI only

Procedure: PVI only group
PVI will be performed in this arm.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Freedom rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia during 1 year after ablation procedure [Within 1 year after the ablation procedure]

    Any recurrence of ECG or Holter documented atrial tachyarrhythmia* * Sustained AF or atrial tachycardia >30 s duration.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Procedure related complication rate [during procedure and follow-up period(up to 1 year)]

    any adverse events

  2. Total procedural time [During procedure]

    total cumulative amount of radiation exposure

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF.

  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who have previously undergone AF ablation

  • Patients with more than mild mitral valve stenosis or mechanical mitral valve replacement

  • Patients with chronic renal impairment with creatinine clearance rate of <30 mL/min

  • Patients who are pregnant

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Korea University Guro Hospital Seoul Guro-gu Korea, Republic of 08308
2 Korea University Anam Hospital Seoul Seongbuk-gu Korea, Republic of 02841
3 Bucheon Sejong Hospital Bucheon Korea, Republic of 14754

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Korea University Guro Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hong Euy Lim, MD, Ph.D., Professor

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Hong Euy Lim, MD, Professor, Korea University Guro Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03377751
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KUGH17287 (VEGA-AF)
First Posted:
Dec 19, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Sep 9, 2020
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Hong Euy Lim, MD, Professor, Korea University Guro Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 9, 2020