Electrocardiogram Clinical Validation Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to confirm the software's ability to create a Lead-1 electrocardiogram (ECG) that is clinically equivalent to a reference device. Also, to confirm a rhythm classification algorithm and its ability to detect and classify heart rhythms into two categories (Sinus Rhythm or Atrial Fibrillation) using a single Lead ECG.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Atrial fibrillation (AF) Patient with a known history of AF who are in AF at the time of study screening. |
Other: 1-Lead ECG
All participants will record three single-lead ECGs
Device: 12-Lead ECG
All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs
|
Other: Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia |
Other: 1-Lead ECG
All participants will record three single-lead ECGs
Device: 12-Lead ECG
All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Software's Rhythm Classification of SR in Agreement to a Physician's Interpretation of a Gold Standard 12-lead ECG [1 Day]
Specificity of rhythm classification
- Number of Participants With Software's Rhythm Classification of AF in Agreement to a Physician's Interpretation of a Gold Standard 12-lead ECG [1 Day]
Sensitivity of rhythm classification
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Software's Ability to Produce a Clinically Equivalent Waveform in Agreement to a Gold Standard Lead 1 Reference [1 Day]
Number of ECGs that pass a visual overlay
- Number of Participants With Software's Ability to Produce a Clinically Equivalent Waveform in Agreement to a Gold Standard Lead 1 Reference [1 Day]
Difference in R-wave amplitudes between the software and gold standard reference
- Ease of Use [1 Day]
Average ease of use on a 1 (Unable to Use) to 5 (Easiest to Use) scale
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Individuals who are 22 years of age and older
-
Able to read, understand, and provide written informed consent
-
Willing and able to participate in the study procedures as described in the consent
-
Have a wrist circumference that fits within the band
-
Able to communicate effectively with and follow instructions from the study staff
-
For subjects enrolled into the AF population, subjects must have a known diagnosis of AF and be in AF at the time of screening
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Physical disability that precludes safe and adequate testing
-
Mental impairment resulting in limited ability to cooperate
-
Subjects with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
-
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 90 days of screening or other cardiovascular disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, increases the risk to the subject or renders data uninterpretable
-
Acute pulmonary embolism, pulmonary infarction, or deep vein thrombosis within 90 days of screening
-
Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days of screening
-
Subjects taking rhythm control drugs
-
Symptomatic (or active) allergic skin reactions such as eczema, rosacea, impetigo, dermatomyositis or allergic contact dermatitis on both wrists or over electrode attachment sites
-
Known sensitivity to medical adhesives, isopropyl alcohol, watch bands, or electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes including known allergy or sensitivity to fluoroelastomer bands primarily used in wrist worn fitness devices
-
A history of abnormal life-threatening rhythms as determined by the investigator
-
Significant tremor that prevents subject from being able to hold still
-
Pregnant women: Women who are pregnant at the time of study participation
-
For subjects enrolled into the sinus rhythm population, they must not have any diagnosis of AF
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | QPS | Miami | Florida | United States | 33143 |
2 | BioClinicia- Orlando | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
3 | BioClinica- The Villages | The Villages | Florida | United States | 32162 |
4 | IQVIA | Overland Park | Kansas | United States | 66211 |
5 | Health East | Saint Paul | Minnesota | United States | 55102 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Apple Inc.
- Iqvia Pty Ltd
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 099-11774
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 301 | 301 |
COMPLETED | 301 | 287 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 14 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 301 | 287 | 588 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
73.8
(8.62)
|
59.5
(17.73)
|
66.9
(15.47)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
92
30.6%
|
159
55.4%
|
251
42.7%
|
Male |
209
69.4%
|
128
44.6%
|
337
57.3%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Ethnicity : Hispanic or Latino |
19
6.3%
|
57
19.9%
|
76
12.9%
|
Ethnicity : Not Hispanic or Latino |
282
93.7%
|
230
80.1%
|
512
87.1%
|
Race: American Indian or Alaska Native |
2
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.3%
|
Race: Asian |
1
0.3%
|
2
0.7%
|
3
0.5%
|
Race: Black or African American |
8
2.7%
|
46
16%
|
54
9.2%
|
Race: Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders |
0
0%
|
1
0.3%
|
1
0.2%
|
Race: White |
292
97%
|
236
82.2%
|
528
89.8%
|
Race: Not Reported |
0
0%
|
3
1%
|
3
0.5%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
United States |
301
100%
|
287
100%
|
588
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Software's Rhythm Classification of SR in Agreement to a Physician's Interpretation of a Gold Standard 12-lead ECG |
---|---|
Description | Specificity of rhythm classification |
Time Frame | 1 Day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Classifiable Analysis Set: All subjects who had readable/classifiable paired Software and Reference strips were used. This analysis set was used for analyzing the primary endpoints of sensitivity and specificity. |
Arm/Group Title | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Measure Participants | 239 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
238
79.1%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Comments | H0: Specificity = 92% H1: Specificity > 92 Under the assumption that the true population specificity is 96.5%, 226 subjects who were diagnosed with SR based on the 12-lead ECG reference strip and where the device algorithm classification produced a result of AF or SR was calculated to provide at least 80% power to reject its null hypothesis, using a one-sided type I error of 0.025. To obtain readable waveforms approximately 300 subjects with no known diagnosis of AF were enrolled. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | 1 sided exact binomial test | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Software's Rhythm Classification of AF in Agreement to a Physician's Interpretation of a Gold Standard 12-lead ECG |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity of rhythm classification |
Time Frame | 1 Day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Classifiable Analysis Set: All subjects who had readable/classifiable paired Software and Reference strips were used. This analysis set was used for analyzing the primary endpoints of sensitivity and specificity. |
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Measure Participants | 240 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
236
78.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Comments | H0: Sensitivity = 90% H1: Sensitivity > 90% Under the assumption that the true population sensitivity is 95%, 231 subjects who were diagnosed with AF based on the 12-lead ECG reference strip and where the device algorithm classification produced a result of AF or SR was calculated to provide at least 80% power to reject the null hypothesis, using a one-sided type I error of 0.025. To obtain readable waveforms, a minimum of 260 subjects with a known diagnosis of AF were enrolled. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | 1 sided exact binomial test | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Software's Ability to Produce a Clinically Equivalent Waveform in Agreement to a Gold Standard Lead 1 Reference |
---|---|
Description | Number of ECGs that pass a visual overlay |
Time Frame | 1 Day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Waveform Assessment Analysis Set: Paired Software and Reference strips collected from subjects were randomly selected. If 6 consecutive paired beats for analysis cannot be found in these strips, they were excluded from further analysis. This analysis set was used for assessing the quality of the clinical waveform. |
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Measure Participants | 61 | 65 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
60
19.9%
|
65
22.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR), Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Comments | H0: agreement proportion of visual display= 0.8 H1: agreement proportion of visual display> 0.8 Under the assumption that the true population agreement proportion of visual display was 90%, 88 subjects would provide at least 80% power to reject the null hypothesis using a one-sided type I error of 0.05. To account for obtaining readable waveforms, approximately 140 subjects (70 SR; 70 AF) were randomly selected. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | 1 sided exact binomial | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Software's Ability to Produce a Clinically Equivalent Waveform in Agreement to a Gold Standard Lead 1 Reference |
---|---|
Description | Difference in R-wave amplitudes between the software and gold standard reference |
Time Frame | 1 Day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Waveform Assessment Analysis Set: Paired Software and Reference strips collected from subjects were randomly selected. If 6 consecutive paired beats for analysis cannot be found in these strips, they were excluded from further analysis. This analysis set was used for assessing the quality of the clinical waveform. |
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Measure Participants | 61 | 65 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
58
19.3%
|
65
22.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR), Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Comments | H0: agreement proportion of R wave amplitude = 0.8 H1: agreement proportion of R wave amplitude > 0.8 Under the assumption that the true population agreement proportion of R wave amplitude was 90%, 88 subjects would provide at least 80% power to reject the null hypothesis using a one-sided type I error of 0.05. To account for obtaining readable waveforms, approximately 140 subjects (70 SR; 70 AF) were randomly selected. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | 1 sided exact binomial | |
Comments |
Title | Ease of Use |
---|---|
Description | Average ease of use on a 1 (Unable to Use) to 5 (Easiest to Use) scale |
Time Frame | 1 Day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs |
Measure Participants | 301 | 287 |
1 = Unable to Use |
2
0.7%
|
1
0.3%
|
2 = Below Average Ease of Use |
4
1.3%
|
2
0.7%
|
3 = Average Ease of Use |
14
4.7%
|
16
5.6%
|
4 = Above Average Ease of Use |
41
13.6%
|
29
10.1%
|
5 = Easiest to Use |
240
79.7%
|
239
83.3%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event or Mortality were assessed/monitored. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Patient with a known history of AF who is in AF at the time of study screening. 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | Patient with no known diagnosis of AF or other arrhythmia 1-Lead ECG: All participants will record three single-lead ECGs 12-Lead ECG: All participants will simultaneously record three 12-lead ECGs | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/301 (0%) | 0/301 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/301 (0%) | 0/301 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Normal Sinus Rhythm (SR) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/301 (0%) | 0/301 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Health Technology Clinical Operations |
---|---|
Organization | Apple |
Phone | 1-866-905-5303 |
htclinicalquestions@apple.com |
- 099-11774