PAF CRIOBLAF: Cryoballoon Pulmonary Venous Isolation in Patients Referred for Typical Atrial Flutter Ablation

Sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01521988
Collaborator
Medtronic (Industry)
76
15
2
70
5.1
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

  • Background:

Atrial fibrillation is frequently associated with typical atrial flutter in clinical practice. If the radical treatment of atrial flutter by radiofrequency catheter is achieved in most cases without recurrence, it does not prevent the occurrence of atrial fibrillation that occurs in about 70% of these patients after several years of follow-up. However, the latter arrhythmia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The problem of atrial fibrillation occurrence after successful ablation of typical atrial flutter remains physicians primary concern in monitoring these patients.

  • Objectives:

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the pulmonary veins isolation using balloon cryotherapy technology performed at the time of flutter ablation, significantly reduces the risk of developing atrial fibrillation in the two year period following the procedure.

  • Selection Criteria:

Patients referred for ablation of typical atrial flutter with an history of at least one documented episode of atrial fibrillation (atrial flutter remaining the predominant arrhythmia)will be enrolled in the study.

  • Study Methods:

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, 2-arms study, comparing the rate of atrial fibrillation occurrence over a two years period following either an ablation procedure of typical atrial flutter (Group 1), or a combined procedure of typical atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary veins cryoballoon isolation (Group 2). The enrollment period will be of 18 months.

Randomization will be 1:1 and will be balanced in blocks of varying size. Patients will then be regularly followed up clinically and by long-term ECG recordings.

  • Evaluation Criteria:

The primary endpoint will be the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial fibrillation, documented by an ECG or an R-test, occurring between M3 and M24

  • Number of patients:

170 patients will be enrolled in the study

  • Number of centers:

Four French and three German centers will participate.

  • Perspective:

The demonstration of a clinical benefit in terms of atrial fibrillation risk reduction in the patient group with pulmonary vein isolation, could lead to a modification of atrial arrhythmia treatment indication.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Atrial flutter ablation
  • Procedure: Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
76 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Combined Right Isthmus Ablation and cryoBalloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Atrial flutter ablation

RF atrial flutter ablation

Procedure: Atrial flutter ablation
Radiofrequency ablation of Atrial flutter

Experimental: Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation

RF Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation

Procedure: Atrial flutter ablation and pulmonary vein isolation
Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter and pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF as documented on an ECG or a long term Holter [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    Main endpoint will be the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial fibrillation as documented by an ECG or a R-test. Sustained AF episodes of more than a minute will be classified depending if they are symptomatic or not.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    Recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter

  2. Rate of occurrence of atypical flutter [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    Occurrence rate of atypical flutter defined as a continuous atrial activity (with no return to the isoelectric line)in at least one lead, whose ECG appearance of F waves is different from that of a typical flutter

  3. Rate of occurrence of atrial tachycardia [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    Rate of occurrence of atrial tachycardia defined as an atrial activaty that generates a P wave with return to the isoelectric line in all leads

  4. Rate of complications related to the ablation procedure [an average of 3 months after the ablation procedure]

    The following complications will be considered: Hematoma at punction site, Thromboembolic accident, Tamponnade, Phrenic nerve paralysis, Symptomatic stenosis of pulmonary vein, Atrio-ventricular block Atrioesophageal fistula

  5. Rate of major cardiovascular events [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    Rate of major cardiovascular events such as rehospitalization for arrhythmia, heart failure, or embolic accident

  6. All mortality rate [an average of 24 months following the ablation procedure]

    All mortality rate (including sudden death and any type of death)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
  • Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a spontaneous flutter or with a flutter recurrence when it was not considered appropriate to use a preventive treatment so far. The flutter may have been paroxysmal or may still be present.

  • Patient with at least one documented episode of typical flutter defined as follows: negative F waves in the inferior territory, positive in V1 and negative in V6 lead, F wave pattern with characteristic "saw tooth" appearance and finally a heart rate comprised between 240 and 320 beats per minute.

  • Patient with effective anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 weeks.

  • Patient with at least one episode of AF (lasting more than 1 minute) documented on an ECG or a 24 hour Holter recording

  • Patient who signed an informed consent.

  • Patient with age ≥ 18 yo and ≤ 75 yo

  • Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following characteristics will be excluded:

  • Contraindication to right-heart catheterization

  • Contraindication to an anticoagulant treatment

  • Patient for which AF is predominant (more recordings of AF than Flutter)

  • Persistent AF at the time of inclusion visit

  • History of mitral valve surgery

  • Known disorders of blood clotting

  • Cardiothyreosis

  • Life expectancy < 24 months

  • Less than 18 years old and pregnant ladies. As before any ablation, a pregnancy test will be done the day before or the day of the procedure

  • Patient less than 18 years old

  • Patient under guardianship

  • Patient deprived of their liberty by a court decision

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU de Brest Brest France
2 CHU Grenoble Grenoble France 38000
3 CH La Rochelle La Rochelle France
4 AP-HM - Hôpital Nord Marseille France
5 Hôpital Privé de Clairval Marseille France
6 CHU de Nantes Nantes France
7 Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises Nantes France
8 CHU de Rennes Rennes France 35033
9 University Hospital of Rouen Rouen France 76000
10 CHU de Strasbourg Strasbourg France
11 Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France 31076
12 CHU de Tours Tours France
13 Clinique Saint Gatien Tours France
14 Clinique Saint Joseph Trelaze France
15 Polyclinique Vauban Valenciennes France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Rouen
  • Medtronic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederic Anselme, MD, University Hospital, Rouen

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Rouen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01521988
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2011/089/HP
First Posted:
Jan 31, 2012
Last Update Posted:
May 29, 2018
Last Verified:
May 1, 2018
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Rouen
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 29, 2018