ADAPT: ADHD Medication and Predictors of Treatment Outcome

Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02136147
Collaborator
(none)
632
1
85
7.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

ADHD medication of children and adolescents is becoming increasingly common. Clinical experience and scientific studies have proven that approximately 30% of children/adolescents with ADHD do not benefit from this treatment. However, there is insufficient knowledge about who these children are. All children and adolescents, who start treatment with ADHD medication at public Child and Adolescent Psychiatry units in Stockholm, on Gotland, an in Västerbotten, will be asked to participate in the study. The investigators intend to monitor the patients´clinical symptoms and possible side-effects after treatment start. The investigators will collect background information and saliva samples from the patient and his/her parents to be able to study if there are any genetic (hereditary) or other markers that can predict positive or negative outcomes of the ADHD medication. With this information, the investigators aim at, to a greater extent, be able to individualize treatment choices for children and adolescents with ADHD without unnecessary, costly and possibly unfavorable treatment attempts.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: methylphenidate medication
  • Drug: atomoxetine medication
  • Drug: lisdexamphetamine medication
  • Drug: guanfacine medication

Detailed Description

The specific aims for the ADAPT study are:
  1. Investigate if certain gene polymorphisms are associated with poor effect of ADHD drugs (non-responders).

  2. Investigate if other biologically, phenotypic or psychosocial factors are associated with poor effect of ADHD drugs (non-responders).

  3. Investigate if the frequency of side-effects of ADHD drugs differs between children with different genotypes.

  4. Investigate if the frequency of side-effects of ADHD drugs differs between children with different phenotypic and/or psychosocial factors

Method:

This study has a naturalistic design. The aim is to map all new treatments with ADHD drugs at all 13 public BUP units in Stockholm County, one BUP unit on Gotland, and three BUP units in Västerbotten Region. The participation means that medication is initiated as planned in normal clinical practice by the child´s ordinary physician, and beyond this only means a somewhat denser and more structured follow-up. In addition, the investigators will ask for saliva samples from the patient and his/her parents. The investigators aim at including at least 1000 individuals in total in the study.

Part of the data will be collected via the national Quality Register for ADHD Treatment Follow-up (BUSA), which has approved security procedures approved by the Swedish Data Inspection Board.

Case report forms are computerized and separate from the database registry for collected study data. The database and detailed variable lists are constructed in collaboration with professional database managers.

Standard Operation Procedures are designed in collaboration by project coordinator, study nurse and principal investigator, and may be revised after pilot phase.

Collected samples will be stored at KI biobank.

Data analysis:
  1. To judge if the patient is a responder to ADHD drugs the SNAP-IV rating of ADHD symptoms (before and after medication start) is used. The patients who at 3 months have an at least 40% reduction in SNAP-IV score are reckoned "responders" and those who at the same time point have a less than 20% change in SNAP-IV score are reckoned "non-responders". Differences between the groups will be analyzed with logistic regression, with responder status as depending variable, and genotype and the other risk markers (biological, phenotypic, and psychosocial markers) as independent variables after correction for symptoms at baseline. Even a 50% drop-out rate will (i.e. 1000 out of estimated 2000 eligible individuals) give a 98% power to identify a 49% increase in non-responder proportion for a specific genotype.

  2. Concomitantly, the outcome in side-effects, heart rate, blood pressure, weight (z-score) and length (z-score) will be analyzed with linear regression with the same independent variables.

  3. The analyses are performed separately for each ADHD drug.

  4. There are significantly more boys than girls (about 4:1) with ADHD. Given the sex difference in prevalence it is obvious to also include sex as a covariate in our analyses of treatment outcome.

  5. Missing data will be treated according to the principles of complete case and multiple imputation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Actual Enrollment :
632 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Naturalistic Study of ADHD Medication and Predictors of Treatment Outcome
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Children with ADHD medication

Identified responders and non-responders in children/adolescents starting medication for treatment of ADHD in public child and adolescent psychiatric services in Stockholm, on Gotland, and in Västerbotten.

Drug: methylphenidate medication
Other Names:
  • N06BA04
  • Concerta
  • Ritalin
  • Equasym
  • Medikinet
  • Drug: atomoxetine medication
    Other Names:
  • N06BA09
  • Strattera
  • Drug: lisdexamphetamine medication
    Other Names:
  • N06BA12
  • Elvanse
  • Drug: guanfacine medication
    Other Names:
  • C02AC02
  • Intuniv
  • Lisdexamphetamine medication

    Identified responders and non-responders in children/adolescents starting medication with lisdexamphetamine in public child and adolescent psychiatric services in Stockholm and on Gotland.

    Drug: lisdexamphetamine medication
    Other Names:
  • N06BA12
  • Elvanse
  • Atomoxetine medication

    Identified responders and non-responders in children/adolescents starting medication with atomoxetine in public child and adolescent psychiatric services in Stockholm and on Gotland.

    Drug: atomoxetine medication
    Other Names:
  • N06BA09
  • Strattera
  • Methylphenidate medication

    Identified responders and non-responders in children/adolescents starting medication with methylphenidate in public child and adolescent psychiatric services in Stockholm and on Gotland.

    Drug: methylphenidate medication
    Other Names:
  • N06BA04
  • Concerta
  • Ritalin
  • Equasym
  • Medikinet
  • Guanfacine medication

    Identified responders and non-responders in children/adolescents starting medication with guanfacine in public child and adolescent psychiatric services in Stockholm and on Gotland.

    Drug: guanfacine medication
    Other Names:
  • C02AC02
  • Intuniv
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. change in SNAP-IV Teacher and Parent rating scale (Swanson, Nolan and Pelham ADHD Rating Scale) [at 3 months follow-up]

      ADHD symptoms

    2. change in P-SEC (Pediatric Side Effects Checklist) [at 3 months follow-up]

      Side-effect measure

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. change in C-GAS (Children´s global assessment scale) [at 12 months follow-up]

      global functioning measure

    2. change in CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression- of Severity) [at 12 months follow-up]

      disease severity

    3. change in SNAP-IV Teacher and Parent rating scale [at 1 month follow-up]

      ADHD symptoms

    4. change in SNAP-IV Teacher and Parent rating scale [at 6 months follow-up]

      ADHD symptoms

    5. change in SNAP-IV Teacher and Parent rating scale [at 12 months follow-up]

      ADHD symptoms

    6. change in P-SEC (Pediatric Side Effects Checklist) [at 1 month follow-up]

      side effect measure

    7. change in P-SEC (Pediatric Side Effects Checklist) [at 6 months follow-up]

      side effect measure

    8. change in P-SEC (Pediatric Side Effects Checklist) [at 12 months follow-up]

      side effect measure

    9. change in Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) [at 1 month follow-up]

      symptoms of anxiety

    10. change in Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) [at 3 months follow-up]

      symptoms of anxiety

    11. change in Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) [at 6 months follow-up]

      symptoms of anxiety

    12. change in Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) [at 12 months follow-up]

      symptoms of anxiety

    13. change in heart rate [at 1 month follow-up]

    14. change in heart rate [at 3 months follow-up]

    15. change in heart rate [at 6 months follow-up]

    16. change in heart rate [at 12 months follow-up]

    17. change in systolic blood pressure [at 1 month follow-up]

    18. change in systolic blood pressure [at 3 months follow-up]

    19. change in systolic blood pressure [at 6 months follow-up]

    20. change in systolic blood pressure [at 12 months follow-up]

    21. change in diastolic blood pressure [at 1 month follow-up]

    22. change in diastolic blood pressure [at 3 months follow-up]

    23. change in diastolic blood pressure [at 6 months follow-up]

    24. change in diastolic blood pressure [at 12 months follow-up]

    25. change in weight z-score [at 1 month follow-up]

    26. change in weight z-score [at 3 months follow-up]

    27. change in weight z-score [at 6 months follow-up]

    28. change in weight z-score [at 12 months follow-up]

    29. change in height z-score [at 6 months follow-up]

    30. change in height z-score [at 12 months follow-up]

    31. change in Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) score [at 3 months follow-up]

      symptoms of autism

    32. change in Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) score [at 1 months follow-up]

      symptoms of autism

    33. change in Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) score [at 6 months follow-up]

      symptoms of autism

    34. change in Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) score [at 12 months follow-up]

      symptoms of autism

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. change in self-harm frequency [at 12 months follow-up]

      change in self-harm frequency behavior as noted in the quality register BUSA

    2. change in suicide attempt frequency [at 12 months follow-up]

      change in suicide attempt frequency as reported in quality register BUSA

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    6 Years to 18 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Clinical diagnosis of ADHD

    • Starting medication against ADHD symptoms with atomoxetine, methylphenidate, lisdexamphetamine, or guanfacine

    Exclusion Criteria: Any medication against ADHD the last 3 months

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Division for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm County Sweden

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Karolinska Institutet

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Linda Halldner Henriksson, MD, PhD, Karolinska Institutet
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02136147
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ADAPT
    • LS 1110-1339
    • SLS-309701
    First Posted:
    May 12, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 8, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Keywords provided by Linda Halldner Henriksson, MD, PhD, Karolinska Institutet
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 8, 2021