Project1: Single Versus Combination Medication Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00429273
Collaborator
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (NIH)
212
1
3
53.9
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a single drug versus a combination of drugs in treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood mental disorders. Children with ADHD have impaired functioning in multiple settings, including home and school. They also have difficulty relating with peers. If left untreated, the disorder may cause adverse effects that can last into adolescence and adulthood. Stimulant medications, such as methylphenidate, are effective in reducing ADHD symptoms on a short-term basis. However, few long-term benefits in academic or general functioning from current ADHD therapies have been demonstrated. Focalin XR is a stimulant medication that is FDA-approved for treating ADHD. Guanfacine is another medication that is currently approved for the treatment of hypertension, but has long been used for treating ADHD. This study will determine the effectiveness of a combination of Focalin XR and guanfacine in enhancing cognitive functioning and improving the long-term benefit of ADHD treatment.

Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment regimens:

Methylphenidate (Focalin XR) and placebo; guanfacine and placebo; or Focalin XR and guanfacine. The study will be conducted in two phases: an 8-week double-blind treatment phase and a 12-month open-label treatment phase. In Phase I, one third of participants will receive placebo for the initial 4 weeks, followed by Focalin XR alone for the remaining 4 weeks. All other participants will receive their assigned medications for the full 8 weeks. All participants will attend two study visits prior to beginning treatment and one study visit per week throughout Phase I. At the end of Phase I, treatment assignments will be unblinded. Participants who experienced adequate improvement with their assigned treatment will then continue in Phase II on the same medication(s) for an additional 12 months. Participants will attend study visits once per month until the end of the study. Study visits will include self-report measures, clinical assessments, and cognitive testing. Participants will also undergo four electroencephalography (EEG) tests and two fMRI scans over the course of the study. All Phase II participants will receive a follow-up telephone call 1 month after the final study visit.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
212 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
An Eight-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Guanfacine, Focalin XR, and the Combination, With a Twelve Month Open-Label Extension for the Treatment of ADHD in Pediatric Subjects Aged 7 to 14 Years
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo

weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine + Placebo

Drug: Guanfacine
Week 1: 0.5 mg twice daily; Week 2: 1 mg twice daily; Week 3: 1.5 mg twice daily; Weeks 4 through 8: best dose as determined by efficacy measures
Other Names:
  • Tenex
  • Active Comparator: Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH

    weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH

    Drug: Methylphenidate (MPH)
    Participants less than 25 kg will receive 10 mg once daily for Week 5, 20 mg once daily for Week 6, and 30 mg once daily for Week 7. Subjects greater than 25 kg will receive 20 mg once daily for Week 5, 30 mg once daily for Week 6, 40 mg once daily for Week 7, and best doses as determined by efficacy measures for Week 8.
    Other Names:
  • Focalin XR
  • Experimental: Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH (Comb)

    weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH

    Drug: Guanfacine
    Week 1: 0.5 mg twice daily; Week 2: 1 mg twice daily; Week 3: 1.5 mg twice daily; Weeks 4 through 8: best dose as determined by efficacy measures
    Other Names:
  • Tenex
  • Drug: Methylphenidate (MPH)
    Participants less than 25 kg will receive 10 mg once daily for Week 5, 20 mg once daily for Week 6, and 30 mg once daily for Week 7. Subjects greater than 25 kg will receive 20 mg once daily for Week 5, 30 mg once daily for Week 6, 40 mg once daily for Week 7, and best doses as determined by efficacy measures for Week 8.
    Other Names:
  • Focalin XR
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. ADHD IV Rating Scale (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) [Measured at baseline Week 4 and Week 8]

      The primary clinical efficacy variable for treatment was the ADHD-RS-IV (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) Total Score and two sub-scales (Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive ). The rating scale has 18 questions with answer options: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) and Severe (3). Min 0; max 3. Scores are obtained by summing each item; The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Total score range: 0-54 Total Inattentive score range: 0-27 Total Hyperactive/Impulsive score range: 0-27

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    7 Years to 14 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosis of DSM-IV ADHD by K-SADS-PL and confirmed by clinical interview

    • Clinical Global Impression-Severity score of at least 4 for ADHD

    • Resided with primary caretaker for at least 6 months prior to study entry

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History of autism, pervasive developmental disorder, chronic tic disorder, psychosis, or bipolar disorder

    • Current major depression or panic disorder

    • Systolic or diastolic blood pressure at screening greater than the 95th percentile or less than the 5th percentile for age and body mass index (BMI)

    • Any medical condition that might make stimulant or alpha agonist therapy medically inadvisable

    • Need for chronic use of other medications with central nervous system effects

    • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or beyond menarche and has a positive urine pregnancy test

    • History of structural heart defects, syncope, or fainting while exercising

    • Clinically significant cardiac abnormality as determined by echocardiogram (ECG) at study entry

    • Mental retardation as determined by clinical functional assessment and an IQ estimate of less than 70 based on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) subtests

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California United States 90095

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: James T. McCracken, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
    • Study Director: James J. McGough, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    James McCracken, Chair, University of California, Los Angeles
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00429273
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • P50MH077248-01
    • P50MH077248-01
    • 10-000453
    First Posted:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 30, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by James McCracken, Chair, University of California, Los Angeles
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail 212 randomized (deemed eligible and enrolled). 71 randomized to Group 1: 3 dropped prior to receiving drug; thus 68 started drug. 70 randomized to Group 2: 1 dropped before receiving drug; thus 69 started drug. 71 randomized to Group 3:1 dropped before receiving drug; thus 70 started drug.
    Arm/Group Title Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
    Arm/Group Description weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+Placebo weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 68 69 70
    COMPLETED 60 61 61
    NOT COMPLETED 8 8 9

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH (Comb) Total
    Arm/Group Description weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine +Placebo weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb) Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 68 69 70 207
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    10.1
    (2.1)
    10.1
    (2.0)
    9.9
    (2.2)
    10.0
    (2.1)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    23
    33.8%
    23
    33.3%
    19
    27.1%
    65
    31.4%
    Male
    45
    66.2%
    46
    66.7%
    51
    72.9%
    142
    68.6%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White
    51
    75%
    51
    73.9%
    41
    58.6%
    143
    69.1%
    African American
    7
    10.3%
    10
    14.5%
    19
    27.1%
    36
    17.4%
    Asian, Pacific Islander
    7
    10.3%
    4
    5.8%
    5
    7.1%
    16
    7.7%
    Other
    3
    4.4%
    4
    5.8%
    5
    7.1%
    12
    5.8%
    Hispanic
    16
    23.5%
    10
    14.5%
    18
    25.7%
    44
    21.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title ADHD IV Rating Scale (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale)
    Description The primary clinical efficacy variable for treatment was the ADHD-RS-IV (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) Total Score and two sub-scales (Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive ). The rating scale has 18 questions with answer options: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) and Severe (3). Min 0; max 3. Scores are obtained by summing each item; The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Total score range: 0-54 Total Inattentive score range: 0-27 Total Hyperactive/Impulsive score range: 0-27
    Time Frame Measured at baseline Week 4 and Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Every contrast includes estimates of maturation/time trend and the within subject covariance structure based on all participants using full information maximum likelihood estimation.
    Arm/Group Title Estimated Difference Between Guan and Placebo Estimated Difference Between DMPH and Placebo Estimated Difference Between Placebo and Combo
    Arm/Group Description Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with guam and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for guan are based on the guan-guan arm both at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and the guan-combo arm at 4 weeks only. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points. Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with dmph and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for DMPH are based on the placebo-guan arm at 8 weeks. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points. Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with combo and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for DMPH are based on the guan-combo arm at 8 weeks. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points.
    Measure Participants 207 207 207
    Total ADHD-RS Score
    -7.77
    (1.70)
    -7.99
    (1.22)
    -10.66
    (1.99)
    Inattentive Subscale
    -4.14
    (0.99)
    -4.10
    (0.71)
    -5.89
    (1.15)
    Hyperactive Impulsive Subscale
    -3.73
    (0.92)
    -4.0
    (0.69)
    -5.10
    (1.12)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Estimated Difference Between Guan and Placebo, Estimated Difference Between DMPH and Placebo, Estimated Difference Between Placebo and Combo
    Comments Analyses are based on a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) modelling the effects of the medication when calibrated to optimal dosage and controlling for time effects and within-subject effects. The design is a combined within-between subject design, where each participant is exposed to, and provides information about multiple tx modalities.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments Test for differences in treatment outcomes between three different tx
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.01
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter F-Value for variance component
    Estimated Value 18.90
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
    Arm/Group Description week 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+Placebo week 1-4: Placebo week 5-8: Placebo+DMPH week 1-4: Guanfacine week 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
    All Cause Mortality
    Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/68 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/70 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/68 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/70 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 66/68 (97.1%) 66/69 (95.7%) 69/70 (98.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal Pain Upper 11/68 (16.2%) 11 10/69 (14.5%) 10 10/70 (14.3%) 10
    Abdominal Pain 19/68 (27.9%) 19 18/69 (26.1%) 18 16/70 (22.9%) 16
    General disorders
    Insomnia 18/68 (26.5%) 18 20/69 (29%) 20 24/70 (34.3%) 24
    Lethargy 23/68 (33.8%) 23 9/69 (13%) 9 16/70 (22.9%) 16
    Fatigue 22/68 (32.4%) 22 5/69 (7.2%) 5 12/70 (17.1%) 12
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased Appetite 15/68 (22.1%) 15 31/69 (44.9%) 31 25/70 (35.7%) 25
    Psychiatric disorders
    Headache 34/68 (50%) 34 23/69 (33.3%) 23 23/70 (32.9%) 23
    Irritability 15/68 (22.1%) 15 12/69 (17.4%) 12 18/70 (25.7%) 18
    Sedation 12/68 (17.6%) 12 4/69 (5.8%) 4 16/70 (22.9%) 16
    Somnolence 16/68 (23.5%) 16 3/69 (4.3%) 3 15/70 (21.4%) 15
    Affect Lability 7/68 (10.3%) 7 14/69 (20.3%) 14 8/70 (11.4%) 8
    Vascular disorders
    Dizziness 8/68 (11.8%) 8 6/69 (8.7%) 6 7/70 (10%) 7

    Limitations/Caveats

    Larger group sizes would enable more conclusive tests of treatment differences; Study design began with guanfacine first and addition of a stimulant second, making difficult to compare to those study designs adding guanfacine to ongoing stimulants.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title James T. McCracken, M.D.
    Organization University of California, Los Angeles
    Phone 310-825-0470
    Email jmccracken@mednet.ucla.edu
    Responsible Party:
    James McCracken, Chair, University of California, Los Angeles
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00429273
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • P50MH077248-01
    • P50MH077248-01
    • 10-000453
    First Posted:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 30, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021