Examining Tolerance to CNS Stimulants in ADHD
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Although stimulant medication is a well-established treatment for ADHD, it is often necessary for doctors to increase the dose over time to maintain the benefits of the medication. While medication can be very effective for improving symptoms of ADHD during the first year of use, it has not been found to significantly improve the long term course of children with ADHD. For example, in large research studies, groups of children who take medication for ten years do not have consistently better academic grades than groups of children who never used medication (individual results will vary from child to child).
In order to help children with ADHD achieve the best possible outcomes, it is important for doctors to study why this happens. One possible reason is development of tolerance to the medication. Tolerance means that a drug's effects decrease when it is taken consistently over time, so that an increased dose is needed to continue showing effects. Some doctors believe that children who take stimulant medication for ADHD develop tolerance to it which would explain why benefits may not persist over time, but no research studies have been done to measure whether this occurs. This study aims to see if children show a tolerance effect to stimulant medication and whether that tolerance can be prevented by taking short breaks from the medication called medication holidays.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
This is an innovative evaluation of tolerance using an objective measure in an analog classroom. Each subject will complete the a 10-minute math test twice a day for three weeks on optimal dose or placebo, and then be crossed over to the other condition. Within-subject drug/placebo differences will be compared over the three weeks of exposure to assess tolerance in the analog setting.
When school commences, 50% of the sample will be randomized to 7-day-a-week (continuous) dosing and 50% to 5-day-a- week (weekend holidays) dosing to examine the efficacy of prescribed weekend drug holidays for combatting need for dose escalations (tolerance) during the school year.
Participants will be assessed monthly to detect deteriorating functioning. Using a standardized protocol, study physicians will increase dose for subjects in either arm who meet defined impairment thresholds. The difference between the two dosing conditions will inform regarding how best to deal with tolerance in clinical application.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Methylphenidate 7-day dosing During the school year, children in this arm will receive 7-day dosing of medication. |
Drug: Methylphenidate
Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Methylphenidate 5-day dosing During the school year phase, these children will receive 5-day dosing with weekend holidays. |
Drug: Methylphenidate
Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Dose Changes Required Per Protocol [10 months]
Monthly evaluations of medication efficacy will be used to determine whether dose adjustments are needed due to anticipated tolerance effects.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to First Dose Increase [10 months]
The amount of time elapsed before a child requires a dose increase during the school year will be measured in months.
- Endpoint Medication Dose [End of Phase 2 School Year]
Dose of medication reported in mg/kg/day
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
-
Full Scale IQ above 80
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Psychotropic medications for conditions other than ADHD
-
Active medical or psychiatric conditions that could be worsened by stimulants
-
Diagnosis of Autism or Asperger's Disorder
-
Documented intolerance fo methylphenidate or failed trial of OROS MPH
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Florida International University Center for Children and Families | Miami | Florida | United States | 33199 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Florida International University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: William E Pelham, Ph.D., Florida International University
- Principal Investigator: James M Swanson, Ph.D., Florida International University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- MH099030
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited in 4 annual cohorts from 2013-2016. Participants could be referred by schools, physicians, or community advertisement; interested parents completed phone screens and a clinic intake to assess inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Because all participants were required to be enrolled in a Summer Treatment Program, some participants withdrew after consenting because they were unable to make the time commitment to the 8-week summer program. |
Arm/Group Title | Phase 1-Summer; Medication First, Then Placebo | Phase 1-Summer; Placebo First, Then Medication | Phase 2 School Year - 7-Day Dosing | Phase 2 School Year; 5-Day Dosing |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the first phase of the study, children participated in a crossover design of placebo and optimal-dose methylphenidate for 13 days in each condition. After a 9-day titration period, the Medication First group received their optimal dose of methylphenidate for 13 days, a 2-day medication/placebo probe, a 2-day washout, then placebo for 13 days and a 2-day medication/placebo probe. | In the first phase of the study, children participated in a crossover design of placebo and optimal-dose methylphenidate for 13 days in each condition. After a 9-day titration period, the Placebo First group received placebo for 13 days, a 2-day medication/placebo probe, a 2-day washout, then optimal-dose medication for 13 days and a 2-day medication/placebo probe. | During the school year, all participants took their optimal dose determined in Phase 1 of the study for the entire school year. These partcipants received medication 7-days a week for the entire year. | During the school year, all participants took their optimal dose determined during Phase 1 for the entire school year. These participants received medication on school-days only with drug holidays over weekends. |
Period Title: Phase 1-Summer | ||||
STARTED | 129 | 138 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 116 | 132 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Phase 1-Summer | ||||
STARTED | 0 | 0 | 121 | 124 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 109 | 116 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 12 | 8 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Phase 1-Summer |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the first phase of the study, all children participate in a crossover design of placebo and optimal-dose methylphenidate for 13 days in each condition. |
Overall Participants | 267 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
267
100%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
0
0%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
54
20.2%
|
Male |
213
79.8%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
Hispanic or Latino |
224
83.9%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
43
16.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
2
0.7%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
22
8.2%
|
White |
237
88.8%
|
More than one race |
6
2.2%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
267
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Dose Changes Required Per Protocol |
---|---|
Description | Monthly evaluations of medication efficacy will be used to determine whether dose adjustments are needed due to anticipated tolerance effects. |
Time Frame | 10 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants who began Phase 2 were included in analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Methylphenidate 7-day Dosing | Methylphenidate 5-day Dosing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | During the school year, children in this arm will receive 7-day dosing of medication. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. | During the school year phase, these children will receive 5-day dosing with weekend holidays. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. |
Measure Participants | 124 | 121 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Number of Increases] |
1.79
(1.16)
|
1.61
(1.08)
|
Title | Time to First Dose Increase |
---|---|
Description | The amount of time elapsed before a child requires a dose increase during the school year will be measured in months. |
Time Frame | 10 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Methylphenidate 7-day Dosing | Methylphenidate 5-day Dosing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | During the school year, children in this arm will receive 7-day dosing of medication. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. | During the school year phase, these children will receive 5-day dosing with weekend holidays. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. |
Measure Participants | 124 | 121 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Months] |
3.8
(3.4)
|
4.1
(3.5)
|
Title | Endpoint Medication Dose |
---|---|
Description | Dose of medication reported in mg/kg/day |
Time Frame | End of Phase 2 School Year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only participants who completed the entire school year are used in endpoint medication dosing calculations. |
Arm/Group Title | Methylphenidate 7-day Dosing | Methylphenidate 5-day Dosing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | During the school year, children in this arm will receive 7-day dosing of medication. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. | During the school year phase, these children will receive 5-day dosing with weekend holidays. Methylphenidate: Children will receive a double-blind assessment to determine their optimal starting dose of Concerta. Doses will be adjusted over the course of the school year and inceased if tolerance to the medication is detected. |
Measure Participants | 116 | 109 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Mg/kg/day] |
1.30
(0.43)
|
1.24
(0.41)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | During Phase 1, side effects ratings were collected from parents daily for the first 2 weeks of the summer and weekly for the final 6 weeks of the summer. During Phase 2, side-effects ratings were completed by parents monthly at medication dispensing visits. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Parents completed the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale, rating each of the most common side effects of stimulant medication on a scale of None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe. Adverse events were counted if parents rated the side effect at the Moderate or Severe level on at least one occasion, | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | Phase 1-Medication First | Phase 1 - Placebo First | Phase 2 - 7-Day Dosing | Phase 2 - 5-Day Dosing | ||||
Arm/Group Description | In the first phase of the study, children participated in a crossover design of placebo and optimal-dose methylphenidate for 13 days in each condition. After a 9-day titration period, the Medication First group received methylphenidate for 13 days, a 2-day medication/placebo probe, a 2-day washout, then placebo for 13 days and a 2-day medication/placebo probe. | In the first phase of the study, children participated in a crossover design of placebo and optimal-dose methylphenidate for 13 days in each condition. After a 9-day titration period, the Placebo First group received placebo for 13 days, a 2-day medication/placebo probe, a 2-day washout, then optimal-dose medication for 13 days and a 2-day medication/placebo probe. | During the school year, all participants took their optimal dose determined in Phase 1 of the study for the entire school year. These participants received medication 7-days a week for the entire year | During the school year, all participants took their optimal dose determined during Phase 1 for the entire school year. These participants received medication on school-days only with drug holidays over weekends. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Phase 1-Medication First | Phase 1 - Placebo First | Phase 2 - 7-Day Dosing | Phase 2 - 5-Day Dosing | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/129 (0%) | 0/138 (0%) | 0/121 (0%) | 0/124 (0%) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Phase 1-Medication First | Phase 1 - Placebo First | Phase 2 - 7-Day Dosing | Phase 2 - 5-Day Dosing | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/129 (0.8%) | 0/138 (0%) | 1/121 (0.8%) | 1/124 (0.8%) | ||||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||
Hospitalized | 1/129 (0.8%) | 1 | 0/138 (0%) | 0 | 1/121 (0.8%) | 1 | 1/124 (0.8%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Phase 1-Medication First | Phase 1 - Placebo First | Phase 2 - 7-Day Dosing | Phase 2 - 5-Day Dosing | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 72/129 (55.8%) | 78/138 (56.5%) | 91/121 (75.2%) | 85/124 (68.5%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Appetite Loss | 66/129 (51.2%) | 252 | 72/138 (52.2%) | 265 | 46/121 (38%) | 131 | 51/124 (41.1%) | 143 |
Stomachache | 23/129 (17.8%) | 51 | 24/138 (17.4%) | 55 | 21/121 (17.4%) | 29 | 17/124 (13.7%) | 25 |
General disorders | ||||||||
Insomnia | 52/129 (40.3%) | 163 | 56/138 (40.6%) | 190 | 46/121 (38%) | 118 | 34/124 (27.4%) | 80 |
Motor Tics | 17/129 (13.2%) | 23 | 19/138 (13.8%) | 25 | 17/121 (14%) | 24 | 14/124 (11.3%) | 19 |
Buccal-lingual movements | 15/129 (11.6%) | 27 | 17/138 (12.3%) | 29 | 10/121 (8.3%) | 11 | 16/124 (12.9%) | 20 |
Picking at skin, nailbiting | 37/129 (28.7%) | 83 | 28/138 (20.3%) | 90 | 38/121 (31.4%) | 73 | 37/124 (29.8%) | 91 |
Worried/Anxious | 27/129 (20.9%) | 61 | 30/138 (21.7%) | 66 | 25/121 (20.7%) | 40 | 34/124 (27.4%) | 63 |
Dull, tired, listless | 27/129 (20.9%) | 56 | 30/138 (21.7%) | 61 | 14/121 (11.6%) | 18 | 19/124 (15.3%) | 32 |
Headache | 17/129 (13.2%) | 32 | 19/138 (13.8%) | 32 | 15/121 (12.4%) | 24 | 14/124 (11.3%) | 23 |
Irritability | 42/129 (32.6%) | 97 | 46/138 (33.3%) | 104 | 38/121 (31.4%) | 71 | 36/124 (29%) | 62 |
Tearful, depressed | 25/129 (19.4%) | 49 | 27/138 (19.6%) | 53 | 14/121 (11.6%) | 15 | 20/124 (16.1%) | 31 |
Social Withdrawal | 13/129 (10.1%) | 13 | 14/138 (10.1%) | 28 | 5/121 (4.1%) | 6 | 10/124 (8.1%) | 16 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | William E. Pelham, Jr., Ph.D. |
---|---|
Organization | Florida International University |
Phone | 305-348-0477 |
wpelham@fiu.edu |
- MH099030