Integrated Management of Atypical Parkinsonism: A Home-based Patient-Centered Healthcare Delivery Based on Telenursing (IMPACT Study)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This project aims to investigate whether an integrated model based on proactive and reactive telenursing monitoring coordinated by a parkinsonism nurse specialist (case manager) is able to improve care delivery and quality of life of patients with atypical parkinsonisms. This could reduce the risk (e.g. through health education counselling) and the severity of complications (e.g. falls). Main responsibilities of the Co-PI: project idea and supervision, coordination of the study, patient selection and recruitment, patient recruitment, participation in statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. Co-PI is responsible of the rate of recruitment and drop-out
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
People with parkinsonism experience a wide range of motor and non-motor disorders associated with the increasing complexity of care delivery and the increased risk of complications with increased hospital access. Although a number of multidisciplinary care models have been proposed so far, results have been disappointing in terms of benefit in quality of life and cost-effectiveness. An integrated remote care model at home, involving a parkinsonism nurse specialist (PKNS) as well as a movement disorder specialist, could offer significant benefits to patients and healthcare professionals through better health education, continuity of care and more careful monitoring of the complications of the accident. In this multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, case-control trial, the investigators will recruit 164 patients with atypical parkinsonism (either MSA or PSP) to investigate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a 12-month remote home-based integrated program to improve healthcare delivery, coordinated by a specialized nurse (case manager) compared to standard medical care. This organizational model of personalized medicine aims to simplify, standardize and improve patient care and monitoring over time, including remote management of situations of urgency. This telenursing program consists of both proactive and reactive monitoring approaches acting synergistically to optimize the continuity of care by tertiary expert movement disorders clinics. In proactive monitoring, patients are contacted at baseline (to create a patient record focused on identifying individual-specific vulnerabilities) and then every 3 months. During the 12-month study period, patients and caregivers may contact the case manager in case of any problems (reactive monitoring), who may: (a) deal with the specific problem also by interacting with the participant's general practitioner and other healthcare professionals (e.g. physical therapist, psychologist, nutritionist, occupational therapist, social worker, etc) or (b) refer to the neurologist for teleconsultation or in-person visit according to a semi-structured algorithm, which assigns 4 levels of priority. Participants will be evaluated with clinical scales testing the quality of life, motor and non-motor symptoms, caregiver burden, adherence to therapy, cumulative disease burden and the number of unscheduled hospital access during the study period. The cost-effectiveness of this method will also be evaluated by using the EuroQoL, which will estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gain. Finally, the investigators will assess the feasibility and utility of Telemonitoring to guide decisionmaking by using a waist-worn wearable (STAT-ONTM) to monitor real-life motor autonomy and the risk of falls, including freezing of gait for 5 consecutive days every month during the 12-month duration of the study. If successful, this low-cost integrated management of patients with atypical parkinsonism may be extended to people with the more prevalent Parkinson's disease as well as other neurodegenerative disorders (e.g. Alzheimer's dementia)
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Telemonitoring Patients are followed up by a nurse-telemonitoring |
Other: Telemonitoring
Patients are followed up by a nurse specialist in parkinsonism who interacts with the treating neurologist and a multidisciplinary team
|
Active Comparator: Standard-of-care Patients are followed up only by the neurologist |
Other: Standard-of-care
Patients are managed only by the neurologist according the institution's clinical practice
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Changes in total score of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39-items scale (PDQ-39) [baseline, week 52]
Thi is a 39-items questionnaire assessing the quality of life of patient with Parkinsonism. Score is expressed in percentage from 0% to 100%. The higher the score the lower the quality of life
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Changes in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II (MDS-UPDRS Part II) [baseline, week 52]
This is a scale (MDS-UPDRS Part II) used to assess activities of daily living. Score ranges from 0 to 52. The higher the score the worse the Disability
- Changes in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part IV (MDS-UPDRS part IV) [baseline, week 52]
This is a scale (MDS-UPDRS part IV) used to assess complications of dopaminergic therapy. Score ranges from 0 to 24. The higher the score the worse the disability
- Changes in the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale score (NMSS) [baseline, week 52]
This is a scale used to assess the burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Total score is 0-360. The higher the score the worse the disability
- Changes in Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) [baseline, week 52]
This scale (UMSARS) is used to assess disease progression in multiple system atrophy.The score is from 0 up to 109. The higher the score the worse the disability
- Changes in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) [baseline, week 52]
This scale (PSPRS) is used to assess disease progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. The total score is 0-100. The higher the score the worse the disability
- Changes in the activities of daily living questionnaire (ADL_questionnaire) [baseline, week 52]
The "ADL (Activities of Daily Living)" evaluation refers to the fundamental activities of daily life in which the subject is dependent: on a scale from 0 to 6 points, the lower the score, the greater the person's need for assistance
- Changes in the intrumental activities of daily living questionnaire (IADL) [baseline, week 52]
The "IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living)" evaluation refers to the instrumental activities of daily life in which the subject is dependent (eg using telephone, preparing meals, taking medications, etc): on a scale from 0 to 8 points, the lower the score, the greater the person's need for assistance
- Changes in the Zarit Burden Interview scale score (ZBI) [baseline, week 52]
This is a scale used to investigate caregiver's burnout. Total score is 0-40. The higher the score the worse the disability
- Number of unplanned hospital admission [week 52]
Sum of number of outpatients departments assessments, number of emergency rooms accesses, number of unplanned hospitalizations
- Number of incident comorbidities [baseline, week 52]
The number of incident comorbidities over the 12.month study period will be assessed using a semistructured interview
- Changes in Euro Quality Of Life Dimensions-5 Levels score (EuroQOL-5) [baseline, week 52]
This is a useful and validated instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. The patient select a score from 0 to 100. The lowest the score the lowest quality of life.
- Changes in the Morisky Medical Adherence scale-8 items score (MMAS) [baseline, week 26, week 52]
This is an 8-items scale used to investigate patient adherence to the therapy prescribed by the MD specialist. Score is 0-8 "yes" answer. The highest the score, the lowest the therapy adherence.
- Changes in patient experience questionnaire (EQ) [baseline, week 26, week 52]
This is a questionnaire assessing patient perception and satisfaction of the quality of health care. Total score is 0-100. The highest the score, the worst the satisfaction
- Changes in freezing of walking, Freezing of gait-questionnaire (FOG-Q) [baseline, week 52]
Changes in gait performances, mainly in freezing of walking, are analysis by this questionnaire. Total score is 0-24. The highest the score, the highest the freezing
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of MSA or PSP in all their possible variants (MSA-P, MSA-C; PSP-RS, PSP-P, PSP-CBS, etc.) according to internationally validated criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Hoehn and Yahr stage = 5 in ON phase
-
Clinical Frialty Scale (CFS) ≥ 8
-
Serious medical disorders that, in the opinion of the recruiting neurologist, may impair participation in the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Gaetano Martino | Messina | Italy | ||
2 | Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta | Milan | Italy | 20133 | |
3 | Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casmiro Mondino | Pavia | Italy | ||
4 | IRCCS Neuromed | Pozzilli | Italy |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casmiro Mondino
- Neuromed IRCCS
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Gaetano Martino, Messina
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roberto Eleopra, MD, Study Principal Investigator Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Borzi L, Mazzetta I, Zampogna A, Suppa A, Irrera F, Olmo G. Predicting Axial Impairment in Parkinson's Disease through a Single Inertial Sensor. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 6;22(2):412. doi: 10.3390/s22020412.
- Cilia R, Mancini F, Bloem BR, Eleopra R. Telemedicine for parkinsonism: A two-step model based on the COVID-19 experience in Milan, Italy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020 Jun;75:130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
- Fabbrini G, Abbruzzese G, Barone P, Antonini A, Tinazzi M, Castegnaro G, Rizzoli S, Morisky DE, Lessi P, Ceravolo R; REASON study group. Adherence to anti-Parkinson drug therapy in the "REASON" sample of Italian patients with Parkinson's disease: the linguistic validation of the Italian version of the "Morisky Medical Adherence Scale-8 items". Neurol Sci. 2013 Nov;34(11):2015-22. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1438-1. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
- Gerlach OH, Broen MP, van Domburg PH, Vermeij AJ, Weber WE. Deterioration of Parkinson's disease during hospitalization: survey of 684 patients. BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 8;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-13.
- Hagell P, Alvariza A, Westergren A, Arestedt K. Assessment of Burden Among Family Caregivers of People With Parkinson's Disease Using the Zarit Burden Interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Feb;53(2):272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
- Hassan A, Wu SS, Schmidt P, Dai Y, Simuni T, Giladi N, Bloem BR, Malaty IA, Okun MS; NPF-QII Investigators. High rates and the risk factors for emergency room visits and hospitalization in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Nov;19(11):949-54. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
- Huse DM, Schulman K, Orsini L, Castelli-Haley J, Kennedy S, Lenhart G. Burden of illness in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2005 Nov;20(11):1449-54. doi: 10.1002/mds.20609.
- Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing. 1997 Sep;26(5):353-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.5.353.
- Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Stack JA, Rifai AH, Mulsant B, Reynolds CF 3rd. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1992 Mar;41(3):237-48. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90005-n.
- Muzerengi S, Herd C, Rick C, Clarke CE. A systematic review of interventions to reduce hospitalisation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Mar;24:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Schrag A, Selai C, Jahanshahi M, Quinn NP. The EQ-5D--a generic quality of life measure-is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;69(1):67-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.67.
- van der Marck MA, Bloem BR, Borm GF, Overeem S, Munneke M, Guttman M. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2013 May;28(5):605-11. doi: 10.1002/mds.25194. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
- Wenning GK, Stankovic I, Vignatelli L, Fanciulli A, Calandra-Buonaura G, Seppi K, Palma JA, Meissner WG, Krismer F, Berg D, Cortelli P, Freeman R, Halliday G, Hoglinger G, Lang A, Ling H, Litvan I, Low P, Miki Y, Panicker J, Pellecchia MT, Quinn N, Sakakibara R, Stamelou M, Tolosa E, Tsuji S, Warner T, Poewe W, Kaufmann H. The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy. Mov Disord. 2022 Jun;37(6):1131-1148. doi: 10.1002/mds.29005. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
- IMPACT