Diagnostic Yield of FNA Needle and FNB Needle for Autoimmune Pancreatitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 19G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has emerged as a valuable method to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and exclude malignancy. During Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), tissue samples can be obtained for pathological evaluation with different devices. Previous studies suggest 19-gauge fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle provides a reliable specimen for diagnosis of AIP. However tissue architecture and cell morphology are essential for accurate pathological assessment. Therefore, pathologists generally prefer a histological specimen. Fine needle biopsy (FNB) has the advantage of obtaining a histological specimen, which may lead to better diagnostic performance. However, the superiority of histology over cytology in EUS-guided tissue sampling for diagnosis of AIP has not been proven yet. In this study, we aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 19G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 19G FNA needle Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of AIP |
Device: 19G FNA needle
Puncture of AIP under Endoscopic Ultrasonography, with a 19-gauge FNA needle
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: 20G FNB needle Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of AIP |
Device: 20G FNB needle
Puncture of AIP under Endoscopic Ultrasonography, with a 20-gauge FNB needle
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Diagnostic accuracy (compared to the gold standard diagnosis) [24 months]
Gold standard diagnosis is defined as: based on the conclusions of the diagnostic work-up (combined outcomes of tissue sampling and imaging studies), and confirmed by a compatible clinical disease course of at least 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Technical success [24 months]
tissue acquisition
- Quality of the tissue sample [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]
Quality, defined as; presence of core tissue
- Quantity of the tissue sample [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]
Quantity, defined as; presence of remnant material after diagnosis was obtained and sufficiency for advanced diagnostic processing
- Diagnostic yield of the first needle pass [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]
- Adverse events [first 24 hours until - 24 months after procedure]
Safety
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition because of clinical suspicion of AIP
-
Age > 18 years
-
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with co-fact or fresh frozen plasma (FFP)
-
Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued in order to guarantee an INR below 1.5
-
Previous inclusion in the current study
-
Pregnancy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Beijing | Beijing | China | 100730 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aiming Yang, M.D., Peking Union Medical College Hospitalollege Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ZS-1767