Diagnostic Yield of FNA Needle and FNB Needle for Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03753815
Collaborator
(none)
46
1
2
36.3
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 19G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: 19G FNA needle
  • Device: 20G FNB needle
N/A

Detailed Description

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has emerged as a valuable method to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and exclude malignancy. During Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), tissue samples can be obtained for pathological evaluation with different devices. Previous studies suggest 19-gauge fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle provides a reliable specimen for diagnosis of AIP. However tissue architecture and cell morphology are essential for accurate pathological assessment. Therefore, pathologists generally prefer a histological specimen. Fine needle biopsy (FNB) has the advantage of obtaining a histological specimen, which may lead to better diagnostic performance. However, the superiority of histology over cytology in EUS-guided tissue sampling for diagnosis of AIP has not been proven yet. In this study, we aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 19G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
46 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial Comparing a 19-gauge EUS Fine-needle Aspiration Device With a 20-gauge Fine-needle Biopsy Device for the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 22, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 19G FNA needle

Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of AIP

Device: 19G FNA needle
Puncture of AIP under Endoscopic Ultrasonography, with a 19-gauge FNA needle
Other Names:
  • 19G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device
  • Active Comparator: 20G FNB needle

    Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of AIP

    Device: 20G FNB needle
    Puncture of AIP under Endoscopic Ultrasonography, with a 20-gauge FNB needle
    Other Names:
  • 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Diagnostic accuracy (compared to the gold standard diagnosis) [24 months]

      Gold standard diagnosis is defined as: based on the conclusions of the diagnostic work-up (combined outcomes of tissue sampling and imaging studies), and confirmed by a compatible clinical disease course of at least 12 months

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Technical success [24 months]

      tissue acquisition

    2. Quality of the tissue sample [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]

      Quality, defined as; presence of core tissue

    3. Quantity of the tissue sample [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]

      Quantity, defined as; presence of remnant material after diagnosis was obtained and sufficiency for advanced diagnostic processing

    4. Diagnostic yield of the first needle pass [within 2 weeks after the EUS procedure and after 24 months]

    5. Adverse events [first 24 hours until - 24 months after procedure]

      Safety

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 100 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition because of clinical suspicion of AIP

    • Age > 18 years

    • Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with co-fact or fresh frozen plasma (FFP)

    • Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued in order to guarantee an INR below 1.5

    • Previous inclusion in the current study

    • Pregnancy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing Beijing China 100730

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Aiming Yang, M.D., Peking Union Medical College Hospitalollege Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03753815
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ZS-1767
    First Posted:
    Nov 27, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 30, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 30, 2021