Burst Crossover Trial

Sponsor
St. Olavs Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05372822
Collaborator
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Other)
50
1
2
51.5
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely applied therapy to treat chronic neuropathic pain, and one of the most common indications is persisting radicular neuropathic pain following lumbar spine surgery. In traditional SCS therapies, the objective has been to replace the pain sensation with paresthesia. The anticipation is that the electrical current alters pain processing by masking the sensation of pain with a comfortable tingling or paresthesia. Although patients mostly cope with paresthesia, a significant proportion reports that the sensation is unpleasant.

'Burst' SCS utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli. This SCS technique seems to provide paresthesia-free stimulation, resulting in better pain relief of low back and leg pain then traditional tonic stimulation.

The widespread use of SCS has not been backed by solid evidence. The absence of placebo-controlled trials has long been an important point of criticism, but due to the nature of the intervention with sensation of paresthesia, studies with placebo control have so far not been considered possible. When 'burst' SCS is used the stimulation is often unnoticed by the patient, allowing comparison with placebo stimulation.

The aim of this randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 'burst' spinal cord stimulation for chronic radicular pain following spine surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Procedure: Sham spinal cord stimulation
  • Device: SCS implant
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
During the 12 months following implantation of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system, the patients will undergo four three-month long periods with either burst SCS or no stimulation (sham) in a randomized order. All patients will undergo two periods of SCS and sham stimulation.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Crossover Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 15, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 15, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Burst SCS

Burst Spinal cord stimulation. SCS system implanted and burst stimulation given

Procedure: Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation
Burst stimulation utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli of a 40 Hz burst mode with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per spike delivered in a constant current mode

Procedure: Sham spinal cord stimulation
No spinal cord stimulation is provided

Device: SCS implant
a subcutaneously implantable pulse generator ("pacemaker") for long-term therapy. The following system from Abbott will be implanted: ProclaimTM XR implantable pulse generator and Octrode® 8-contact lead

Sham Comparator: Sham SCS

Sham spinal cord stimulation. SCS system implanted but no stimulation given.

Procedure: Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation
Burst stimulation utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli of a 40 Hz burst mode with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per spike delivered in a constant current mode

Procedure: Sham spinal cord stimulation
No spinal cord stimulation is provided

Device: SCS implant
a subcutaneously implantable pulse generator ("pacemaker") for long-term therapy. The following system from Abbott will be implanted: ProclaimTM XR implantable pulse generator and Octrode® 8-contact lead

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. change in disease-specific functional outcome from baseline [12 months]

    measured with version 2.0 of the Oswestry disability index (ODI) that has been translated into Norwegian and tested for psychometric properties. The ODI questionnaire quantifies disability for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine and covers intensity of pain, ability to lift, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. The index is scored from 0 to 100. Zero means no disability and 100 reflects maximum disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in generic health-related quality of life measured with the Euro-Qol-5D (5L) [12 months]

  2. Change in back pain [12 months]

    measured using numerical rating scales (NRS)

  3. change in leg pain [12 months]

    measured using numerical rating scales (NRS)

  4. Daily physical activity [12 months]

    measured by use of a body-worn accelerometer (activPALs from PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, United Kingdom) attached by a waterproof tape to the midpoint of the patients' anterior right thigh

  5. Health Care Provider's Costs [12 months]

    Cost-effectiveness (cost per gained quality-adjusted life year)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Have undergone ≥1 back surgeries and developed chronic radicular pain that has remained refractory to non-surgical treatment for ≥6 months

  • Minimum pain intensity of 5/10 on the leg pain NRS at baseline

  • Successful two-week SCS testing period with tonic stimulation (≥2 points reduction in leg pain NRS from baseline). This means patients will experience paresthesia during the SCS trial period

  • Mandatory assessment at the Multidisciplinary outpatient clinic for back-, neck- and shoulder rehabilitation, St. Olavs University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Coexisting conditions that would increase procedural risk (e.g., sepsis, coagulopathy)

  • History of laminectomy or posterior fusion at the thoracolumbar junction, where percutaneous electrode end tips are routinely placed.

  • Abnormal pain behavior and/or unresolved psychiatric illness.

  • Unresolved issues of secondary gain or inappropriate medication use.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 St Olavs Hospital Trondheim Norway

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • St. Olavs Hospital
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sasha Gulati, md prof, St. Olavs Hospital
  • Study Director: Geir Bråthen, md prof, St. Olavs Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
St. Olavs Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05372822
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2018/475-b
First Posted:
May 13, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 26, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by St. Olavs Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 26, 2022