Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Opioid Based General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Sponsor
Cairo University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03798522
Collaborator
(none)
28
1
2
7.9
3.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blockade may represent a valuable alternatives to thoracіc epidurals analgaesіa in treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain.

There were 3 cases reported in 2017 suggested that the erector spinae plane block provides visceral abdominal analgesia in bariatric surgery and at end of the report they recommended further clinical investigation. The investigators hypothesіzed that performing the erector spinae plane (ESP) block at T7 would provide effective abdominal analgaesіa іn patients undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The investigators aimed to compare the analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block and opioid based general anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
  • Drug: Nalbuphine
N/A

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesized that, erector spinae plane block will provide good analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with less complication compared to opioid based general anesthesia. The visual analogue scale (VAS) will be explained clearly to all participants before conduction of anesthesia. All the drugs will be calculated according to the ideal body weight (IBW).A low-frequency (2-5 MHz) curved array ultrasound probe (Mindray®, China) will be used. In the 1st group: bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block will be performed under complete aseptic conditions in the lateral position at T7 vertebrae and before induction of general anesthesia. An 8-cm echogenic 22-G block needle will be inserted in-plane. A total of 20 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml bupivacaine (Sunnypivacaine, Sunny pharmaceutical, Egypt) 0.25%) will then be injected into the erector spinae plane. This procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended doses (2 mg/kg of IBW for bupivacaine). In the 2nd group: the investigator will give intravenous nalbuphine in a dose of 2mg /kg according to ideal body weight after induction of general anesthesia. All participants will be given 1 gram of intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/Kg), together with 4 mg ondansetron 10 min prior to the end of surgery for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

Intraoperatively, any increase in heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure 10 min after intubation by more than 20% of baseline values in response to surgical stimulus or thereafter throughout the whole operation will be managed by intravenous administration of fentanyl 0.5 µg/Kg. VAS score will be assessed 30 min after extubation and when the VAS score exceeded 4/10, rescue analgesia in the form of IV nalbuphine 5 mg will be administered. Another dose of rescue analgesia can be given in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) if the VAS still more than 4 after 60 min of extubation. If still high, Ketorolac 60 mg will be given by intravenous infusion.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
28 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
erector spinae plane block group (ESPB) general anesthesia group (GA)erector spinae plane block group (ESPB) general anesthesia group (GA)
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Opioid Based General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery; a Randomized Controlled Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: erector spinae plane block group (ESPB) n=14

Bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block will be performed in the lateral position at T7 vertebrae and before induction of GA. 20 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml bupivacaine (Sunnypivacaine, Sunny pharmaceutical, Egypt) 0.25%) will be injected in-plane into the ESP. This procedure will be repeated on the other side taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended doses (2 mg/kg of IBW for bupivacaine) and then GA will be conducted .

Procedure: bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
ESPB on both sides at T7 before GA
Other Names:
  • ESPB
  • Active Comparator: general anesthesia group (GA) n= 14

    these patients will receive iv nalbuphine in dose of 2mg /kg according to ideal body weight after induction of GA

    Drug: Nalbuphine
    in nalbuphine for analgesia after GA
    Other Names:
  • GA
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The duration of analgesic effect in minutes [defined as the time n minutes between finishing the block technique in ESPB group or after administration of nalbuphine in GA-group, and the request of first dose of postoperative analgesics) when VAS is more than 4 during the 1st 8 hours postoperatively]

      The duration of analgesic effect is indicated by the 1st analgesic requisite after measurement of VAS

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. mean arterial blood pressure changes [intraoperative and post extubation in the 1st hour]

      mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed and measured in mmHg non invasively

    2. Nalbuphine consumption [total dose given post operatively up to 1 hour postoperatively]

      in mg

    3. visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessment of postoperative pain [at 30 minutes, 45 minutes and 60 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours after surgery]

      in numbers, normal scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. if VAS score exceeded 4/10; this will be considered insufficient analgesia and participant will be given rescue analgesia

    4. Block failure rate [in the first hour postoperatively]

      patient required more than two 5mg doses of nalbuphine

    5. Resumption of peristalsis [postoperatively up to 48 hours postoperatively]

      in hours

    6. incidence of adverse effects [postoperative up to 48 hours]

      postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, hematoma formation, local anesthetic toxicity and need of postoperative ICU or mechanical ventilation

    7. Incidence of shoulder pain [postoperativey up to 24 hours]

      percent

    8. length of hospital stay [postoperative up to 28 days postoperatively]

      in days

    9. heart rate [intraoperatively and throughout one hour postextubation]

      heart rate in beat per minute will be measured

    10. Failure rate of the ESP block [in the first hour postoperatively]

      the block will be considered a failed block if the patient required more than two 5mg doses of nalbuphine

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. demographic data [during 30 minutes preoperatively]

      age, sex, ASA class, co-morbidities

    2. duration of surgery [from skin incision up to skin closure]

      in minutes

    3. weight [during 30 minutes preoperatively]

      kilograms

    4. height [during 30 minutes preoperatively]

      meter

    5. body mass index (BMI) [uring 30 minutes preoperatively]

      weight in kilograms divided by square height in meter

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 60 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patient age >18 <60

    • Obese patients 40˂ Body mass index(BMI) ˂50

    • Both sexes

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classes II and III

    • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery i.e. sleeve gastrectomy and/or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)surgeries

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Refusal of regional block

    • Patients with neurological, psychological disorders or those lacking cooperation

    • Patients scheduled for concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy or paraumbilical hernia repair or those with history of previous bariatric surgery or obstructive sleep apnea

    • Patients with anatomic abnormalities at site of injection, skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.

    • Patients with bleeding disorders defined as (INR >2) and/ or (platelet count <100,000/µL)

    • Patients with hepatic disease e.g. liver cell failure or hepatic malignancy or hepatic enlargement.

    • Patients who are allergic to amide local anesthetics.

    • Cases converted to open surgery will also be excluded from the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed Giza Egypt 12211

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Cairo University

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed, lecturer of anesthesia, pain management and surgical ICU, Cairo University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03798522
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • N-42-2018
    First Posted:
    Jan 10, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 14, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed, lecturer of anesthesia, pain management and surgical ICU, Cairo University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 14, 2020