CONVERSE: High Resolution Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Seattle Protocol for the Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus

Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05229783
Collaborator
(none)
100
15
2
28.7
6.7
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that careful examination of Barrett's esophagus by high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendoscopy could replace the Seattle protocol for Barrett's esophagus monitoring and detection of dysplasic lesions, and thus modify existing recommendations.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Electronic chromoendoscopy
  • Procedure: White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol
N/A

Detailed Description

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a pre-neoplastic condition that predisposes to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, a cancer with an increasing incidence and poor prognosis. However, when detected at an early stage, superficial lesions can be effectively treated by endoscopic resection. Although BE degeneration remains a rare event, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends that BE be followed according to its size. Follow-up consists of a digestive endoscopy with white light examination of the esophagus, targeted biopsies of any visible lesions and quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the BE, at a frequency that depends on the presence of dysplasia and the size of the BE. However, physician adherence to this procedure, known as the Seattle Protocol, is low because : 1) it increases the time required for the endoscopist to examine the patient and therefore the duration of sedation, as well as the time needed to interpret the pathology, 2) the risk of sampling error is high because only a small portion of the esophageal mucosa can be biopsied and 3) this approach is costly because of the time spent on the Seattle protocol in the operating room and in the pathology department.

New optical tools such as high-resolution endoscopy combined with magnification and electronic chromoendoscopy can reveal subtle mucosal and microvascular changes in the BE, which could improve the detection of early neoplastic lesions. However, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend its use in routine BE surveillance.

The investigators hypothesize that careful examination of Barrett's Esophagus by high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendoscopy could replace the Seattle protocol for BE monitoring and detection of dysplasic lesions, and thus modify existing recommendations.

In this study, each patient will be his(her) own control and have the two procedures :
  • Firstly, an endoscopist called A will perform high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy and note on a scheme the biopsies/resection he would have done with this procedure.

  • Secondly, another endoscopist called B will do the examination using white light modality of the endoscope and process as follows :

  1. He/she will describe all visible lesions with precise indications of their location on a virgin scheme;

  2. Then, he/she will be unblinded to endoscopist A findings, see the scheme of endoscopist A and perform biopsies/resection according to instructions of this scheme;

  3. He/she will perform the biopsies/resection he/she would have added (if any);

  4. Finally, he/she will perform the quadrantic biopsies according to Seattle Protocol.

Final histology results will serve as gold standard for the diagnosis of early esophageal adenocarcnoma or high grade displasia.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Each patient will be his (her) own control and have the two procedures : Firsty : high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy (performed by endoscopist A) Secondly: white light endoscopy with Seattle protocol (performed by endoscopist B)Each patient will be his (her) own control and have the two procedures :Firsty : high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy (performed by endoscopist A) Secondly: white light endoscopy with Seattle protocol (performed by endoscopist B)
Masking:
Single (Care Provider)
Masking Description:
The two endoscopists will be blinded to each other's findings when searching the lesions.
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
High Resolution Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Seattle Protocol for the Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus: Impact on the Detection of High-grade Dysplasia and Adenocarcinoma Lesions
Actual Study Start Date :
May 11, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Electronic chromoendoscopy

High-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions

Procedure: Electronic chromoendoscopy
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the electronic chromoendoscopy modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions.

Active Comparator: White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol

White light endoscopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)

Procedure: White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the white light modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of both high grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma lesions detected by electronic chromoendoscopy versus rate of such lesions detected by white light endoscopy plus systemic biopsies according to Seattle protocol. [Day 1]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of both high grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma lesions detected by electronic chromoendoscopy versus rate of such lesions detected by white light endoscopy. [Day 1]

  2. Rate of low grade displasia lesions detected by electronic chromoendoscopy versus rate of such lesions detected by white light endoscopy plus systemic biopsies according to Seattle protocol. [Day 1]

  3. Duration (in minutes) of each procedure: white light endoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy, Seattle protocol. [Day 1]

  4. Rate of missed lesions (both high grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma) diagnosed by an adjudication committee reviewing videos from the procedure. [Day 1]

  5. Rate of resected lesions (both high grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma) that were detected by endoscopist performing electronic chromoendoscopy, but missed by endoscopist performing white light endoscopy and Seattle protocol. [Day 1]

  6. Number of adverse events [Day 30]

  7. Cost effectiveness of the detection of both early esophageal adenocarcinoma and high grade dysplasia with electronic chromoendoscopy versus cost effectiveness of Seattle protocol. [Day 30]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or Female with Age above ≥ years old;

  • Female of childbearing potential must use appropriate method(s) of contraception during the clinical trial(i.e.: Intrauterine Device, pill, implant);

  • Non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus of more than 3cm or dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus whatever the size;

  • Patient requiring esophageal endoscopy as part of their regular monitoring;

  • Affiliated to social security;

  • Patient received Patient Information Form and accepted to participate to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previously treated Barrett's Esophagus;

  • Known invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma;

  • Contraindication to general anesthesia;

  • Ongoing clopidogrel or anticoagulant therapy or coagulation disorder (platelet count < 50 000/mm3, Prothrombin time ratio <50%);

  • Poor general health status precluding subsequent follow up of Barrett's Esophagus ;

  • For female: pregnancy or breastfeeding;

  • Adults under a legal protection regime (guardianship, trusteeship, "under judicial protection").

  • Ongoing participation in another study requiring an intervention on Barrett's Esophagus during patient's participation in Converse study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Amiens University Hospital Amiens France 80054
2 Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France 33604
3 Brest University Hospital Brest France 26609
4 Private Bercy clinic Charenton France 94220
5 Limoges University Hospital Limoges France 87000
6 Lyon University Hospital Lyon France 69003
7 Private Jean Mermoz Hospital Lyon France 69008
8 Nantes University Hospital Nantes France 44093
9 Nice University Hospital Nice France 06202
10 Saint-Antoine Hospital Paris France 75012
11 Public Assistance - Paris hospitals - Cochin hospital Paris France 75014
12 Public Assistance- Paris Hospitals - Georges Pompidou European Hospital Paris France 75015
13 Poitiers University Hospital Poitiers France 86021
14 Rennes University Hospital Rennes France 35033
15 Sainte Barbe Clinic Strasbourg France 67000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nantes University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucille QUENEHERVE, Doctor, CHU de Brest

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nantes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05229783
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RC21_0411
First Posted:
Feb 8, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 17, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 17, 2022